Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Rhea Denbraasem - MCU25/0118
From: "rhea denbraasem" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 21:21:25 +1000
To: "Mailbox Council Mail" <[email protected]>
Subject: Submission RE MCU25/0118
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated outside of Council. Do not open links or attachments
if the email is unexpected or unusual.
TO: Assessment Manager – Noosa Shire Council 23/11/2025
RE: Application Number MCU25/0118
DESCRIPTION: Development Permit for Change of Use by Coast2Bay for Multiple Dwellings –
Affordable Rental Premises 25 x small dwellings plus one community room dwelling.
SITE ADDRESS: 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy Qld 4563 Lot 2 (part) SP348613
To whom it may concern,
I make the following submission to Council and request that this application be recommended
for refusal for the following reasons:
1. Traffic and Road Safety
My small family, that includes two toddlers, have bought in this low density no through
road on the outside of town to avoid these safety and road traffic hazards. Dianella Court
was built to service 28 homes in a low density (verge of rural) zone. It is unsafe to allow this
intersection and small no through road to service 26 more households of potentially
upwards of 50 more vehicles. In case of emergency there would be double the vehicles
trying to exit from one exit, which is a huge concern for my family. This intersection, once a
new road to service this development is added, will NOT HAVE CLEAR SITE LINES. Looking
south down Dianella court a vehicle would have to come out past No 2 Dianella court to see
anyone coming. Note: Traffic Impact Assessment at the intersection of Lake Macdonald
Drive and Dianella and Wildge court was done on a weekday for 24 hours facing only down
Dianella court and needs to be redone for more accurate representation of traffic at
intersection. Plans for intersection upgrade, which will still have clear site line problems
based on current plans, have no start date thus far (before development begins?) and won’t
be improving on safety therefore this development cannot go ahead regarding traffic safety
at this intersection.
Document Set ID: 24329285
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
Noosa Plan 2020 2.0 References:
• Strategic Framework (Part 3): Completely disregarding the broad vision for the Shire,
including maintaining community safety and managing transport impacts.
o Part 3, Strategic Framework. The objective of ensuring the safety and efficiency
of the road network for all users, particularly in low-density residential areas.
"Address peak time traffic congestion by reducing traffic rather than increasing
road capacity".
• Transport and Parking Code (Part 9, Development Codes): This code specifically
addresses traffic management and safety for new developments.
o Part 9, Development Codes and Schedule 6, Planning Scheme Policies.
Development should not have "significant adverse impacts on the traffic
network" or "local streets in the neighbourhood of the development".
o A Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) report is required to assess the "traffic
generation and movements" and its effect on the capacity of the local road
system, including "key nearby intersections". Concerns about increased vehicles
on a no-through road and during emergencies are valid points covered by this
requirement.
• Risk and Resilience (Part 8, Overlays, and supporting policies):
o Part 8, Overlays.
o Emergency access and evacuation in a potential natural disaster (e.g., bushfire,
flood - relevant for QLD) are material risks that should be considered under the
scheme's provisions for natural hazards. The safety issue of "double the vehicles
trying to exit from one exit" during an emergency is a significant planning fail.
2. Distance to Shops
Coast2Bay have applied incorrectly stating distance to local services. They have referenced
the “grocery access” being within distance required for this development and this is in
reference to a Bakery and a Subway. The closest shop for essential groceries is IGA which is
approximately 1.6 km walking distance crossing major roadways and a train bridge. The
Coast2Bay application is referencing the centre zone, but ignoring the real purpose of the plan,
which is to provide residents with reasonable and safe access to essential services.
Noosa Plan 2020 2.0 References:
Liveable Communities and Housing Code (Part 9): Requires walkable access to Essential
Services.
Document Set ID: 24329285
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Page 3
3. Built form Out of Scale
The proposed Built Form is out of scale with low-density surrounding properties. Also located
next to beginning of rural zone and a cemetery. It is inconsistent with the Cooroy Town Plan to
have medium density housing in this location. It is a low density neighbourhood all around this
development. Building this development goes completely against the strong outline in the Noosa
Plan itself that places strong emphasis on protecting local character and applying a place-based
approach to development. It sets clear expectations for building height, scale, and design to
ensure new proposals are compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood. It also prioritises
improvements to the streetscape through appropriate materials, landscaping, and design
treatments. Development within the Low Density Residential zone is restricted to a maximum of
two storeys and must contribute positively to the established “open and green streetscape”
character. Some of the buildings with parking beneath can be seen as 3 storeys by neighbouring
residents. This is actually devastating to residents who built these homes for their families in this
low density area.
4. POOR DISTRIBUTION OF SOCIAL AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING
It has been agreed upon by many councillors and council staff that affordable housing should be
in small amounts dispersed as to not overwhelm single areas. The density of this development
goes completely against this consideration for the continued amenity of all residents of the Noosa
Shire and residents who would live in these rental units.
5. PROXIMITY TO TRANSPORT
Development being allowed based on proximity to transport is completely ridiculous. They are
approximate 1.3 kilometres from nearest bus stop and train each providing only 2 daily services
at odd times. This completely rules out the development being close to accessible and useable
transport.
6. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Development application based on “not worsening” stormwater run off is a joke. The stormwater
management has been rendered completely useless in the weather events since beginning
remediation let alone when the site is mostly covered in concrete by this development. There is
no way this development, being as large and dense as it is proposed to be, will not worsen the
stormwater issue on this site. IT IS NOT FREE FROM FLOODING as application states.
7. AMENITY OF LOCAL RESIDENTS
Document Set ID: 24329285
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Page 4
This development has completely derailed our lives for so many reasons. We bought here with
our young family ready to make ours and our children’s lives in Cooroy on the outskirts of town
in a 4 bedroom house surrounded by green space, cemetery and other families. We made our
home in a low density area backing onto rural zone where we thought, on a cul de sac we would
live a quiet peaceful existence in the Noosa shire. Our dreams have been completely ripped from
under us with the development above us on the hill spanning over 2 hectares looming over us
filled with contamination. The mental health of our entire neighbourhood has been affected but
especially mine with worries for my babies and our entire future in this town. Having two storey
small units thrown up above us looking directly down at us will completely derail these hopes
and our future. The amenity of us the neighbouring residents has already been impacted so badly
by remediation let alone building 2 storeys of medium density on top of us.
I ask that you please consider these points and refuse this development as the risk to us, the
residents you are meant to serve and facilitate for is too much.
Rhea Denbraasem
21 Dianella court
Cooroy 4563
0466246088
[email protected]
Sent from my iPhone
Document Set ID: 24329285
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Used in these records
PM Submission - Rhea Denbraasem - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 160 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.