Original source · versioned page text
RESPONSE TO SARA IR - Attachment 1A - RFA24-059-SARA IR Response 310725
Rob Friend & Associates Pty Ltd
Environmental Land Management Consultants
RF&A
Office – Unit 4/3 Heaslop St
Woolloongabba
Postal - 28 Merton Road
Woolloongabba Qld. 4102
p - (07) 3891 9131
f - (07) 3393 0388
m - 0419-667346
Your reference: -- e - [email protected]
w – www.robfriend.com
Our reference: -- RFA24-059
ABN 83 097 068 114
Date: - 31st of July 2025 ACN 097 068 114
Sarah Lawley
Principal Planning Officer
State Assessment and Referral Agency
PO Box 1129
Maroochydore, Qld 4558
Dear Ms Lawley,
Re: - SARA Reference 2503-45382 SRA
Response to Information Request - 561 Eumundi Noosa Road, Doonan
Further to your Information Request for the proposed extension of the waste management area at
the Doonan Waste Management facility, dated 26 May 2025.
Item 1 of the Information Request states -
Issue:
The application material has not adequately demonstrated that the proposed development
complies with the performance outcomes (PO)1-PO3 and PO4-PO18 requirements of state code
16. In particular, insufficient details have been provided regarding the extent of vegetation that will
become exempt clearing work if the development application is approved.
It is unclear which plan provided with the application material most accurately reflects the new
proposed development, and no digital data (e.g. shapefile) has been provided to show all new and
relocated infrastructure. Additionally, it is unclear where the proposed new fence lines will be
located.
It is stated in ‘Attachment 4 - Environmental Offset and Reinforcement Planting Advice_6’ that
‘Noosa Council proposes to clear the Category X vegetation at Site A for a Resource Recovery
Centre Expansion. The clearing of Category X vegetation on Site A does not require assessment
under the Planning Regulation 2017 and the Vegetation Management Act 1999’. This statement is
incorrect, as a material change of use application includes assessment of clearing as a result of
the material change of use, as per the definition found in SDAP State Code 16: Native Vegetation.
Assessable clearing includes clearing of vegetation that will become exempt clearing work if the
development application is approved.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.
Full text of the other 16 pages
Page 2
2
The clearing as a result of the development will include essential management exemptions that will
become available once the development is approved, and this includes clearing for firebreaks and
safety buffers adjoining proposed infrastructure (other than fences, roads and underground
services) for a distance of 20m or 1.5 times the height of the tallest adjacent trees. This also
includes clearing to establish a necessary fence, if the maximum width of the clearing for the fence
is 10m.
Furthermore, the application material does not include any tree height data. If no tree height data is
provided, the assessable clearing for this development is calculated using the Technical
Description report for South-East Queensland for regional ecosystem 12.5.3 which states a
maximum tree canopy height of 30m, which when multiplied by 1.5, results in a firebreak width of
45m from the proposed building envelopes.
Action –
Provide digital data that shows all new and relocated infrastructure within 45m of the
category B vegetation, and all new fences located within 5m of the category B vegetation.
Digital data should include a projected spatial reference (e.g. GDA94 or GDA2020) and
preferably be in an ESRI compatible format (shapefile, geodatabase or KML).
Please note: DWG and CAD drawing files are not sufficient as they are incompatible with
ESRI spatial products.
Provide tree height measurements for the tallest trees in category B areas adjacent to
proposed infrastructure to identify the assessable clearing. Data to be provided to
determine accurate tree heights should include pictures of the trees adjacent to the
proposed infrastructure with an object of known height (survey staff) along with GPS
coordinates identifying the exact location of the measured tree.
If digital data confirms that vegetation clearing in category B is necessary for essential
management. Specifically, a response to PO1 - PO3 and PO4 - PO18 of state code 16 will
be required.
Response
Vegetation Mapping
1. The Noosa Shire Council has placed a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV)
over all of the land fill and management areas (PMAV 2017/000924). This map identifies
the extent of Category X Regulated Vegetation and the extent of Category B regulated
vegetation under the property to which the PMAV has been made. It is noted that with
respect to the areas of vegetation that may be required to be removed as a consequence
of the proposed development, if approved, that the vegetation to the immediate west of the
existing site is Category X Regulated vegetation.
2. Further, there are areas that have been cleared along the current site’s northern and
eastern boundaries and maintained as low grassy vegetation.
