09/0879 - MCU - Detached House Peter Francis Amour [As Published] · 132009.879

 

018 Buildings and other structures
including swimming pools and retaining
walls do not extend seaward of the
coastal building line except—

a) uncovered and unenciosed
cantilevered baiconies that do not
extend greater than 3m seaward of the
coastal building line; and

b) are setback a minimum of 6m from
the seaward boundary AND

019 Where a coastal building line does
not exist on properties fronting the
beachfront or a reserve adjoining the
beachfront- buildings, other structures
and retaining walls are setback a
minimum of 6m from the seaward
boundary of the site

AND

020 Rear fences adjacent to the
beachfront within the Coastal
Protection Area are designed and sited
to be sympathetic with the visual
amenity of the beachfront and do not
degrade the natural beachfront
character.

$18.1 No solution provided.

§19.1 No solution provided.

$20.1 Rear fences adjacent to the
beachfront within the Coastal
Protection Area incorporate the
following—

a) no more than 1.2m in height; and
b) open construction (ie at least 50%

Complies - The building includes an
unenclosed and uncovered balcony on the
first floor that cantilevers 3 metres into
coastal building fine. A small wall extends
along the southem portion of the balcony
providing privacy screening to the poo! on
the adjoining property as weil as protection
from prevailing winds.

Two smaller balconies are proposed on
the upper level which partially cover the
lower decks. These balconies are well
setback from the seaward boundary and
are similar to balconies approved under
23039 DA

Not applicable

The proposal is able to comply with
Council requirements.

 

transparent);

c) lightweight materials (ie timber); and
d) dark colours to blend with the natural
landscape.

AND

$20.2 Gates ere not installed in fences
to gain direct access to the beachfront.

 

 

 

 

The detached house has been located to minimise the impact on the natural dune system and
surrounding area. The building steps down the site maintaining a low profile to surrounding areas and
is located well back from the beach front. The building is of a similar form to that previously approved
by Council under 23039 DA.

3.2 Siting Variation

The detached house has been reviewed against the provisions of the Detached House Code of the 2008
Noosa Plan and is considered to comply with the provisions of the Code. The dwelling includes a pitched roof
form, eaves and is consistent with site cover requirements.

As previously indicated the applicant also seeks a siting variation for the location of the garage within
the front 6.0.metre setback. The proposed garage is to be located abutting the front property boundary.
The garage is to be a single storied structure containing parking for two vehicles and is to be of
tendered masonry construction.

The garage is located in a similar location to that approved under 23039 DA and is consistent with other
garages in the street.

In accordance with the Building Works Code of the Noosa Plan, a 6.0 metre setback is required to be
provided for structure to the street frontage. The proposal is considered to comply with the Specific
Outcomes as demonstrated below:

Setbacks

01 Buildings and other structures are appropriately designed and sited to—

a) provide amenity for users of the premises as well as preserve the visual and acoustic privacy of
adjoining and nearby land uses;

The location of the carport at the front of the site will be consistent with other approvals in the area.
The garage will be located away from noise sensitive areas on adjoining lots.

Page 4