0-Response to Objection Received during Public Notification Period · MCU14/0009

Page 2

Pomona Service Centre), willing agreed to realign their common boundary with Majestic
Theatre in support of restoration works carried out to the Majestic Theatre, and sought no
compensation whatsoever from the Theatre, as the Rolton’s recognise the theatre’s
significant to the Pomona Township and did not want to see the theatre suffer. Of interest
to Council, the Rolton’s have their name in a star, concreted in the pavement to the
entrance to the Majestic Theatre, in recognition of their efforts and contribution to saving
the theatre.

Objection 2

   2.   The site has sever traffic problems with cars proceeding down Hill Street into
        Factory Street at very high speeds in an area where there are no pedestrian
        crossings and apparently none intended.

        This will worsen with two tenants, employees and their customers using this
        thoroughfare and turning into the servo from both directions. Crossing the road on
        foot is already very risky. Unless a much slower speed limit is imposed and policed
        it is only a matter of time before a serious accident occurs.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 2, in accordance with Section 272 of the Sustainable Planning Act
2009, the application was referred to the Department of State Development, Infrastructure
and Planning (DSDIP) for assessment by the State Assessment and Referral Agency
(SARA), whereby the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR), as a Technical
Agency for the proposed development, assessed the application in accordance with the
applicable provisions of the Transport and Infrastructure Act 1994 and the department’s
current policies. Subsequently, the department, on the 11 February 2015 issued their
Concurrence Agency Response – with conditions.

Accordingly, the department have approved the proposed development (subject to
compliance with their conditions).

Objection 3

   3.   Car parking appears inadequate. Eight spaces do not seem sufficient for tenants,
        staff and customers. We do understand that this meets Council requirements.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 3, the proposed development complies with the required car
parking rates, as stipulated in accordance with 14.115 Minimum Vehicle Parking
Requirements of Division 13 – Driveways and Car Parking Code of the Noosa Plan. In this
regard, 1 space per 30m2 of use area for areas up to 150m2 is required for Type 2
Industrial.

As demonstrated by the Design Plans prepared by Brad Read Design Group, each Type 2
Industrial tenancy comprises 100m2 total gross floor area. Therefore, in accordance with
the provisions of the Noosa Plan, a total of six (6) car spaces are required, which has been
provided by the proposed development.

Objection 4

   4.   Staff at the Pomona Medical Centre have complained that when buses are parked
        outside the theatre vehicles leaving the Medical Centre are unable to see

Page 3

         approaching traffic. We therefore allow bus drivers to offload their often elderly
         passengers outside the building, but ask them to move the bus once they are all
         safety on the footpath.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 4, the applicant’s acknowledge this objection raised by the
submitter; however, this objection has no relevant to the proposed development.

Objection 5

    5.   If the sheds are to be made with steel rooves, the heat generated by the close
         proximity to the theatre and the reflection of heat to both the green room
         (dressing room, bathroom, relaxation area for entertainers backstage) and the
         stage itself would be unbearably hot and render the theatre virtually unusable
         during the summer months.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 5, the Rolton’s bring to Council’s attention that the Majestic
Theatre features a steel roof; the construction of which promotes hot air to rise (the law of
thermodynamics), and the internal spaces in question (the green room and the stage) are
typically utilised of a night. Therefore, whilst the Rolton’s acknowledged the concerns of
the Majestic Theatre, the natural cooling/heating of the existing theatre has no relevance
to the proposed development.

Objection 6

    6.   The Majestic Theatre has excellent acoustics and sound travels through the
         auditorium as though it is ‘wired’. Any noise produced by industrial tenants close
         to the theatre will impact negatively on any performance being conducted.
         Industrial businesses sometimes work at night and attendant noise, such as
         grinding, hammering etc. would be disastrous as would any fumes produced.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 6, the Type 2 Industrial Uses (x 2) will be subject to hours of
operation, to be conditioned by Council. In this regard, the proposed development will
adhere to hours of operation, and will not operate outside of the conditioned hours.