3. To the north is a large polygon of Category B regulated vegetation or the Regional
Ecosystem 12.5.3 - Eucalyptus racemosa subsp. racemosa woodland with Corymbia
intermedia, E. siderophloia +/- E. tindaliae, E. resinifera, E. pilularis, E. microcorys,
Angophora leiocarpa. Melaleuca quinquenervia is often a prominent feature of lower
slopes. Minor patches (<1ha) dominated by Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata
sometimes occur. Occurs on complex of remnant Tertiary surfaces +/- Cainozoic and
Mesozoic sediments. Not a Wetland. (BVG1M: 9g).
4. The Technical Descriptions for various Regional Ecosystems in South-east Queensland
Bioregion (2018 edition) describes the height the T1 stratum of RE12.5.3 has its tallest
Page 3
3
height of 30 metres with an average of 45 metres. This would permit under State Code 16
and for existing infrastructure a 1.5 x clearing exemption of 45 metres (see Figure 1).
5. The site was reinspected on the June 2025 and tallest tree observed within the 1.5 times
area was a Eucalyptus racemosa (Scribbly gum) was 16 metres.
6. If the tallest observed tree on the site was accepted as the basis for a 1.5 times setback,
then the firebreak in accordance with the State Code 16 would be 24 metres instead of the
tallest tree height for the Regional Ecosystem 12.5.3 as provided by the Regional
Ecosystem Technical Descriptions (see Figure 1).
Exemptions
1. We note that Category X regulated vegetation on freehold land is exempted from
regulation for any purposes. Therefore, we maintained our view that no additional
approvals by SARA / Department of Resources and as such no response to the State
Code 16 is required.
2. The Category x area is not mapped in the Noosa City Plan Biodiversity overlay and as
such no approvals are required from the Noosa Shire Council.
3. The definition of “Clearing as a result of a material change of use, 2 –
“clearing of vegetation that will become exempt clearing work if the development
application is approved. This includes any of the following examples:
a. clearing for routine management and essential management purposes associated
with the approved development including clearing to maintain proposed infrastructure,
facilities, roads, access routes, utilities, services and fences, and clearing to maintain
the safety of persons and property that will be associated with the development
b. clearing for necessary fire breaks, fire management lines and associated with the
development. This will be assessed as follows:
i. all built infrastructure other than underground services, roads and fences will
be assessed as requiring clearing for fire breaks and safety buffers with a
width of 20 metres or 1.5 times the height of the tallest adjacent tree to the
infrastructure, whichever is the greater. The extent of clearing assessed will
include any vegetation that may be required to be cleared for fire breaks
distances and safety buffers on adjoining land”.
4. This definition provides for one of two options depending on the height of the adjacent
vegetation, 1.5 times the height of the tallest vegetation or if that figure is less than 20
metres then the clearing width is 20 metres.
5. The site inspection determined that the maximum height of the tallest tree adjacent to the
infrastructure was 16 metres, therefore the necessary clearing that could become exempt
clearing work would be 24 metres.
6. With regard to the Category B Regulated Vegetation of the Regional Ecosystem 12.5.3
and with respect to what is existing “exempted clearing” under State Code 16, that up to 24
metres from the current development is considered to be exempt clearing. This extent is
shown on Figure 1 (the yellow line).
7. With respect to the additional clearing which may be classed as exempted clearing as a
consequence of the approved development, this will extend 24 metres into the Category B
regulated vegetation 24 metres from the extent of that infrastructure. (see dark blue line in
Figure 1).
Page 4
4
8. This will result in the loss of 166.03 sq.m. of Category B regulated vegetation (green
polygon). This additional clearing may be included within what is defined as a firebreak as
part of the MCU under the State Code 16.
9. However, we further note that the fact sheet provides with the following clarification with
respect to a necessary firebreak or necessary fire management line. The fact sheet states
in reference to what is necessary clearing “Landholders intending to operate under this
exemption may only clear firebreaks and fire management lines where they are necessary
to protect lives and property”.
10. Therefore, the necessary clearing is only that which is required to provide an acceptable
level of bushfire risk for the proposed development.
11. The State Planning Policy, Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience Technical Guideline
indicates that an acceptable risk as achieve a Radiant Heat Flux of no greater than
29kW/m2.
12. The minimal separation distance that achieves a Radiant Heat Flux of 29kW/m2 is
calculated using the Flamesol Method 2 minimal distance calculator with the local input
values for the FFDI and attributed fuel load values for the mapped Vegetation Hazard
Class. Table 1 below provides the minimal distance calculation that achieves the Radiant
heat flux value of 29kW/m2.
