Council archive · source document
Minor Change Report OPW16 0303 02 (As Published) · OPW16/0303.02
TP-09 A Central Bioretention Basin as annotated by 11/11/16
Council Prepared by Hamilton Landscape
Architects
TP-10 A Bioretention Basin 2 as annotated by 11/11/16
Council
Prepared by Hamilton Landscape Architects
TP-11 A Elm Street Landscape Plan Stage 1- Part A Undated
as annotated by Council
Prepared by Hamilton Landscape Architects
TP-12 A Elm Street Landscape Plan Stage 1- Part B Undated
as annotated by Council
Prepared by Hamilton Landscape Architects
Arborist Report Palm Lakes Resort Cooroy 02 August
prepared by GTS Tree Logistics 2019
Applicant’s Request
The applicant seeks to amend the condition to update the Elm Street landscaping plans with new
plans to reflect current conditions and include a new arborist report as the approved document.
The applicant has provided civil drawings documenting the extent of works required to facilitate
stormwater overland flow paths.
The applicant states “TMR have provided a renewal to conditional approval TMR16-018981 to
carry out the necessary drainage works along the boundary of Elm Street. The arborist impact
assessment supports the removal of all trees existing where the swale is required to be reinstated.
This will ensure that the swale works can be successfully completed and mitigate any future
disturbance of the swale. Proposed replanting where the swale is located is in line with the
arborist’s recommendations, refer to Appendix C for landscape drawings.
There are additional trees outside of the swale that are in poor health and are recommended to be
removed. The assessment outlines the trees of which are in Council’s jurisdiction, as well as the
trees within TMR’s jurisdiction. TMR provided advice that they have no objection to the removal of
vegetation within the road corridor that is impacting the property provided the relevant approvals
are obtained from council. The landscape plans reflect the removal as such and provide proposed
replacement species, refer to Appendix C.
The amended landscape plans propose buffer planting along the boundary that is suitable for the
constraints of the area. The proposed vegetation is inclusive of species that will grow to reasonable
heights and do not have roots that will impact the existing acoustic fence. The chosen species also
consider the drainage works to ensure that the swale won’t be impacted.”
Assessment of Request
It is considered reasonable to accept the findings of the arborist report and civil works required and
support the change in landscaping plans. The proposed landscaping plans are generally
acceptable and any non-compliant elements have been marked-up by Council to provide the
required landscaping buffer to the Elm Street frontage.
The revised landscape plans nominates a mix of ground cover (max height ~1m) within the
landscape buffer between and including lots 142-146, 204, 205 and 212. Lots 17-139 propose tree
removal, retention, and replacement plantings. It is considered the proposed vegetation will not
Page 3 of 8
Document Set ID: 24261127
Version: 7, Version Date: 17/12/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor Change Report OPW16 0303 02 (As Published).pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 124 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.