Objection 7

    7.   We (Majestic Theatre) are currently landscaping our back garden and are in the
         process of submitting an application to have our liquor license extended to this
         area to provide a pleasant outdoor gathering place for events, such as weddings.
         We have been required to produce a qualified sound audit because Pomona has
         been described as ‘noise sensitive’. Will the owners be required to provide a
         similar audit? What noise levels are likely to be permitted under the MCU if
         approved?

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 7, the Type 2 Industrial Uses (x 2) will be subject to noise
limitations, to be conditioned by Council. In this regard, the proposed development will
adhere to hours of operation, and will not operate outside of the conditioned hours.

Page 4

Objection 8

    8.   The height of the shed backing onto the boundary on the right hand side would
         impede the flow of air through our green room windows and look unsightly no
         matter what the construction.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 8, the Rolton’s advise that the windows in question are painted
white on the outside and green on the inside (hence, the green room), thereby rendering
visibility through these windows impossible given the windows have been intentionally
blocked out. Furthermore, the Rolton’s wish to add that they have never witnessed the
windows in question being open, and have presumed they were bolted shut. Included
within Figure 1 of this response is a photograph of the building façade (north eastern
side) of the Majestic Theatre.

Objection 9

    9.   The Majestic Theatre was built in 1921. It relies on drawing air in through an
         opening at the bottom of the interior walls and up through the building to vented
         roof capping where it’s expelled. It is not a candidate for modern air conditioning.
         The cooling is currently non-impacting on power and environment. For this to
         work the building needs to be surrounded by air movement. What are the exact
         measurements of the corridor left at the side and back of the theatre by the
         industrial sheds?

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 9, the Rolton’s advise that the roof capping of the Majestic
Theatre was conditioned as part of the Development Approval for Preliminary Building
Works, as approved by Council on the 26 June 2006; a copy of which is included within
Appendix A of this response for Council’s ease of reference. In this regard, Section 2.0
Scope of Works, details the scope of refurbishment works relevant to the Majestic Theatre,
specifically, “re-roof existing building with custom orb roofing to include superstructure to
correct bow in roof” (refer to Appendix A of this response).

Objection 10

    10. We are already subjected to major inconveniences in the form of late fuel
        deliveries some Saturday nights when shows are taking place. Patrons have left
        the building during performances because of asthma and other medical issues and
        there has been much alarm over the stench of petrol in the auditorium. We have
        not complained, but it does impact very negatively.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 10, the Rolton’s advise Council that fuel deliveries typically take
place between 5:00pm – 6:00pm every Saturday, and further advise that the service
station has been in operation for 69 years, whereby the Rolton’s have owned and operated
the site for 13 years. Over the 13 years the Rolton’s have never been advised that fuel
deliveries have impacted on the health of patrons of the Majestic Theatre.

It is worth mention, that the Rolton’s rope off the Pomona Service Centre every Saturday
night to prevent cars associated with the Majestic Theatre from parking on the premises,
primarily to ensure that access is not hindered by park cars for fuel delivery vehicles

Page 5

servicing the site and that damage to pumps does not result, and also to ensure the safety
of the patrons of the Majestic Theatre is upheld.

Objection 11

   11. Obviously we have no idea when construction will take place and how long it will
       take, or how much noise/pollution will be involved. Theatre events are sometimes
       booked 12 months in advance. How are we meant to plan ahead for construction
       and operational works to take place? We could risk legal action from customers if
       we try and cancel pre-booked events and also if noise/pollution adversely affects
       performances.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 11, the Rolton’s are more than willing to work in conjunction with
the Majestic Theatre to mitigate, as much as possible, acoustic generated by on-site
construction work relating to the development of the Pomona Service Centre.
Furthermore, the development of the site will comply and conform to Council’s conditions
of approval, specifically, adhering to hours of construction.

Objection 12

   12. How is a volunteer run community theatre meant to survive income losses which
       would be very likely to occur during this phase?

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 12, the Rolton’s feel this objection is based on pure assumption,
and they welcome the Majestic Theatre to produce budget forecast information to support
this claim. As expressed in response to Objection 11, the Rolton’s are more than willing to
work with the Majestic Theatre to ensure minimal disturbance to the theatre occurs.