Table 1 – Minimal distance Calculation
Doonan Waste Management Facility - Minimum Distance Calculator - AS3959-2018 (Method 2)
(Calculated July 25, 2025, 4:39 pm (MDc v.4.9))
Inputs Outputs
Fire Danger Index 48 Rate of spread 1.25 km/h
Vegetation Forest Flame length 11.04 m
Classification
Understorey fuel load 21 t/ha Flame angle 53.5 °, 63.5 °, 72.5 °, 77.5 °, 78.5 ° &
84.5 °
Total fuel load 24.2 t/ha Elevation of receiver 4.35 m, 4.83 m, 5.1 m, 5.16 m, 5.13 m
& 4.79 m
Vegetation height n/a Fire intensity 15,654 kW/m
Effective slope .5 ° Transmissivity 0.879, 0.863, 0.841, 0.816, 0.803 &
0.736
Site slope .5 ° Viewfactor 0.5971, 0.4385, 0.2966, 0.2007,
0.1633 & 0.0445
Flame width 100 m Minimum distance to < 40 9.1 m
kW/m²
Windspeed n/a Minimum distance to < 29 12.4 m
kW/m²
Heat of combustion 18,600 Minimum distance to < 19 18.2 m
kJ/kg kW/m²
Flame temperature 1,090 K Minimum distance to < 12.5 26.3 m
kW/m²
Minimum distance to < 10 31.5 m
kW/m²
Rate of Spread - Mcarthur, 1973 & Noble et al., 1980
Flame length - NSW Rural Fire Service, 2001 & Noble et al., 1980
Page 5
5
Elevation of receiver - Douglas & Tan, 2005
Flame angle - Douglas & Tan, 2005
Radiant heat flux - Drysdale, 1999, Sullivan et al., 2003, Douglas & Tan, 2005
13. Therefore, the minimal distance that achieves a Radiant heat flux of 29kW/m2 is 12.4
metres and this spatially located on Figure 1 and the light blue line.
Conclusion
Based on the above analysis we can conclude that;
1. The exempted clearing distance for the existing development and the proposed
development is a clearing with of 24.0 metres.
2. However, the only clearing that is necessary is that which achieves a radiant heat flux of
29kW/m2 is 12.4 metres, the only clearing that is required of any area of category is that
which is within 12.4 metres of the closest edge of the existing and proposed infrastructure.
3. As the 12.4 metres necessary clearing distance for a necessary firebreak is less than the
1.5 time the height of the tallest adjacent trees, this clearing is considered to be exempted
clearing.
Page 6
Response to State Code 16
The information Request requires a response to a number of Performance Outcomes in Stage Code 16. The are provided in Table 2 below.
Table 2 – Stage Code 16
Table 16.2: General
Performance outcomes Acceptable Response
outcomes
PO1 Clearing of vegetation is consistent with any notice No acceptable No notice of compliance has been issued by the State
requiring compliance on the land subject to the development outcome is
application, unless a better environmental outcome can be prescribed.
achieved.
PO2 Clearing of vegetation is consistent with vegetation No acceptable The proposed and necessary clearing is consistent and less than that
management requirements for particular regulated areas outcome is which is exempted clearing.
unless a better environmental outcome can be achieved. prescribed.
The clearing is to comply with the State Planning Policy to achieve an
acceptable level of bushfire risk for infrastructure and the clearing
necessary to achieve that is 12.4 metres from the closest edge of the
existing and proposed infrastructure.
PO3 Clearing of vegetation in a legally secured offset area: No acceptable The proposed clearing area is not in a legally secured offset area.
outcome is
1. is consistent with the offset delivery plan; or
prescribed.
2. is consistent with an agreement for the offset area on
the land subject to the development application; or
3. only occurs if an additional offset is provided.
Page 7
7
Table 16.3: Public safety, relevant infrastructure activities and / or consequential development of IPA approval
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Clearing avoids and minimises impacts
PO4 Clearing of vegetation and adverse impacts of clearing No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The proposed clearing is within the exempted
vegetation do not occur unless the application has demonstrated that clearing area and as such no additi0onal or
the clearing and the adverse impacts of clearing have been: adverse impacts would occur around the
proposed development.
1. reasonably avoided; or
The clearing of the exempted clearing area
2. reasonably minimised where it cannot be reasonably
has been avoided as the necessary clearing
avoided.
for a necessary firebreak is such that it
provides a maximum radiant heat flux
exposure of 29kW/m2 for all infrastructure
within the existing and proposed
development.
