Original source · versioned page text
2014-09-16 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (16.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 16 September 2014
used. Rather a site specific analysis be appropriate for the proposed location of the
should be used. potential odour sources.
• Odour associated with catch out has not
been considered.
• Meat Guidelines recommend fans are
located on the end of the sheds furthest
away from sensitive receptors.
Unable to condition the development not to The odour report shows that the development will
emit odour beyond property boundary. emit odour beyond the property boundaries
exceeding the QLD odour guidelines.
Dust concerns
Health concerns about dust from the farm The proposed dust impact has been appropriately
and effects on neighbouring water tanks. modelled and meets the recommended standards.
Council’s environmental consultant also considers
the modelling to be consistent with that seen
elsewhere (i.e. the predicted dust levels require a
smaller buffer than that required for odour).
Unable to verify the accuracy of results The meteorological data built into the dust modelling
because they are not site specific. is considered appropriate for the proposed location.
Noise Concerns
Noise from the existing avocado orchard has The noise from the avocado orcharding is an existing
not been considered in the cumulative noise use on the site and predominantly operates during
levels. day time hours and does not generally coincide with
the poultry farm’s potential noise impacts, which are
at night.
Assumptions about report The proposed on-site noise impacts have been
• Location of the background noise logger appropriately modelled and meet the recommended
would have been influenced by standards. The assumptions and criteria are
surrounding houses. considered appropriate and similar to other poultry
• Does not consider fork lifts working from operations.
all locations on the sheds.
• Does not consider the noise from the
feeding systems.
• Does not consider noise from trucks
associated with litter delivery and clean
out.
No consideration of the noise of the trucks The noise of trucks during the early morning pick up
on the road. times has not been modelled. The noise associated
with trucks along the haul route during regular
sleeping hours is likely to adversely impact the
amenity of residences along the haul route.
Traffic concerns
Dust from the trucks using Top Forestry Agreed.
Road will affect neighbour’s amenity.
Concerns about the safety of the roads. The applicant has proposed upgrading to Top
Forestry Road to improve the safety of this section,
including, widening, sealing, signposting and
reducing the speed limits. Council’s traffic consultant
considers that some additional widening is required
to address road safety.
Council will have the burden of looking after The associated traffic impacts of the development
the maintenance of the road. would increase the maintenance required on the haul
route.
Feasibility of upgrading the road for one This is a matter for the applicant.
farm.
Page 31 of 145
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.