Properly Made submission (object) - Daryyl Fry · MCU12/0023

Daryyl Fry
36 Pelican St.

Peregian Beach. Qld 4573\                     SCRC CORRESPONDENCE

0754482467
15 May 20012
                                             1111111111111111111111111 ~
                                                   80486089


The Chief Executive Officer
Sunshine Coast regional Council
Locked bag 72, Sunshine Coast mail centre Qld. 4560


Dear Sir,
                                              Notice of Objection


RE: Proposed Development Peregian Beach        -
                                                 material change of use. Application no. MCU12/0023


I understand that Scanlon Property Group (SPG)have lodged an application in the Planning and
Environment Court in December 2011. This application seeks to vary the terms of agreement as set
this court in 2009.
                                                                                Box::..q~ .",IR:    "..   .,
                                                                                                               ,,!:’...

                                                                                                                      ~
SPG have already been through a court process to achieve a mutually acceptable agreement between the

company and the Sunshine Coast Regional Council. This agreement specifically prohibited outdoor dining
on the grounds of noise to local residents and antisocial behaviour due to its proximity to the Peregian Beach
Hotel and the installation of a backpacker’s hostel. Backpackers are usually travellers who keep late hours
and (understandably)have an active social life. This contrasts with the quiet village life-style and

expectations ofthe maj rity of local residents. The proposal falls outside the Noosa Plan and represents a
material change of use as dictated by the plan. In essence each change of use or rezoning changes the plan
and encourages exponential changes by other developers.


SPG have also applied to add balconies to the motel-style units. Again this is outside the agreement and a
new addition to the   development. It should therefore be regarded as a new development application. Given
that there are three liquor outlets in the immediate vicinity, this is likely to add to the noise and disturbance

throughout the village.

Residents here and throughout the Sunshine Coast need to have faith that, after spending ratepayer’s money
on   defending the region’s town plan in the courts, their local government will uphold the court decisions and
agreements. This provides certainty to residents and businesses alike. To do otherwise is to encourage
incremental overdevelopment, eventually changing the character of the districts that residents seek to

preserve.


Consequently I ask that your assessment division reject the variations sought by SPG and hold them to the
existing agreement, so that we can preserve the intent ofthe Noosa Plan that designated Peregian as low
profile village pr!!cinct.

Yours sincerely,


                 1[;
Darryl Fry
                 J