The proposed necessary clearing to achieve
an acceptable level of bushfire has been
reduced from 2,116.84 sq.m. to 801.81 sq.m.
This clearing cannot be reasonably avoided
in this location
Clearing associated with wetlands
PO5 Clearing of vegetation within a natural wetland and/or within AO5.1 Clearing does not occur in a natural The proposed necessary clearing is within
100 metres of the defining bank of a natural wetland maintains the wetland or within 100 metres of the the mapped Regional Ecosystem 12.5.3
composition, structure and function of any regional ecosystem defining bank of any natural wetland. which is not mapped as a wetland regional
associated with any natural wetland to protect all of the following: ecosystem.
OR
1. bank stability by protecting against bank erosion; A natural wetland is mapped approximately
AO5.2 Clearing within 100 metres of the
60 metres from the proposed clearing and as
2. water quality by filtering sediments, nutrients and other defining bank of any natural wetland:
such no clearing will occur within 10 metres
Page 8
8
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
pollutants; 1. does not occur within 10 metres of of the defining bank of any natural wetland.
the defining bank of any natural
3. aquatic habitat; The proposed necessary clearing will
wetland; and
comnply with AO5.2 2 and table 1 of the
4. terrestrial habitat.
2. does not exceed widths in State Code 16 in that the necessary clearing
reference table 1 in this code. is less than 20 metres in width.
PO6 Where clearing of vegetation in a regional ecosystem No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The clearing will not occur within a regional
associated with a natural wetland does not maintain the composition, ecosystem associated with a wetland
structure and function of the regional ecosystem, and cannot be
avoided and has been mitigated, an offset is provided for any
acceptable significant residual impact.
Clearing associated with watercourses and drainage features
PO7 Clearing of vegetation within a watercourse and/or drainage AO7.1 Clearing does not occur in any of No clearing will occur within or around the
feature and/or within the relevant distance (listed in reference table 2) the following areas: defined bank of a watercourse or drainage
of a watercourse and/or drainage feature, maintains the 1. inside the defining bank of a feature.
composition, structure and function of the regional ecosystem
watercourse or drainage feature; The proposed necessary clearing complies
associated with the watercourse and/or drainage feature to protect
and with the requirements of Table 2 of the State
all of the following:
2. within the relevant distance of the Code 16.
1. bank stability by protecting against bank erosion;
defining bank of any watercourse or
2. water quality by filtering sediments, nutrients and other pollutants; drainage feature in reference table 2
of this code.
3. aquatic habitat;
4. terrestrial habitat. OR
AO7.2 Clearing within any watercourse
or drainage feature, or within the relevant
distance of the defining bank of any
watercourse or drainage feature in
reference table 2 of this code:
1. does not exceed the widths in
Page 9
9
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
reference table 1 of this code; and
2. does not occur within 10 metres of
the defining bank, unless
clearing is required into or across
the watercourse or drainage
feature.
PO8 Where clearing of vegetation in a regional ecosystem No acceptable outcome is prescribed. No clearing will occur in a Regional
associated with a watercourse and/or drainage feature does not Ecosystem associated with a watercourse or
maintain the composition, structure and function of the regional a drainage feature
ecosystem, and cannot be avoided and has been mitigated, an
offset is provided for any acceptable significant residual impact.
Connectivity
PO9 Regional ecosystems on the subject land and any adjacent AO9.1 Clearing occurs in accordance with All necessary clearing will not occur or result
land retain sufficient vegetation to: reference table 3 in this code. in impacts to the coastal regional ecosystem
1. maintain ecological processes; and as specified in Table 3 of State Code 16.
2. ensure the regional ecosystem remains in the landscape
despite threatening processes.
Soil erosion if the local government is not the assessment manager for the development application
PO10 Clearing of vegetation does not result in accelerated soil AO10.1 Clearing only occurs if an erosion The proposed necessary clearing will not
erosion within or outside the land the subject of the development and sediment control plan is developed result in Accelerated spoil erosion as the
application.\ and implemented to prevent increased soil cleared area will be grassed and maintained
erosion and instability resulting from the by Noosa Shire Council
clearing.
Salinity
PO11 Clearing of vegetation within 100 metres of a salinity AO11.1 Clearing does not occur within no clearing will occur within 100- metres of a
expression area does not contribute to or accelerate land 100 metres of a salinity expression area. salinity expression area.
