Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

08/1787 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1787

of 96

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (24.0 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Methodology

Observations
3.1 The Site
3.2 The Trees

3.2.1 Tree No4

3.2.2 Tree No 28

3.2.3. Tree No 30

3.2.4 Tree No 31

3.2.5 Tree No 32
33 Proposed Development Impacts
3.4 New and Existing Street Trees
3.5 Architectural Design Limitations

. Discussion .

_ 41 Tree Root Development

4.2 Tree Protection Methods and Roots

43 Design Concepts to Support Trees
4.3.1 Make Space for Roots
4.3.2 Watcr Management under Pavement
4.3.3. Trunk Space

Conclusions

5.1 Existing Tree Retention
5.2. ‘Design Limitations

5.3 Designing.for Trees:
Recommenditions

6.1 Existing Trees

6.2 Future Tree Plantings

References

Page

CDAD UMUMUb dW

t0
il
1
1
14
16

16
16
17

7
17

 

 

 

 

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
24.0 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_1787 - Response to Information Request [As Published].pdf · 24.0 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.