Council archive · source document
08/1981 - Preliminary Building Approval - Demolition [As Published] · 172008.1981
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1897 . . . IDAS Assessment Checkist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2006 PWITHIN THE LIMITS.OF A POR Teerseate is yo Ree 14 ls any part of the premises within the limits of a port un under the Transport ‘hirasiuctre Act 19947 BINo-cotoars [Yes If yes, is that part of the premises below high water mark? (CINo - (11 Yes - if answers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule 8 — Answer (a) to (c) below. This application requires assessment by the Port ‘Authority for the land. if you answer no to (a), (b) and * (¢) below, the Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Advice Agancy. (a) !s any part of thé proposal within 200m of a shipping channel or an entry and exit shipping corridor for the Port? CINo oO Yes — The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. (b) Is any part of the pro within 1,000m of a swing basin, a commercial fishing whar, a mooring, anchorage or spoil grounds? (I No Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency, (c) 4s any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a planned port facility identified in a land use plan? CINo C1 Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. P Reputation, schedule 2, lacio 2. Hams 15 arid 16. | COMMUNITY.INFRASTRUCTURE = - ‘Does any part of the premises adjoin a declared fi sh habitat area under the Fisheries Act 19947 No = Goto 1.6 Yes - if answers (0 questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule 8, this application requires assessment by the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPI&F). I DPI&F is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Advice Agency. IP Raguiation, schedule 2, table 2, itam 26, She Os 16 1s any part of the premises designated for community infrastructure? IRLNo- Gotoar.7 [Yes tyes, is the community infrastructure intended to be provided by a public sector entity? No C1 Yes Ityes, is the land owned by or on behalf of the State? Yes [No If no, is the development for the folowing? foe, \ (i) For the designated purpose CINo (Yes (li)’ Carried out by, or on behalf of, the designator ONo (Yes Itno to either or both (i) or (ii) above, is the proposed development assessable under the planning scheme? OONo 7 Yes - This application must be referred fo the Queensland Govemment department administering the Act authorising the development for the designation as Concurrence Agency. IP Rexqutation, schaduio 2, table 3, fom 7. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT? 1.7 Does the proposal involve the establishment or expansion ee a waste water + disposal system? BR] No - End of Sections (_] Yes Ityes, is any part of the disposal system proposed to be located i inan area declared tobea catchment area under the Water Act 2000? ([] No - End of Section 1 Yes It yes, is the proposed waste water disposal system an environmentally relevant actiity (ERA) under the Environmental Protection Act 1994? D1 Yes - End of Section 1 - [] No if no, is the proposed development involving the waste water disposal system assessable under the planning scheme? LINo - End of Section 1 (01 Yes - This application requires assessment by the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW) as Concurrence Agency. End of Section 1. IP Regulation, schedule 2. wble 2, ere 5. Page 4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/1981 - Preliminary Building Approval - Demolition [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.7 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.