Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Council archive · source document

Tracy Stevens submission MCU180019 24 June 2018 · MCU18/0019

Attached to the e-mail PM Submission Object - Tracy Stevens - MCU18-0019.

of 13

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

25.   Importantly, the additional traffic generated by the proposal will include commercial
      vehicles such as delivery trucks, vans and trade vehicles. 12.5m long heavy rigid vehicles
      will also access the site, as well as refuse collection trucks.
26.   This is an unacceptable level and type of daily traffic for a narrow local road (ending in a
      cul de sac) which, pursuant to the Planning Scheme, is only intended to service residents
      who live in the street.
27.   As a result of the increased traffic, the risk of traffic accidents involving other vehicles,
      pedestrians and cyclists will increase.

SITE ACCESS AND CAR PARKING
28.   The elements within the Noosa Plan which relate to site access and are relevant to the
      proposed development are detailed as follows:

      Noosaville Locality
      a) New uses and works are located, designed and managed to:
         ii. maintain the safety of people and works;

      Overall Outcomes with the Driveways and Carparking Code
      a) To ensure safe and reasonable access from the public road edge to and from vehicle
         accommodation and standing areas within the property;
      b) The safety of pedestrians and cyclists is protected
      e) Development does not adversely impact on existing public parking

      Specific Outcomes Relating To Driveways And Carparking & Manoeuvring For The
      Driveways And Carparking Code
       General
       O1 Vehicular access does not adversely impact on       S1.1 Vehicular access is located and designed
       safety, capacity and operations of the existing or     in accordance
       planned road network, the proposed driveway,           with AS/NZS2890.1:2004;
       cycleways or pedestrian pathway systems.               AND
                                                              S1.2 Only one footpath crossing is provided;
                                                              AND
                                                              S1.3 Driveways, have a maximum grade in
                                                              accordance with Council’s standard
                                                              requirements
       O2 Driveways and crossovers—                           S2.1 Design of the driveway across the
       a) are suitable and safe for their intended use; and   footpath is in accordance with Council’s
       b) match Council infrastructure.                       Standard Drawing requirements as
                                                              appropriate for the particular type of
                                                              development as annotated on the drawings;
                                                              AND
                                                              S2.2 Driveways are designed and
                                                              constructed in accordance with Council
                                                              Standard Drawing requirements , as
                                                              appropriate for the particular type of
                                                              development as annotated on the drawings;
                                                              AND
                                                              S2.3 The change in grades in the
                                                              driveways and ramps is in accordance with
                                                              Council’s Standard Drawing requirements.



                                                                                                              5

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.1 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Tracy Stevens submission MCU180019 24 June 2018.pdf · 1.1 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.