Objection 13

   13. Is there any compensation in place for this?      Not a flippant question, as such
       income losses could create genuine hardship.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 13, the applicant’s acknowledge this objection raised by the
submitter; however, this objection has no relevant to the proposed development. If this
were the case, all adjoining landowners to development sites could seek compensation.

The Rolton’s were tolerant and understanding whilst renovations works to save the
Majestic Theatre were undertaken back in 2006/2007. In this regard, construction workers
would park on the Rolton’s land, and a dividing fence was removed, and was not reinstated
for a period of over three (3) months, exposing the Pomona Service Centre to security
risk.

Objection 14

   14. In a phone discussion between our President, Robyn Jones and Senior Town
       Planner, Danya Cook of Murray & Associates, Danya stated that efforts are made
       to ensure that new buildings confirm to the style/character of adjacent heritage
       listed sites. However, we won’t know what the materials are until the building

Page 6

       permit goes in and it will be too late to object if they are aesthetically unsightly or
       unsuitable in other ways.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 14, the intensification of the Pomona Service Centre (i.e. the
establishment of two (2) Type 2 Industrial uses on site) will be constructed of traditional
building materials and finishes to ensure that the development is sympathetic to the ‘rural
country town feel’ characteristic of the Pomona Township.

Objection 15

   15. Our president has discussed this development with Mary Burns of the Heritage and
       Environmental Protection Agency, who played a major role in heritage listing the
       Majestic Theatre with the national trust. Mary advised that this agency no longer
       plays a part in the decision making process re development close to heritage listed
       properties, in fact, the department is now in caretaking mode. Should Council be
       interested in their opinion they would give it on request, but cannot intervene
       directly. It appears that the national trust is in a similar position.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 15, the Rolton’s acknowledge the heritage values of the Majestic
Theatre, hence the Rolton’s willingness to assist restoring the Majestic Theatre in 2006, by
agreeing to realign their common boundary with the Majestic Theatre, and by not seeking
compensation for the transfer of land that took place.

Objection 16

   16. The Majestic Theatre has existed in this locality for 94 years, we are assuming long
       before Council zoning. An enormous amount of blood, sweat and tears has been
       invested by volunteers to save it, maintain it and keep it alive and thriving and our
       efforts have been successful against many odds, often with the support of Noosa
       Council for which we have been grateful. We ask that you consider this when
       making your decision about the proposed adjoining development and the possible
       ramifications for our projects and other business and tourism in the town.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 16, the applicant’s acknowledge this objection raised by the
submitter; however, this objection has no relevant to the proposed development.

Objection 17

   17. We have two very experienced organ builders working voluntarily to install a
       donated 1937 all original English Compton pipe organ in our chamber which will be
       a very fine instrument, way surpassing the quality of the old Compton hybrid put
       together by Ron West, which was disable by the storm cell floods in February
       2012. The installation is being followed nationally by strong supported organ
       societies and it will be on a par, if not better than the installations at Goma and
       Kelvin Grove College. It will add immensely to the cultural and heritage values of
       the Majestic and also greatly increase visitor numbers. It will be tragic if the organ
       chamber is a couple of metres from the wall of industrial sheds and attendant
       noise.

Page 7

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 17, the applicant’s acknowledge this objection raised by the
submitter; however, this objection has no relevant to the proposed development. It is
more likely that the tenants of the Pomona Service Centre site will be impacted by organ
acoustics generated by the Majestic Theatre, given the low industrial nature that Type 2
Industrial uses cater for.

Objection 18

      18. We are confused about conflicting opinions re flooding to our site from the
          development. It is proposed that raising the fire walls to the height of the Majestic
          flood will overcome damming of floodwater from 1 Factory Street. However, it also
          will enable fire to travel from 1 Factory Street under the fire walls. Clarification of
          this issue would be appreciated.

Applicant’s Response

In response to Objection 18, the proposed buildings will be established on raised floors,
similar to the Majestic Theatre, to allow flood waters to pass under the structures in the
event of a flood.

