Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

20181085-ASC12 - Ballada Pty Ltd v North Point Brisbane & Anor [2013] QCATA 184

Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW20/0114 - Email 4 of 4 -Engineering Certificate - Engineering Drawings - QCAT Appeal - 4 Portside Crt, Noosaville.

of 16

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

5KIPGFD[#WUV.++
                                                           16



                           special resolution.15 But there was no evidence to justify the making of
                           any order against the QPCU such as that sought by the applicants. As the
                           Adjudicator observed, such questions could only be considered in the
                           context of an application seeking orders against the body corporate. The
                           applicants may well be able to pursue this grievance in due course, along
                           lines submitted by the body corporate, namely “the only remedy available
                           to the appellant… [on this issue].. is to commence a dispute resolution
                           process against the body corporate, pursuant to s 229 (3)(a) of the
                           BCCMA”.

                    Orders

                    [88]   No error of law capable of affecting the outcome has been shown.

                    [89]   The appeal should be dismissed and the decision of the Adjudicator in
                           North Point Brisbane [2012] QBCCMCmr 355 dated 7 August 2012 should
                           be confirmed.




                    15
                             Commercial Module s 117(2)




4GVTKGXGFHTQO#WUV.++QP/CTEJCV                                                    8GTKH[XGTUKQP


[OCR of page images]
Signed by AustLll
16

special resolution.'® But there was no evidence to justify the making of
any order against the QPCU such as that sought by the applicants. As the
Adjudicator observed, such questions could only be considered in the
context of an application seeking orders against the body corporate. The
applicants may well be able to pursue this grievance in due course, along
lines submitted by the body corporate, namely “the only remedy available
to the appellant... [on this issue].. is to commence a dispute resolution
process against the body corporate, pursuant to s 229 (3)(a) of the
BCCMA’.

Orders
[88] No error of law capable of affecting the outcome has been shown.
[89] The appeal should be dismissed and the decision of the Adjudicator in

North Point Brisbane [2012] QBCCMCmr 355 dated 7 August 2012 should
be confirmed.

Commercial Module s 117(2)

Retrieved from AustLII on 30 March 2020 at 16:29:45 Verify version
Log in to download the original file

20181085-ASC12 - Ballada Pty Ltd v North Point Brisbane & Anor [2013] QCATA 184.pdf · 622 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.