Page 10
10
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
degradation through either of the following: the necessary clearing will not result in
waterlogging and/or salinity of groundwater or
1. waterlogging;
surface water or the soil under which the
2. the salinisation of groundwater, surface water or soil. necessary clearing will be undertaken.
Conserving least concern regional ecosystems - Minimising clearing of areas temporarily required to enable construction of the infrastructure
PO12 Clearing of vegetation for temporary use areas to construct AO12.1 Clearing for temporary use areas The proposed necessary clearing is not
necessary infrastructure, such as temporary use roads or access to construct necessary infrastructure does within a least concern regional ecosystem.
tracks, maintains the composition, structure and function of least not occur in a least concern regional
concern regional ecosystems. ecosystem.
OR
AO12.2 Total clearing for temporary use
areas to construct necessary infrastructure
in any regional ecosystem combined
does not exceed the widths prescribed in
table reference table 1 of this code.
OR
AO12.3 Total clearing for temporary use
areas to construct necessary infrastructure
in any regional ecosystem combined
does not exceed areas prescribed in table
reference table 1 of this code.
PO13 Where clearing of vegetation in a regional ecosystem for No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The proposed necessary clearing is not for a
temporary use areas to construct necessary infrastructure does not temporary use or infrastructure but to ensure
maintain the composition, structure and function of the regional the existing and proposed development is at
ecosystem, and cannot be avoided and has been mitigated, the an acceptable level of bushfire risk as
cleared area is rehabilitated. required under the State Planning Policy,
Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience.
Page 11
11
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems
PO14 Clearing of vegetation maintains the composition, structure AO14.1 Clearing does not occur in an Necessary clearing for a necessary firebreak
and function of endangered regional ecosystems and/or of endangered regional ecosystem or an of will occur withi9n an area of Endangered
concern regional ecosystems. concern regional ecosystem. Regional Ecosystem, that being the
OR RE12.5.3.
AO14.2 Total clearing of endangered The proposed clearing is for approximately
801.81 sq. m. and as such the RE12.5.3, a
regional ecosystems and of concern
sparse structural as described in the
regional ecosystems combined does not
exceed the widths prescribed in table Regional Ecosystem Description Database
(REDD) and comply with the maximum
reference table 1 of this code.
clearing area specified in Table 1 of State
OR Code 16.
AO14.3 Total clearing of endangered
regional ecosystems and of concern
regional ecosystems combined does not
exceed areas prescribed in table reference
table 1 of this code.
PO15 Where clearing of vegetation in an endangered regional No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The necessary clearing within the
ecosystem or an of concern regional ecosystems does not endangered regional ecosystem 12.5.3 can
maintain the composition, structure and function of the regional not be mitigated as its necessary clearing for
ecosystem, and cannot be avoided and has been mitigated, the a necessary firebreak around infrastructure.
cleared area: The area, 801.81 sq.m. will be maintained as
1. is rehabilitated; or a native grassland to the extent that native
2. where the cleared area cannot reasonably be rehabilitated, an grasses will recolonise the area.
offset is provided for any acceptable significant residual No offsets are proposed as the clearing is
impact. considered to be exempted clearing.
Essential habitat excluding essential habitat for Phascolarctos cinereus (koalas) if development is assessable under Schedule 10, Part 10 of the Planning
Regulation 2017
Page 12
12
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO16 Clearing of vegetation in a regional ecosystem that is an AO16.1 Clearing does not occur in The proposed clearing is considered to be
area of essential habitat maintains the composition, structure and essential habitat. exempt development under Schedule 10,
function of the regional ecosystem for each protected wildlife Part 10, Division 2, s16A (2) and Division 3,
OR
species individually. subdivision 1 s16B (2)(a) of the Planning
AO16.2 Clearing in essential habitat Regulation 2017 for areas mapped as a
does not exceed the widths prescribed in Priority Koal Area (PKA).
reference table 1 of this code.
The necessary clearing for a necessary
OR firebreak is exempted development but
AO16.3 Clearing in essential habitat despite that, the necessary clearing will be
does not exceed the areas prescribed in less than that specified in Table 1 of State
table reference table 1 of this code. Code 16.
PO17 Where clearing of vegetation in a regional ecosystem that is No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The necessary clearing for a necessary
an area of essential habitat does not maintain the composition, firebreak is exempted clearing and as such
structure and function of the regional ecosystem, and cannot be no offsets are required.
avoided and has been mitigated, an offset is provided for any
acceptable significant residual impact for each protected wildlife
species individually.