3.0        FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS

Following Council’s review of the submission, Council raised three (3) outstanding issues of
concern, as follows:

      1.   Separation between the buildings. Please provide either more graphical justification
           for the nil setback to the Majestic Theatre, or provide for a minimum of 1m setback
           to the property boundary for the new southern tenancy in order to get appropriate
           landscaping and separation between buildings.
      2.   Please provide better elevation and renderings showing how the development fits
           in with the existing streetscape, particularly with the theatre.
      3.   Engineering also have a few issues, however we will have to wait until DTMR
           formally respond to see what the implications are in regards to
                a. Driveway turning on the road reserve.
                b. Frontage works

The Rolton’s have considered Council’s outstanding issues and have expressed a
willingness to agree to a 1 metre setback, to be measured from the common dividing
boundary, to the proposed tenancies located on the Pomona Service Centre site. The
Rolton’s request that Council condition setback requirements as a plan amendment within
the Decision Notice.

The Rolton’s likewise request that Council condition additional elevations demonstrating
how the development fits in with the existing streetscape, particularly, the Majestic
Theatre, as a plan amendment within the Decision Notice.

DTMR have now formally issued their Concurrence Agency Response (subject to
conditions), whereby the Rolton’s have no objections to complying with.

Page 8

4.0     SUMMARY

We thank Council for the opportunity to provide a response to the issues raised within the
objection received during the public notification period, and we look forward to receipt of a
favourable Decision Notice in due course. Should Council wish to discuss this matter
further please do not hesitate to contact Danya Cook on (07) 5441 2188.

Yours faithfully,




Danya Cook B.Urb. Reg. Plan, M.P.I.A., CPP, MDIA
Senior Town Planner
MURRAY & ASSOCIATES (QLD) PTY LTD

Page 9

                                                                    Figures


1.   Building Façade (north eastern side) of the Majestic Theatre


[OCR of page images]
MURRAY&
ASSOCIATES

SURVEYORS & TOWN PLANNERS

 

 

Figures

 

1. Building Facade (north eastern side) of the Majestic Theatre

Page 10

FIGURE 1— Building Façade (north eastern side) of the Majestic Theatre


[OCR of page images]
 

 

 

MURRAY&
ASSOCIATES

SURVEYORS & TOWN PLANNERS

 

FIGURE 1— Building Facade (north eastern side) of the Majestic Theatre

 

Page 11

                                                                       Appendix A



Proposal to Rectify Infringement and Development Approval for
Preliminary Building Works and Reconfiguring Lots (Boundary
Realignment) – 2006/1097


Issued by Shaun Joseph Walsh on 16 February 2006 and Noosa Council on the 26 June
2006

Page 12

Shaun Joseph Walsh

Planning
Landscape
Environment

 

16 February 2006

Keith and Christina Rolton
PO Box 291
Cooroy QLD 4563

Dear Sir /Madam

Proposed Boundary Alteration to rectify infringement of Majestic Theatre onto
Service Station site, Factory Street Pomona

I am a consultant acting on behalf of the owners (Ron West) and lessees (Pomona Arts
and Tourism Inc) of the Majestic Theatre in Factory Street Pomona. The Majestic
Theatre is adjacent to the BP Service Station in Factory Street Pomona, and Noosa
Council rate records indicate that you are the owner of the service station site.

You may be aware that survey plans for the locality indicate that the Majestic Theatre
building infringes approximately 1.5 metres onto the eastern boundary of your site. This
situation has existed for some decades, dating back to when Harold Bazzo owned both
sites. 4

My clients would like to propose a solution to the problem — a boundary alteration and
land swap that ensures the Majestic Theatre is within its own site, and provides the
service station with additional land.

The attached diagram illustrates the proposal. It is intended that the area of land
exchange be roughly equal.

The main reason for the alteration is to ensure the Majestic Theatre is on clear title.
Major refurbishment and restoration of the theatre is planned in the near future, and
resolution of the issue will ensure easier planning and building applications, insurances,
and easier access to government funds for restoration.

The proposed boundary alteration would be at no cost to yourself. My clients would be
willing to arrange and pay for detailed survey. applications to Council, lodgment of
amended title plans and conveyancing.

Page 13

If you are agreeable to the idea, the best first step would be for all parties to meet on site
and further consider the exact boundary location. I can be contacted on 0407 640 678 or
3391 6167 to arrange a mutually convenient time to meet and discuss this idea further.

