Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

08/1787 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1787

of 96

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (24.0 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

 

 

Seahaven Development Pty Ltd- 9-19 Hastings Street Noosa QLD 4567 1
i Introduction

Seahaven Development Pty Ltd requested this arboricultural assessment and
report for the site of No 9-19 Hastings Street Noosa QLD. The inspection and
this report has been conducted to assess the trees in close proximity to the site
on the Noosa beach reserve as per Sunshine Coast Regional Council's
information request, Item 7, regarding application number 2008/1787.

I conducted an inspection of the trees on the 11” and 13” of December 2008.
Scott Sobey of Ken Hicks & Associates supplicd the detail survey. Mr
Graham Nottle of Arkheficld supplied the current architectural plans. Mr Rob
Burrell of LandGraphics supplied a vegetation report and landscape plans.

The report details the site and three significant trees in close proximity to the
site and its construction impacts. Phe aim of this report is to assess the three
significant trees as per council’s information request and provide a tree
protection and management plan for all trees on the council reserve.

Methodology

Published research by Matheny and Clark (Matheny & Clark 1998), British
Standards BS: 5837-2005, including references from Harris (Harris et al 1999
& 2004) is the basis of the tree protection methods in this report. All other
literature cited is listed in the references at the end of the report.

Any pruning recommendations are donc to the Australian Standard AS 4373-
2007: Pruning Amenity Trees. A diameter tape was used for all
measurements, givirig a trunk diameter (DBH- Diameter at Breast Height
measured at 1300mm above ground level) based on the circumference
measurement. Where multiple trunks occur, the diameter measurement is
based on the trunk just above ground level (as per BS5837:2005, Table 2, page
8). Tree height was measured using a Suunto Clinometer where possible,
otherwise tree height was estimated to within a couptc of metres.

The tree numbers are the same used in the vegetation report by LandGraphics
(dated October 2008).

No Resistograph®, Picus®, full laboratory soil analysis or root assessment
was carried out during the time of inspection. All assessment was carried out
from ground level, and no climbing was conducted to fully assess canopy
structure that couldn't be scen from the ground.

 

Leaf and Limb Horticultural ConsultancyO
Prepared by Samuel Cowie 29" of January 2009

ye

 

“eee

Used in these records

About this file

File size
24.0 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_1787 - Response to Information Request [As Published].pdf · 24.0 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.