Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix B - Amended Biome Consulting Response

Attached to the e-mail Amended Biome Report - stormwater in addition to Information Response - MCU170551 - 20 Trading Post Road Cooroy.msg.

of 100

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (16.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Summary

Table A and B below indicate a comparison between existing and developed flood levels and
velocities within the existing channel on site.

Table A – Flood Level Comparison

 Cross Section      Ex WSL (m AHD)        Dev WSL (m AHD)         Difference (m)
       A                98.77                  98.67                   -0.09
       B                98.58                  98.57                   -0.01
       C                98.30                  98.30                    0.00
       D                97.97                  97.95                   -0.02


As indicated in Table A there are reductions in flood levels at each cross section location within the
existing swale due to the peak flow mitigation measures proposed. It is also noted that flood levels
will be significantly lower since they overtop the left channel embankment and sheet flows across
the site boundary (under both existing and developed conditions).

Table B –Velocity Comparison

 Cross Section      Ex Velocity (m/s)     Des Velocity (m/s)      Difference (m)
       A                  0.68                  0.95                    0.26
       B                  0.73                  0.87                    0.14
       C                  0.72                  0.94                    0.22
       D                  0.69                  0.68                   -0.01


While velocities within the existing swale have been slightly increased. The design velocity is less
than 1.0m/s which is not expected to cause scour.

Proposed Channel Capacity Immediately Downstream of Culvert Outlet

A check of the capacity of the proposed channel immediately downstream of the proposed culverts
was determined using Manning’s calculations (refer to the section below). Results indicate that flood
levels during the 1% AEP storm are well below the proposed level of the Caretakers building (by
more than 2m). Therefore, in the instance that Caretaker’s building floor levels are adjusted slightly
for detailed design, the building will not be impacting by flooding from the WQCP outflows.
Log in to download the original file

Appendix B - Amended Biome Consulting Response.PDF · 16.0 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.