Yours faithfully,

MULE

Shaun Walsh

Page 14

        

 

<p? _ yore
Axepunog] oIqISsOg.

| eo La
__SoysalejA Jo SIpuMO 04

pasiaysuery pred sTqy

 

Ss

 

Page 15

 

If telephoning or calling please ask for:
Hannah Blue, 0754495183
Email: [email protected]
Application Ref: 2006/1097

Your Ref:

28 June 2006

Pomona Progress Art Tourism Inc
10 Station Street
POMONA QLD 4568

Dear Sir/Madam,

Re: Application for a Development Approval for Preliminary Building Works
assessed under the Planning Scheme and Reconfiguring a Lot - Boundary

Alignment situated at 1 - 3 Factory Street, Pomona described as Lots 1 — 2
RP 35078

| refer to your application and advise that on 26 June 2006 Council decided to approve
the application and grant a Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot and
Preliminary Approval for Building Work, subject to conditions.

Details of the decision are contained in the attached Decision Notice.

You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal
provisions from the Integrated Planning Act is also attached.

During the appeal period, you as the applicant may make written representations to
Council about the conditions contained within the development approval. !f Council
agrees with the representations, a “negotiated decision notice” will be issued. Only one
“negotiated decision notice” may be given. Taking this step will defer your appeal
period, which will continue after Council makes its decision. (Section 3.5.17 and 3.5.18
refer).

Should you wish to obtain more information about Council's decision, the reports and
staff recommendations regarding this application are available for viewing or purchase
at the Level 2 counter of Council offices. It would assist Council staff if you could bring
this letter with you.

Yours faithfully,
Hannah Blue
PLANNING OFFICER

Encl: Decision Notice

Award Winner - Australian Clean Beach NOOSA COUNCIL aenereionsie

2004 Li ventio 9 Pelican Street Tewantin PO Box 141 Tewantin Q 456°
Challenge 2004 Litter Prevention Phone: 07 5449 5200 Fax: 07 5447 1062
Email: [email protected]

Page 16

GQ] NOOSA

NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice , 3 of 6

 

  
   

Noosa Council Conditions

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997, IDAS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

COUNCIL

 

Land Use

1.

Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans
of development. The approved plans are numbered PDO1 to PD05 (as amended in black pen), prepared
by Middap Ditchfield Pty Ltd and dated August 2005; and Part 2 Scope of Works contained within

Refurbishment Plan, prepared by the applicant and dated May 2006, and as may be amended by these
conditions.

The development must be undertaken and operated in a manner that causes no detrimental effect-upon

the amenity of the neighbourhood by reason of the creation of excessive noise, lighting nuisance or other
emissions. , .

The disabled access ramp located within the road reserve shall be constructed of materials and colours
consistent with the traditional building fagade.

The construction timing, transport, access, storage and use of materials adjacent to the building are

managed to avoid adversely impacting on the theatre structure,

Advertising devices located on the site are designed and sited so as to:-

5.1. Be compatible with the building form, materials and colours of the theatre;

5.2. Do not obscure the appearance or prominence of the site when viewed from Station Street;

5.3. Comply with Council’s policies on advertising.

’ The Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot and Building Work assessable against the Planning

Scheme lapses if the use has not happened by 26 June 2008 unless an application to extend the currency
is approved by Council.

Land Development

10.

11.

Boundary Realignment

For the purpose of these conditions, the following definitions apply: -

7.1. A Plan of Survey means the plan for the reconfiguration of a lot required to be endorsed by
: Council pursuant to S3.7.1 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997.

7.2. The person acting on this permit means any person or company who undertakes development
pursuant to this permit.

The lot reconfiguration shall be generally in accordance with the plan titled “Boundary Realignment’ dated
16/6/2006 as submitted by Shaun Joseph Walsh.

In conjunction with the lodgement of the Plan of Survey for Council endorsement, legal documentation
shall be presented to Council and shall be submitted in the correct form with the fees prescribed in
Council's adopted fee schedule.

Pursuant to Section 3.7.3(3)(b) of the Integrated Planning Act, all outstanding rates and charges due and

payable to Noosa Council in respect of the lots being reconfigured shall be paid prior to endorsement of
the Plan of Survey.

