Original source · versioned page text
Traffic Report 132009.1102.01
.-
~ The importance of communicating the benefits of a well-managed parking supply to different
stakeholders.
To ensure an appropriate and well-managed parking supply, it is important to understand the
role of parking in the wider transport system. All transport systems consist of the following three
basic components:
~ Vehicles -
ego cars, trains and buses;
~ Rights-of-way -
ego roads, rail lines and bus lanes; and
~ Terminal capacity -
ego parking stations, yards, and bus depots.
Almost all cities and towns in Australia have an oversupply of under-priced parking (most of
them are free). This situation has largely resulted as an unintended consequence of minimum
parking requirements. This has contributed to a public perception that parking is and should
always be free. Indeed, many people feel aggrieved in situations where they pay for parking, and
efforts to reform parking can be met. with strong public resistance. In reality, parking is never
free. By paying nothing for parking we end up paying more for everything else.
While minimum parking requirements vary from place to place, the underlying methodology is
consistent. Minimum parking requirements are based on estimated average near-peak demand
for parking dependant on the size and type of the proposed development. The developer is then
required to provide this amount of parking on-site. Supply determined on this basis is based on
the demand for "free" parking and without any measures in place to discourage excessive use of
private motor vehicles; this generally results in an excessive amount of parking being required.
Minimum parking requirements are based on the following assumptions:
~ Parking demands are both predictable and fixed -
that is, they are easy to calculate and do
not change significantly over time or space;
~ Parking is low-cost and difficult to charge for that is, parking requirements impose minimal
-
costs on developers and should be free to users most if not all of the time; and
~ Parking demands are associated with individual sites -
that is, demand for parking is
associated with individual sites rather than being a function of the wider urban area.
The oversupply of car parking spaces in town centres and growth corridors, resulting from the
historical application of minimum requirements, has suppressed the market value of car parking
spaces such that the perceived value of a car parking space is next to nothing. The current
regulatory framework in the Council’s Planning Scheme is likely to continue exacerbating the
oversupply of parking; it includes conservative minimum standards and makes it less onerous for
developers to comply with these standards than to implement cost effective measures to reduce
parking demand.
Of course it is well understood that charging for parking in some circumstances is not
considered appropriate, but in those cases it is equally inappropriate to oversupply parking
spaces, which would in turn encourage excessive use of private motor vehicles. It is considered
to be a better engineering solution to not oversupply parking spaces by allowing some flexibility
on how and when to apply the minimum parking rate for a particular development suggested by
a planning policy.
On the Sunshine Coast this parking oversupply has led to behavioural changes that have
negative impacts on the natural social and economic environment. Minimum parking rates
supplied by developers induce people to drive to centres rather than choosing other modes as
well as drive within centres instead of walking within centres. This reduced average time spent
5102-oo2(1)-Car Parking Assessment Page 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.