Council archive · source document
Minor_Change_Req · 132001.210164.1
It is considered that the proposed changes constitute a Minor Change to the approved development. On this
basis, it is considered that the request should be dealt with pursuant to provisions outlined within Section 81 of
the Planning Act 2016.
Affected Entity
The original application was referred to The Environmental Protection Agency as a concurrence agency about
contaminated land matters (UXO mapped area). Per the referral agency’s response ‘there are no concurrence
agency requirements’, and such the proposed changes do not affect the Response. Accordingly, the State is not
considered an ‘affected entity’ in accordance with Section 80 of the Planning Act 2016.
Proceeding
We trust this correspondence provides you with sufficient information to process the application and we look
forward to receiving a positive decision from Council at your earliest convenience.
Should you have any further questions in relation to this matter, please feel free to contact me direct.
Yours faithfully,
ADAMS + SPARKES
TO WN P L ANN ING
Cameron Adams
MANAGING DIRECTOR
Encl: Amended Architectural Plans prepared by Blackburne Jackson (Attachment 1)
Page 3 of 3
Our ref: 231115
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor_Change_Req.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 458 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.