Prior to undertaking any excavation, the person acting on this permit shall contact public utility service
providers to ascertain the location of their underground services,

SEP p:\civica\documenis\da\0 1 0\from1000\0 1 0-2006-00001097-001\0006decnotice.doc

Page 17

NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice 40f6

12. The person acting on this permit shall apply and obtain for all other necessary permits including crane

“ permits, road opening permits, hoarding permits, footpath occupation permits and/or any other approvals
required under any other Act.

General

13. Any damage caused to any public utility during the course of building works shall be repaired to Council’s
standards and at no cost fo Council.

14. — Any alteration of any public utility or other facilities necessitated by the development of the land or
associated construction works external to the site shall be at no cost to Council.

15. The transportation of all materials to and from the site shall be undertaken in a manner such that no
particle matter escapes onto a public road. All vehicles carrying materials either to or from the site shall
be covered to prevent materials including dust being windblown from the vehicle.

SEP p:\civica\documents\dd\010\from 1 000\010-2008-0000 1097-001 \0006decnotice. doc

Page 18

£5. APPLICATION TYPE

INSOLE Form 6 - Decision Notice

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

eee te INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997, $3.5.15, IDAS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
File No: 2006/1097 Date of Decision: 26 June 2006
iq. APPLICANT DETAILS , " a —_
Name: Pomona Progress Art Tourism Inc
Postal address:

10 Station Street
POMONA QLD 4568

Phone no: Fax no:
[2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ‘ I

Street address: 1 - 3 Factory Street, Pomona

Real property Lots 1 & 2 RP 35078 Parish of Tuchekoi
description:

£3, OWNERDETAILS = ~—

ainpeen LEAP eeeRta nad

 

 

Name: 1. Keith Anthony Rolton & Christina May Rolton & 2. Ron K West
Postal address: 1. PO Box 291 2. 3 Factory Street
COOROY QLD 4563 POMONA QLD 4568
[-4, REFERRAL AGENCIES ™“ a
Referral Agency Address Basis
Nit

se se ARENA RRA NAN SNORE AOE MN caverns Sn we

Retcnan AANA RN rte AA Re

 

2 GRIER BIO ad coe: MC

 

 

 

Development Development Details Preliminary Development
Approval Permit
Reconfiguring a Lot & Building Building Works assessed under Yes No
Works the Planning Scheme
Reconfiguring a Lot - Boundary No Yes
Realignment
[6  DECISIONDETALS —— %

 

Council decided to approve the application and grant a Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot and
Preliminary Approval for Building Work, subject to conditions.

iT. APPLICABLE CODES —

 

 

 

 

The developer must comply with the 3 following codes for self- assessable development related to the development
approved under this Development Permit:-

Advertising Devices Code.

   

SUBMISSION

Not applicable.

  

  

Page 19

NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice

 

 

 

 

 

20f6
[9. CONDITIONS “ — ~~ ~ Tt
The approval is subject to conditions. Noosa Council's conditions are attached.
(40. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED i
Type of Development Permit required Subject of the required Development Permit
Development Permit for Building Works All building work

[ 11. RIGHTS OF APPEAL . ™ —_—_—

Rights of appeal in relation to this application are attached.

(42. ASSESSMENT MANAGER Oo |

Name: Noosa Council Signature: KOK Date: 28/06/2006

SEP p:\civica\documents\da\01 O\from1 000\01 0-2006-00007097-001\0006deenotice.doc

 

Page 20

NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL

PLANS APPROVED

 

