Original source · versioned page text
2017-09-12 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (25.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Since that time there has been:
1. A further judgement by the Planning & Environment Court, which is subject to a current
appeal to the Queensland Court of Appeal. This judgement provided significant further
context to the issue, in particular the arrangements that apply if building work is assessable
under a planning scheme. In this case the court found that 2 development approvals were
required (one from the Council and one from the private building certifier).
2. Legislative amendments to both the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and the Planning Act
2016 to address the issues raised in the Gerhardt judgements and clearly identify the
relative responsibilities of certifiers and Councils in assessing building work in way that
allows each to effectively address their respective interests.
The legislative amendments have addressed the issues raised by the Gerhardt judgements
satisfactorily restoring Council’s ability to effectively regulate building works. Therefore the
amenity and aesthetic resolution is no longer necessary for Council to have in place. On this
basis and given the consequences of not deciding these type of applications within the required
time frame (private building certifiers may decide the application as if Council had no response),
it is recommended that Council no longer continue with this resolution.
Previous Council Consideration
Ordinary Meeting, 18 August 2016, Item 3, Page 5
That Council note the report by the Manager, Planning & Environment to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 9 August 2016 and resolve for the purpose of Schedule
7, Table 1 item 17 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009:
A. to be a concurrence agency for a building or structure which is a single detached class
1(a)(i) building, class 1(a)(ii) building comprising not more than 2 attached dwellings or a
class 10 building or structure in the circumstances outlined in Table 1 below; and
B. that the form of building works which do not comply with the Probable Solutions and/or
Specific Outcomes outlined in Column 3 of Table 1 of the relevant codes identified in
Column 1 of Table 1 may:
(a) have an extremely adverse effect on the amenity or likely amenity of the locality; or
(b) be in extreme conflict with the character of the locality
Table 1 – Declared building form for amenity and aesthetic referral agency assessment in
Noosa Shire
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
Code Concurrence Agency Assessment Probable Solutions/Specific
Required Outcomes
Building Works Where carrying out building work if Table 14-44 S1.1, S2.3, S10.1,
Code demolition, relocation or removal of a S11.1-S11.3 S12.1, S13.1, S14.1,
building and not associated with a S15.1, S16.1, S16.2, S17.1,
material change of use and not S18.1-S18.4, S20.1, S21,1,
complying with the Probable Solutions S21.2, S22.1,
identified in column 3 of this table. Table 14-45 S23.1-S23.3,
Applies to all localities if a locality or
Table 14-45 S24.1-S24.7, S25.1-
zone is not identified.
S25.6
Biodiversity Overlay Where involving interference with Table 13.2 S9.1, S10.1
Code vegetation on premises identified as
Environmental Protection Area,
Environmental Enhancement Area or
Riparian Buffer Area on Biodiversity
Overlay Maps OM1.1 to OM9.1; or
Where on premises identified as
Page 129 of 168
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.