Acid sulfate soils if the local government is not the assessment manager for the development application
PO18 Clearing of vegetation does not result in, or accelerate, AO18.1 Clearing does not occur in land The clearing proposed is in a land zone
disturbance of acid sulfate soils or changes to the hydrology of the zone 1, land zone 2 or land zone 3. identified as land zone 5.
location that will result in either of the following:
OR
1. aeration of horizons containing iron sulphides;
AO18.2 Clearing in land zone 1, land
2. mobilisation of acid or metals. zone 2 or land zone 3 in areas below the
five metre Australian Height Datum only
occurs where:
1. mechanical clearing does not disturb
the soil to a depth greater than 30
Page 13
13
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
centimetres; and
2. acid sulfate soils are managed
consistent with the soil management
guidelines in the Queensland Acid
Sulfate Soil Technical Manual.
Page 14
If you have any further questions, please contact me directly or via Council’s Town Planner, Mr Shane Adamson of Adamson Town Planning. Yours faithfully, Rob Friend Director Rob Friend & Associates Pty Ltd
Page 15
15 Figure 1 — exempted and necessary clearing line work.
Page 16
Doonana Waste Management Facility A product of
Existing exemped clearing (yellow) and additional exemption (white line) aqrea is 235.53 sq.m. which is exempted development
26°26'6"S 153°1'26"E 26°26'6"S 153°1'32"E
Legend located on next page
Setback lines
1.5 times Tree height (45m)
(existing development)
1.5 times tree height (45m)
proposed development
24.02 m
24.00 m
24.01 m
24.0 12.40 m
24.01 m
24.0
16
24.
6.0
24.0
m
02
3
0m
1m
23 sq
12.41 m
.02
12.41 m
State Code 16 additional
m
12.41 m
0m
.9 m
12.41 m
m
24
12.41 m
9
m
1
23.9 m clearing for a firebreak
.4
9m 41
12
12.
12
.40
m
Radiant heat flux 29kW/m2
Acceptable level of bushfire
risk (12.4m) = Necessary clearing
for a necessary firebreak
0 10 metres
Scale: 1:600
Printed at: A3
Print date: 28/7/2025
Not suitable for accurate measurement.
Projection: Web Mercator EPSG 102100 (3857)
For more information, visit https://qldglobe.information.qld.gov.au/help-info/Contact-
us.html
Includes material © State of Queensland 2025. You are responsible for ensuring that
the map is suitable for your purposes. The State of Queensland makes no
representation or warranties in relation to the map contents and disclaims all liability.
If imagery is displayed, imagery includes material © CNES reproduced under license
from Airbus DS, all rights reserved © 21AT © Earth-i, all rights reserved, © Planet Labs
PBC, 2023
Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Manufacturing, and Regional
26°26'11"S 153°1'26"E 26°26'11"S 153°1'32"E and Rural Development
Page 17
Doonana Waste Management Facility
Existing exemped clearing (yellow) and additional exemption (white line) aqrea is 235.53 sq.m. which is exempted development
Legend Attribution
Includes material © State of Queensland (Department of Resources); ©
Vegetation management Land parcel label - gt 10 Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia); © 21AT, © Earth-i, all rights
reserved, 2025.
regional ecosystem map ha
labels © State of Queensland (Department of Resources) 2023
© State of Queensland (Department of Natural Resources and Mines,
Land parcel label - gt 1000 Manufacturing and Regional and Rural Development) 2025
Category A or B area ha
© State of Queensland (Department of Resources) 2024
containing endangered
© State of Queensland (Department of Natural Resources and Mines,
Places: My Places(1) Manufacturing and Regional and Rural Development) 2024
Category A or B area My Place 3
containing of concern
Roads and tracks
Motorway
Category A or B area that Highway
is least concern
Secondary
Connector
Category C or R area
Local
containing endangered
Restricted Access Road
Mall
Category C or R area
containing of concern Busway
Bikeway
Restricted Access
Category C or R area that
Bikeway
is of least concern
Walkway
Restricted Access
Land parcel Walkway
Parcel Non-vehicular Track
Land parcel - gt 1 ha Track
Parcel Restricted Access Track
Land parcel - gt 10 ha Ferry
Parcel Proposed Thoroughfare
Land parcel - gt 1000 ha Green bridges
Parcel
Land parcel label Bridges
Land parcel label - gt 1 ha Tunnels
Railway stations