Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

Peter Alexander Noosa Planning Report · OPW16/0175

Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW16/0175.

of 13

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION                                                              PETER ALEXANDER NOOSA




                                                                       Figure 6: Locality Plan Area (Noosa Heads)

5.0 LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT

    The triggers for the development application requirements are outlined below as per Division 12, Table 9.10 of
    The Noosa Plan. As the proposal involves multiple illuminated advertising devices that can’t be considered self-
    assessable, a code assessable development application assessed against the Advertising Devices Code is
    required.

    Table 9.10 – Assessment Criteria for development other than Material Change of Use
    Operational work – placing an advertising device on premises
    Type of development                 Assessment category               Assessment criteria
    Placing an advertising device on Exempt if Low impact sign            If self-assessable— Column 2 of
    premises where not associated with                                    Table 14-41 of the Advertising
    a material change of use            Self-assessable if—               Devices Code
                                        a) General sign; or
                                        b) Medium impact sign             If code assessable— Advertising
                                                                          Devices Code
                                        Code assessable if—
                                        a) not complying with Column 2 of
                                        Table 14-41 of Advertising
                                        Devices Code; or
                                        b) High impact sign

    As per Table 14.41 of the Advertising Devices Code, the proposed advertising devices can’t be considered self
    assessable as a) the maximum signface of the window/wall sign graphic exceeds 4m2, b) the maximum
    combined sign face area of all signs exceeds 10m2, and c) there is more than 1 illuminated sign per frontage.

    Table 14-41 - Specific outcomes for the Advertising Devices Code
    Specific Outcomes                                      Acceptable solutions / Probable solutions
    14.77 General design and amenity
    O2 Advertising devices—                                S2.6 The maximum sign face area of a single sign does
    f) are compatible with the human-scale and character not exceed 4m2 on any face, unless otherwise
    of the locality in which they are situated;            specified in S6.1, S6.2, S6.4 and S6.5 below;
    g) are compatible with the scale, proportion, bulk and
    other characteristics of buildings, structures and AND
                                                                                                         Page | 6

Used in these records

About this file

File size
700 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Peter Alexander Noosa Planning Report.pdf · 700 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.