Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

2014-09-16 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda

of 141

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (16.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                      16 September 2014


Setbacks
The part of Allambi Rise that the premises fronts is unusual as there is no footpath or green
space between the premises and road and therefore, no clear distinction between
public/private spaces. This part of Allambi Rise appears similar to a private driveway shared
by several properties. The photos in Figure 2 below show the only 3 properties that have
direct access from this part of Allambi Rise.

 Building Works Code                     Discussion

 Setbacks
 O1 Buildings and other structures
 are appropriately designed and
 sited to—
 a) provide amenity for users of the     The proposed setback does not create any overlooking or
 premises as well as preserve the        acoustic issues as there are no windows or doors facing the
 visual and acoustic privacy of          neighbours and an existing driveway provides adequate
 adjoining and nearby land uses;         separation for acoustic purposes.
 b) preserve any existing vegetation
 that will buffer the proposed
 building from adjoining uses;           There is an existing garden along the eastern boundary with
                                         plants in poor condition. A condition could be imposed to
 c) allow for landscaping to be          improve this garden with suitable native species.
 provided between buildings;
 d) maintain the visual continuity and   Given the unusual streetscape, as shown in Figure 2, there is
 pattern of buildings and landscape      no clear public/private delineation and therefore the proposal
 elements within the street;             would is not out of character with the street.
 e) for class 10a structures, do not     The garage location remains unchanged with a change to the
 visually dominate the street;           external material finish only proposed.




Figure 2 - Existing streetscape



                                                                                             Page 8 of 145
Log in to download the original file

2014-09-16 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda(PDF, 16MB).pdf · 16.6 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.