Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Compiled Information Request Response
The original of this document is very large (65.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 83, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
ids Based on the floorspace survey outlined in the DA report, as well as other sources, derive the amount of floorspace in each activity centre, by post code and at the category level. 3. Combine steps 1 & 2 to derive the average trading levels at each activity centre/location. Recalibrate iteratively to ensure they are in line with appropriate levels, having regard to benchmarks and performance drivers, and are reflective of the composition and quality of retailers in each precinct. This methodology is obviously very detailed. Our overarching consideration has been to ensure that the distribution of turnover estimated for each centre, and hence market shares, results in a ‘systems approach’ to modelling the network of centres which is internally consistent. Specific Supermarket Impacts The Information Request calls for an analysis of the likely competitive impacts of the Noosa Civic expansion on supermarkets located in Noosaville and Noosa Junction. Ordinarily, the direct competitive effects of a proposal on an individual retailer, such as a supermarket would not be considered a matter relevant to a planning application. This is, in effect, commercial competition. Despite this, we have undertaken the analysis and provide the following outcomes: « Given the localised catchments of supermarkets, the impacts on supermarkets at Noosaville and Tewantin are likely to be 2-3% points greater than the levels shown in Table 8.5 of the DA report. ® The supermarkets in these locations are understood to trade strongly, and this level of impact is not considered likely to affect the viability of these stores, or the availability of goods and services to the communities they serve. = The higher level of impacts on the supermarkets in these locations, in percentage terms, also means that the impact on the remaining retailers in these centres would be lower than indicated in the DA report. ; URBIS 1 4 TRANSACTION DATA NOOSA RESPONSE REPORT - RETAIL ECONOMICS JUNE 2015 V2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.