Council archive · source document
0-Response to Objection Received during Public Notification Period · MCU14/0009
Applicant’s Response
In response to Objection 17, the applicant’s acknowledge this objection raised by the
submitter; however, this objection has no relevant to the proposed development. It is
more likely that the tenants of the Pomona Service Centre site will be impacted by organ
acoustics generated by the Majestic Theatre, given the low industrial nature that Type 2
Industrial uses cater for.
Objection 18
18. We are confused about conflicting opinions re flooding to our site from the
development. It is proposed that raising the fire walls to the height of the Majestic
flood will overcome damming of floodwater from 1 Factory Street. However, it also
will enable fire to travel from 1 Factory Street under the fire walls. Clarification of
this issue would be appreciated.
Applicant’s Response
In response to Objection 18, the proposed buildings will be established on raised floors,
similar to the Majestic Theatre, to allow flood waters to pass under the structures in the
event of a flood.
3.0 FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Following Council’s review of the submission, Council raised three (3) outstanding issues of
concern, as follows:
1. Separation between the buildings. Please provide either more graphical justification
for the nil setback to the Majestic Theatre, or provide for a minimum of 1m setback
to the property boundary for the new southern tenancy in order to get appropriate
landscaping and separation between buildings.
2. Please provide better elevation and renderings showing how the development fits
in with the existing streetscape, particularly with the theatre.
3. Engineering also have a few issues, however we will have to wait until DTMR
formally respond to see what the implications are in regards to
a. Driveway turning on the road reserve.
b. Frontage works
The Rolton’s have considered Council’s outstanding issues and have expressed a
willingness to agree to a 1 metre setback, to be measured from the common dividing
boundary, to the proposed tenancies located on the Pomona Service Centre site. The
Rolton’s request that Council condition setback requirements as a plan amendment within
the Decision Notice.
The Rolton’s likewise request that Council condition additional elevations demonstrating
how the development fits in with the existing streetscape, particularly, the Majestic
Theatre, as a plan amendment within the Decision Notice.
DTMR have now formally issued their Concurrence Agency Response (subject to
conditions), whereby the Rolton’s have no objections to complying with.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
0-Response to Objection Received during Public Notification Period.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.7 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.