Council archive · source document
Tracy Stevens submission MCU180019 24 June 2018 · MCU18/0019
Attached to the e-mail PM Submission Object - Tracy Stevens - MCU18-0019.
5. The DA is in direct conflict with the above elements and will have a substantial negative
impact on the amenity of the residential houses which surround it, including my house
which is opposite the proposed site.
6. The current zoning for the proposed site is Detached Housing and the development is a
significant departure from the scale and character intended in the planning scheme for
Val Crescent and Goodchap Street.
7. The DA is substantially inconsistent with its immediate surroundings, which is
characterised by single dwellings. The DA’s bulk and intensity, taking up 11 lots and
comprising an area of 6742m2 and a gross floor area of 5,055m2, will totally contradict
its neighbouring houses and will look completely out of place. In essence, the DA is of
commercial scale and appearance.
8. Development that would be complaint with the planning scheme would be expected to
be 11 smaller buildings over 11 lots, which is vastly different to what is proposed.
9. As confirmed by the Applicant in its Development Assessment Report, prepared by
Project Urban, the DA is in direct conflict with Outcome 35 of the Specific Outcomes and
Probable Solutions for the Detached Housing Zone, as it does not give the physical
appearance of being one detached house. The DA will fundamentally change the nature
and character of Val Crescent which has no units or other multiple housing. The DA,
which basically consists of one very large building and runs the entire length of Val
Crescent, will have an adverse impact on the nature and streetscape of this quiet, local
residential street.
10. A 90 bed aged care facility is an overdevelopment of the proposed site. The bulk, scale
and mass of the proposed built form is excessive and will be an overwhelming presence
in the streetscape and, more particularly, to its adjoining detached residential properties.
Having 11 lots to build on is not mere justification for developing a construction of such
density and scale.
11. When contrasting the DA to the Noosa Hospital (which is located directly opposite the
site) the hospital is single storey, appropriately set back in bush land and is set on a site
with sufficient space for the development. The hospital has a similar number of beds to
the DA (92) but is much more spread out, having more than double the footprint, thus
not diminishing the amenity of its surrounding residential neighbours.
12. The design of the DA poorly integrates with the immediate neighbourhood and is visually
dominant in its presentation to the street. Its style is not in keeping with the established
built form in the immediate vicinity, being modest detached houses.
13. The DA will result in the reduction in amenity for the Noosaville community as the
presence of a large, commercial sized building nearby will make the area feel less like a
residential neighbourhood.
14. The commercial service access on Val crescent will have an adverse impact on the
amenity of the dwellings located in the nearby vicinity (such as my house) due to an
increased number of trucks and vehicles over a 24 hr period, that are not typical of a
local residential street.
15. This will be particularly the case, early in the morning and late at night, given the
following traffic movements:
3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Tracy Stevens submission MCU180019 24 June 2018.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.1 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.