2.0, Scope of Works

The scope of refurbishment works are indicated on the plans in Appendix A and are
described as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administration Not | General Ensure efficient $10 000
marked | Administration management and
administration of project
Undertake A Amend boundary | Building is partly located | $8000
boundary . : over adjacent parcel of Negotiations with
alteration land adjacent land owner,
Survey, Applications to
Council and Title
Office,
Undertake Not | Undertake other Statutory compliance $55 000
required planning, | marked | required planning, ’ | Planning consultancy,
building health building health architectural
applications applications consultancy, application
: fees, see
Building works Not | Engage building Statutory:compliance $5000
certification marked | certifier :
Removal of stored |" Not | Remove To allow use of theatre to | $8000.
items marked | unnecessary stored | full extent. Labour, Hire of skips
: items from theatre . ‘ :
Re-roofing of B Re~roof existing | Existing roof is in poor $70 000
building . building with state. Materials, labour
custom orb roofing
Includes
“superstructure” to
: correct bow in roof
Completion of : Not | Completion of Ensure stability of $40 000
restumping. marked | restumping building foundations Materials, labour
Completion of Not | Completion of Ensure electrical safety $30 000
rewiring marked | rewiring . Materials, labour
Reconstruction of Cc Reconstruct and Allows better functioning | $60 000
roof over stage raise roof over stage area Materials, labour
stage area , ; ,
Raise floor level D Raise floor level to | Allows better functioning | $40 000
at south of match rest of off stage area Materials, labour
existing stage theatre . 1
Reconstruct E Reconstruct Allows functioning of $5000
loading dock at ° decking and install | rear loading dock. Materials, labour
se tte nde Teen Font 3

 

 

 

Page 21

NOOSA BHIRE C COUNCIL

PLANS APPROVED
SIGNATURE: MEL,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DAT Ei. sssssssterescsessersessneceencenstene
‘rear of theatre handrails.
Construct F Lower floor area Allows orchestra / band $30 000
orchestra pit adjacent to stage to perform without Materials, labour
, obstructing audience view :
Construct organ G Construct areas to’ | Allows use of existing $25 000
areas house twin organs, | organs Materials, labour
either by lowering :
floor area or partly
raise roof to
accommodate
organ pipes
Restore dance H Restore dance floor | Make use of reputedly $10 000
floor of sprung Crows best dance floor in the Materials, labour
Ash. region
Refurbish , I Refurbish Allows serving of $50 000
refreshment kiosk refreshment kiosk | refreshment to visitors. Materials, labour
and associated new | Generates income
commercial-kitchen
and seating areas
Install restaurant J Install restaurant Allows dining for patrons | $30 000
seating areas in seating areas in Generates income Materials, labour
previous café area previous café area
Refirbish toilets K_ | Refurbish/ - Suitable toilets for all $15 000
. increase toilets to patrons Materials, labour
meet patron.
requirements
including disabled
___ | access
Make good fire : L Ensure fire exits Existing fire exit to south | $5000
exits : meet requirements, | discharges to adjacent Analysis, design,
install additional if | property (no lawful materials, labour
; required access)
Fire separation to Not | Ensure fire Fire engineer $60 000
southern boundary | marked | separation to investigation and Investigation, design,
, southem boundary | installation of appropriate | materials labour
meets requirements | fire protection measures
Install ramp at M__| install entrance Suitable access for all $10 000
entrance disabled ramp on —_| patrons Design, materials,
/ footpath labour
Re-lay footpath N Re-lay footpath Create “boulevarde” of $4000
| paving paving to high Majestic Stars in footpath | Materials, labour
: quality hard surface
Replace theatre oO Replace theatre Allows use of theatre $20 000
seating seating with floor space for multiple Materials, labour
retractable seating | uses — consistent with
original use
Install sound light P Install sound light }) Improved theatre $20 000
desk and spotlight desk and spotlight | function. Materials. labour
fen th bin bene, fan thee Beli be

 

 

Page 22

NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL

PLANS APPROVED

SIGNATURE...

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DATE...
in the bio box } "| in the bio box ;
Reconstruct Q Reconstruct Safety and to meet $10 000
staircase to . staircase to balcony | current standards Materials, labour
balcony
General repair and | Not Repair of walls, To prevent building $50 000.
maintenance marked | repaint entire deterioration and improve | Materials, labour
including painting building internally | presentation
and;various and externally,
decoration tasks _Teplace carpet in
foyer, general
decoration, and
other general
maintenance tasks
Asbestos removal | Not Removal of To meet statutory \ $16 000
] marked | asbestosin _—._| obligations .| Specialist consultancy
accordance with :
standards
Total: | $676 000 plus
10% contingency
$743 600

 

 

 

 

