08/1787 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1787

Point 20

Point 21

Point 22

Point 28

3 cJ> Cardno

Eppell Olsen

Demonstrate how vehicles parked in proposed spaces 8 & 15 can reverse from the
space and exit the aisle in a forward gear in a total of 2 movements.

An AutoTURN drawing showing this has been prepared and is attached at Appendix C.

Demonstrate how vehicles can manoeuvre and exit the site in a forward gear if the
security gate is closed and all of spaces 1 — 2 and 9 — 15 are occupied. The
manoeuvring must be in a total of 3 movements (forward gear entry, reverse and
forward gear exit)

The security gate has been repositioned to the access driveway thereby negating this
request.

Demonstrate how a motorbike parked in the rear isolated parking space of the four can
exit the space when ail spaces are occupied.

Motorcycle parking has been amended so as there is no inaccessibility of bays should
adjacent bays be occupied. Please refer to the modified layouts attached as
Appendices.

Demonstrate that the Bicycle parking spaces comply with AUSTROADS Guide to Traffic
Engineering Practice, Part 14 — Bicycles, Section 10 and provide details of proposed
security category level to be provided.

Bicycle parking related to employees:

The security category of the Bike Store, as shown at Appendix A, will be Class 2 as
defined by the AUSTROADS guidance document i.e. it will be suitable for regular
employees. This is provided by way of bicycle rails to which both the frame and wheet
can be locked and by way of a lockable door to the Bike Store with access limited to
cyclist staff of the tenancies. The visitor accommodation will have provision for its own
bicycle storage within the Resident Store.

The bicycle rail system which will be used is the Ned Kelly system i.e. vertical bicycle
rails mounted to the side wall.

In terms of the bicycle parking provision within AUSTROADS, its guidance for restaurant
staff is 1 space per 100sq.m of public area. Of the two food and beverage frontage
tenancies, the first (adjacent to retail R8) has less than 100sq.m of public area when
kitchen size is taken into account as being 30% of the Gross Floor Area (GFA). The
second (adjacent to retail R10) has less than 200sq.m of public area. The guidance
would therefore suggest 3 bicycle parking spaces for staff.

The AUSTROADS bicycle parking provision guidance for shop staff (in this case, the
frontage retails tenancies, excluding the food and beverage tenancies) is a rate of 1
space per 300sq.m of GFA. In total, there are 10 retail tenancies with a combined total
retail GFA of 504sq.m. No single retail tenancy exceeding 78sq.m (considerably lower
than the 300sq.m per 1 space).

Therefore it can be expected that the demand for staff bicycle parking associated with
the food and beverage tenancies would lie between 2 and 10. Given the relative small
size of each tenancy and their staffing numbers, the likelihood of each concurrently
having a cyclist staff member on duty is very unlikely. It is therefore considered that the
provision should tend towards the lower value i.e. a provision of 5 spaces being
considered a suitable supply for the likely number of cyclist staff on duty concurrently.

CE005883 Seahaven Resort Design Note Response to RFI 05.02.2009