Council archive · source document
Attachment 5 - Traffic Impact Assessment Final PTT · 132005.638.06
PRACTICE NOTE
GAP ACCEPTANCE AT UNSIGNALISED INTERSECTIONS
As outlined above, Austroads guidance suggests that REFERENCES
even the highest value of this calibration factor (ie
Austroads (1993). Guide to Traffic Engineering
“high”) is likely to be conservative. Therefore, the
Practice Part 6: Roundabouts, Sydney.
recommended approach is likely to be highly
conservative. Austroads (2020). Guide to Traffic Management Part
3: Transport Study and Analysis Methods, Sydney.
TABLE 1: CALIBRATION FACTOR SELECTION
Austroads (2023). Guide to Road Design Part 4A:
OPPOSING FLOW RATE CALIBRATION FACTOR VALUE Unsignalised and Signalised Intersections, Sydney.
0 – 625 pcu/h None Austroads (2023). Guide to Road Design Part 4B:
Roundabouts, Sydney.
626 – 1,250 pcu/h Low
Li, Y., Hao, H., Gibbons, R., & Medina, A. (2022).
1,251 – 1,875 pcu/h Medium
Analyzing Intersection Gap Acceptance Behavior with
1,876+ pcu/h High Naturalistic Driving Data. National Surface
Transportation Safety Centre for Excellence, Virginia.
Tian, Z., et al. (2000). A Further Investigation on
Critical Gap and Follow-Up Time. In Fourth
International Symposium on Highway Capacity (pp.
397-408), 27 June to 1 July 2000, Hawaii.
DISCLAIMER
The material contained in this practice note is of a
general nature, for information only. PTT accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any error or
omission contained herein.
L:\MARKETING\CORPORATE MATERIAL\PRACTICE NOTES\PTT_PN_19_GAP ACCEPTANCE.DOCX
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Attachment 5 - Traffic Impact Assessment Final PTT.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 9.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.