Page 23

 

werner et Et ES

200d oot

vaste why

vio spy ODL

me ape
SuOpeAe

Suytug paunseogy

SAEED

eUDL

paoy Aioqey

wT

anneal, oneaieyy

areas

TeOAN Oe

am

Hp WSO YEARNS» (OTL

mauO- abated) Mad 2280 +460 (20) d
gage Gi STAAVSOON

mpeTg soa HH LAP WD

on NAb ONY UNE

eLeO- NASR | SeOL AiR ~ Os Daley
PY] Ald OTHISHOLIA VOC
saIyOy

ct
pod

 

wi
any
NS
“SO
N

iH
Ex
<
a

IRE COUNCIL.
‘PROVED

NOOSA SH
PLANS AP

2
Pp
ee
<
Z
UO
a

 
  

NOL VWAdTA Sdis

NOLWATH LadMS

 

 

 

 

a =

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANZ
iN
(ST

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

ig

snoulept

 

Page 24

B COUNCIL

SHIR.

NOOSA

oe Ji}
Rha iD:
a ped
ce sD!
Bh. “REL
ohn pS!
= gM
= << a

" wm 8

 

spun toes ra lin
$0dd 000

tka saz

nD gotny On)

ua 7 Died

et
utig leo

Burwexq] posnseayy

Teas,

Buowoed

peoy Arce}

BEAOOT

envoys onsaleyy

ete

2M WOU

baw

ET
PR UOT RMNTO HOP « [RUS

nocd rare Uo) a 22eu babe (Lot~ eel
Boh GID ATIAVSCON

RAS SUC

SOrOdr HOG uae

HAtE-PYEHOL DaILO-Geatd = Ord teu pe

PY Ald OTSHOLIC evan
BIOS yoNy

eae

  

 
  

se

NOLWAZI Ove

 

 

 

 

Page 25

SHIRE COUNCIL

 

PROVED

& AB

Oo

&

£
SIGNATURE:..

Eswupmary 24> ee

$0dd 0000

eld wee kig

wa eBay GEL

wae “wee
Sen
suaqoug

Guyaerg panseeyl -

ete
BuowWod

pray AisBy

haaea

eypauL ogso[ely

Jasons

}S8AA UY

Basted

Fatuie powrat paar + ty

S00 reKHEOP iY LEO era iL: es
geck IA TWMAECOK

fantg tawody toe Ge UD

FU My rhI Ge eg

PUPA PegTAy | OINQT: Mapes OH Hey erT

PTA CTAIHOLG dyad
Spey

nee eS

g

 

DAT Bi sven Gore lens

    
     

9 NOUsIS

ASTD

@ NOILISS

V¥ NOLLOAS

 

 

ae
nn’

 

 

 

: cc% c i = 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a
oe
TE

 

 

 

 

 

CHT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 26

 

 

boad bod

wa “aah
vo Ey DUE
2

_ aa = NV1d YCOlW

Ved JOO|s
Huei Psnseeyy

ewe

BUCO

peoy 201004
HEUYaO

eeu Opselery
ssaaye

eM ley

airs

                            

“y

TR UUDOIMRZO RED * [SUNY
1D rebs L PPYL
Bpsh OD TT

iecom mone ll

Leah Fypasok Mae tera y HE CURE
Pr Sd CTAHHOLIO dvadiin
Spey

 

 

 

 

 

 

"avVOU ANOLIVE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

fl
os :
6 Si
Ste S
(oe, Con a
sey
“ee
od
gn ee et
om <<
Owl
ae.
Ww

 

 

 

>

 

 

zevig

 

sg (rans

wagon

TOM
Yad

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 27

 

 

OVED

ecquarune LIES:

SHIRE COUNCIL

PLANS APPR

NOOSA

waa aw

“eam Gs ~ . NW1d NOOTA WddA

nel 200g Jeddry
Buynerg painseeyy
HD

BUOWIOg

peoy opey
wouy907

eu}BOl SRESLEWY

 

syOSHUONY

 

J

 

 

 

i

o1

 

 

 

 

 

Ferre g rays

 

 

 

 

PaAYOA AAOLIV

 

 

bb 0k

 

 

z

 

Page 28

 

9002 ( 91/ I
ANANWAWA ROVON Noy

ficIL
PROVED

 

NOOSA SHIRE CO

PLANS