Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

Avocet Pde OPW - App E Slope · OPW20/0092

of 60

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

AUSTRALIAN GEOGUIDE LR7 (LANDSLIDE RISK)

 

LANDSLIDE RISK

 

 

 

Concept of Risk

Risk is a familiar term, but what does it really mean? It
can be defined as “a measure of the probability and
severty of an adverse effect to health, property, or the
environment.” This definition may seem a _ bit
complicated. In relation to landslides, geotechnical
Practitioners (GeoGuide LR1) are required to assess
risk in terms of the likelihood that a particular landslide
will occur and the possible consequences. This is called
landslide msk assessment. The consequences of a
landslide are many and varied, but our concems
normally focus on loss of, or damage to. property and
loss of life.

Landslide Risk Assessment

Some local councils in Australia are aware of the
potential for landslides within their jurisdiction and have
responded by designating specific ‘landslide hazard
zones”. Development in these areas is often covered
by special regulations. If you are contemplating
building, or buying an existing house, particularly in a
hilly area, or near cliffs, go first for information to your
local council.

Landslide risk assessment must be undertaken by

a _geotechnical practitioner. It may involve visual
inspection, geological mapping, geotechnical

investigation and monitoring to identify:
* potential landslides (there may be more than
one that could impact on your site)
the likelihood that they will occur
the damage that could result
the cost of disruption and repairs and
the extent to which lives could be lost.

Risk assessment is a predictive exercise, but since the
ground and the processes involved are complex,
prediction tends to lack precision. If you commission a

landslide risk assessment for a particular site you
should expect to receive a report prepared in
accordance with current professional guidelines and in
a form that is acceptable to your local council, or
planning authority.

Risk to Property

Table 1 indicates the terms used to describe risk to
property. Each risk level depends on an assessment of
how likely a landslide is to occur and its consequences
in dollar terms. “Likelihood” is the chance of it
happening in any one year, as indicated in Table 2.
“Consequences” are related to the cost of repairs and
temporary loss of use if a landslide occurs. These two
factors are combined by the geotechnical practitioner to
determine the Qualitative Risk.

TABLE 2: LIKELIHOOD

   

Rare 1-100,000

The terms “unacceptable”. “may be tolerated”, etc. in
Table 1 indicate how most people react to an assessed
risk level. However, some people will always be more
prepared. or better able. to tolerate a higher risk level
than others.

Some local councils and planning authorities stipulate a
maximum tolerable level of risk to property for
developments within their jurisdictions. in these
Situations the risk must be assessed by a geotechnical
practitioner. |f stabilisation works are needed to meet
the stipulated requirements these will normally have to
be carried out as part of the development, or consent
will be withheld.

TABLE 1: RISK TO PROPERTY

 

Qualitative Risk | Significance - Geotechnical engineering requirements

 

Very high | VH | Unacceptable without treatment. Extensive detailed investigation and research, planning and
implementation of treatment options essential to reduce risk to Low. May be too expensive and not
practical. Work likely to cost more than the value of the property.

 

High H | Unacceptable without treatment. Detailed investigation, planning and implementation of treatment
options required to reduce risk to acceptable level. Work would cost a substantial sum in relation to

the value of the property.

 

May be tolerated in certain circumstances (subject to regulator's approval) but requires
investigation, planning and implementation of treatment options to reduce the nsk to Low.
Treatment options to reduce to Low risk should be implemented as soon as possible.

Moderate M

 

Usually acceptable to regulators. Where treatment has been needed to reduce the risk to this

Low | | Jevel, ongoing maintenance is required.

 

 

 

 

Very Low | VL | Acceptable. Manage by normal slope maintenance procedures.

 

172 Australian Geomechanics Vol 42 No 1 March 2007

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
8.1 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Avocet Pde OPW - App E Slope.pdf · 8.1 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.