Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

Response to Outstanding Issues - 65-67 Elanda Street, Sunshine Beach

Attached to the e-mail MCU21_0190 - Email 1 of 2 - Outstanding Matters - 67 Elanda Street.

of 7

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Item 5
  The gate house is still too high, but I can condition this to be in accordance with the
  QDC requirement – please amend where providing amended plans.

Response
The height of the proposed gatehouses have been reduced to a maximum of 2.8m, and
as such complies with the QDC requirements.




                                                Figure 3: Proposed gatehouse


Item 6
  Setback of the front walls and screening needs to be an average of 1 m and this area
  between the wall/fence needs to be landscaped. Please note that Noosa Plan
  requirements are not just about the amount, but the placement – ie. buffering buildings
  and within setbacks.

Response
The amended plans propose a 1m setback between the front boundary and the fenceline.
It is noted that this area is proposed to be landscaped, refer to the revised Landscape
Concept Plan prepared by Open Space Architecture.




Response to Outstanding Issues - 65-67 Elanda Street, Sunshine Beach                        5
Log in to download the original file

Response to Outstanding Issues - 65-67 Elanda Street, Sunshine Beach.pdf · 1.1 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.