NPM Submission Object (Late) - Shema Marlena - MCU18/0019

 

 

NOOSA COUNCIL Notice of Submis

   

Em

To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that

be made to the assessment manager

be in writing

be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made eiectronically
state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission
state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why

6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period

ARON >

As required by the Planning Act 2016, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council's websi

and therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are published. rmesoective of whether o
they are properly made.

1. Application details

File No. MCU18/ 0019

Postal address of Land (as advertised) 52-62 Goodchap Street & 3-11 Val Crescent Noosaville

Nature of Proposed Development - Housing Type 3 Retirement and Special Needs ‘Aged Care Facility)

 

 

Full name of Submitter Shema Wav lena
Postal address (31 |13q Wicovind| weet Twos

Suburb —t2 ya din: State dd Postace

Signature(s) LZ i

3. Details of Submission
| (We), make the following submission:

1. | object to the proposed development because it will impact on the amenity of the surrounding neaghbourhood wh
Zoned Detached housing. The size and bulk of the proposed development (which is basically ome continuous buildir
taking up 11 lots) will look totally out of place on the site which is surrounded by modest residential houses.

 

2. The residential character of the area will be substantially diminished in nature as 2 result of the development.

3. This site is currently zoned Detached Housing. Having a 90 bed aged care facility on this site is in direct conflict v
the Noosa Plan. The Noosa Plan was drafted based on extensive community consultation. The community expects
the Council adheres to the Plan and does not allow development which biatantly contravenes it, such as the propos
development. Development that would be consistent with the planning scheme would be 11 dwellings over the 11 Ic
which is very different to a 90 bed aged care facility, which is commercial in nature.

4. A 90 bed aged care facility is excessive and is an overdevelopment of the site

5. | understand that the Sunshine Coast will need more aged care facilities in the future, however, they should be lo
in more appropriately zoned areas. Val Crescent is not an appropriate site for such e development.

6. The section of Goodchap Street near the hospital and Val Crescent are already under a jot of strain in terms of c:
parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for hospital staff, patients and visitors. A 90 bed facility direct _
across the road from the hospital which has up to 35 staff, visitors and commercial vehicles will exacerbate this prot
with more and more people parking on Goodchap St, Val Crescent and nearby side streets

      
 

Privacy

Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose
this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other

  
   
  

and BareRONYAcD Mth you. Council is authorised toc
Pm MAGUS, 4 opficy.

rsonal information is only accesse