Council archive · source document
08/1787 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1787
Very large file (24.0 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
Seahaven Development Pty Ltd- 9-19 Hastings Street Noosa QLD 4567 1 i Introduction Seahaven Development Pty Ltd requested this arboricultural assessment and report for the site of No 9-19 Hastings Street Noosa QLD. The inspection and this report has been conducted to assess the trees in close proximity to the site on the Noosa beach reserve as per Sunshine Coast Regional Council's information request, Item 7, regarding application number 2008/1787. I conducted an inspection of the trees on the 11” and 13” of December 2008. Scott Sobey of Ken Hicks & Associates supplicd the detail survey. Mr Graham Nottle of Arkheficld supplied the current architectural plans. Mr Rob Burrell of LandGraphics supplied a vegetation report and landscape plans. The report details the site and three significant trees in close proximity to the site and its construction impacts. Phe aim of this report is to assess the three significant trees as per council’s information request and provide a tree protection and management plan for all trees on the council reserve. Methodology Published research by Matheny and Clark (Matheny & Clark 1998), British Standards BS: 5837-2005, including references from Harris (Harris et al 1999 & 2004) is the basis of the tree protection methods in this report. All other literature cited is listed in the references at the end of the report. Any pruning recommendations are donc to the Australian Standard AS 4373- 2007: Pruning Amenity Trees. A diameter tape was used for all measurements, givirig a trunk diameter (DBH- Diameter at Breast Height measured at 1300mm above ground level) based on the circumference measurement. Where multiple trunks occur, the diameter measurement is based on the trunk just above ground level (as per BS5837:2005, Table 2, page 8). Tree height was measured using a Suunto Clinometer where possible, otherwise tree height was estimated to within a couptc of metres. The tree numbers are the same used in the vegetation report by LandGraphics (dated October 2008). No Resistograph®, Picus®, full laboratory soil analysis or root assessment was carried out during the time of inspection. All assessment was carried out from ground level, and no climbing was conducted to fully assess canopy structure that couldn't be scen from the ground. Leaf and Limb Horticultural ConsultancyO Prepared by Samuel Cowie 29" of January 2009 ye “eee
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/1787 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
0019DFEA.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
About this file
- File size
- 24.0 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.