Council archive · source document
2026 LGAQ CONFERENCE MOTIONS & COUNCILLOR ATTENDANCE (Referred from the General Committee Meeting dated 7 July 2026 - Item 7.7) · Attachment 4 - Recognising and Protecting Soil as Natural Critical Infrastructure
ATTACHMENT 4 2026 LGAQ Annual Conference –
Proposed Motion
Who is the key contact for Cr Karen Finzel
this motion?
(required)
Submitting council Noosa Council
(required)
Supporting ROC
(if applicable)
Council resolution # NA
(required)
Date of council resolution TBA
(required)
Does this motion have state-wide relevance?
Was this motion suggested by a third party? No
Title of motion (required) Recognising and Protecting Soil as Natural Critical Infrastructure
Motion That the LGAQ call on the State Government to develop a
(required) comprehensive Queensland Soil Health Plan to operationalise the
National Soil Strategy at the state level and recognise soil as a “key
national asset” and critical infrastructure essential for water
security, agriculture productivity, healthy waterways, flood
attenuation climate resilience and functioning ecosystems.
What is the desired
Call on the State Government to
outcome sought?
(required) 200-word limit • support and advocate for a Queensland Soil Health Plan that
operationalises the National Soil Strategy and Action Plan into
Queensland’s specific local and infrastructure planning
frameworks, recognising the critical role that soil health plays in
water security, food production, flood attenuation and
infrastructure resilience.
• support and advocate for local government initiatives in local,
nature-based soil remediation to improve soil health and reduce
reliance on synthetic fertilisers and mitigate the financial risks of
supply chain disruptions.
• officially integrate soil remediation into the state's circular
economy frameworks, incentivising the use of locally generated
organics (such as council compost) to replace volatile synthetic
fertilisers.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
2
• prioritise renewed efforts to support landholders (farmers and
other) to gain access to objective science backed and property-
scale information that informs locally relevant nature-based soil
remediation and improvement measures that combat soil health
threats and waterway contamination.
• Advocate to compliment State soils data with a comprehensive
soil health map with harmonised soil datasets at a catchment
level as well as a more centralised and accessible program that
landholders can access for information, advice and support to
improve soil health without cost is required.
Background
Soil Science Australia estimates soils deliver A$930bn value to our
(required) 350-word limit
economy, making soil Australia’s most valuable natural asset. Yet
the latest national State of the Environment report confirms that
Australian soils are degraded and under increasing threat from
erosion, acidification, salinisation, codification, soil carbon loss,
contamination, degradation and urban and industrial expansion.
According to one study, Australia has the world’s third highest loss
of soil carbon over the last 250 years.
The global goals adopted in 2015 as part of the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development, are designed to end poverty, protect the
planet and ensure peace and prosperity for all. Healthy soils
underpin our collective ability to achieve the sustainable
development goals, as acknowledged by Australia’s 20-year
National Soil Strategy. But while the Strategy aims to recognise soil
as a vital asset, Queensland currently lacks a cohesive state-level
strategy to operationalise this, particularly for local governments.
While all states and territories have supported the National Soil
Action Plan (2023-2028), implementation remains heavily siloed in
agricultural grants and high-level mapping. To fully realise the
National Strategy’s goal of treating soil as a "key national asset,"
Queensland must operationalise this at the local and regional level.
Identifying soil as critical infrastructure would change the paradigm
from "protecting the environment" to "maintaining a municipal
asset" that actively provides measurable services like flood
attenuation for the stormwater network and structural stability for
roads. This supports local governments and farmers as the entities
that actually bear the financial brunt when this "invisible
infrastructure" fails.
The remediation of degraded soils should be a key priority for
critical infrastructure resilience. Opportunities exist to prioritise
local, nature-based solutions such as bioremediation and
phytoremediation, and to enhance soils through municipal organic
waste treatment such as composting and biochar. By investing in
local solutions, councils can build a resilient, circular economy that
improves soil health while improving resilience to global supply
chain disruptions and price volatility in petroleum-based fertilisers
and agricultural chemicals.
June 26
Wilson Crawley
Page 3
3
Case study/ Example
In the UK, a white paper published by Sustainable Soils Alliance
(optional) 350-word limit
(“A New Vision for Water”) notes that an identification of “soil as
infrastructure frames it as actively part of the delivery of regulated
services such as water quality protection, flow management and
resilience.” The paper notes that viewing soil as critical
infrastructure aids in the development of regulation, and outcomes
for healthy catchments, productive agriculture and supports
legislation, regulation and enforcement.
However, the effectiveness of this approach relies on its translation
to the property scale, where landholders make day-to-day
management decisions. The reduction of state agency-based soil
extension officers over the past two decades has created a
disconnect between policy ambition and on-ground implementation,
leaving many landholders without access to trusted, independent
advice. This gap underscores the need for a centralised, accessible
extension model that supports landholders to understand soil as
infrastructure in practice.
For example, the Keeping it in Kin Kin program, delivered by Noosa
and District Landcare, in partnership with Healthy Land and Water
and with support from Noosa Council and other stakeholders, was
established to address significant soil erosion in the Kin Kin
catchment—identified as a major contributor of sediment and
nutrient loads impacting the Noosa River system. The program
provides targeted extension support to landholders through
property visits, workshops and field days, alongside financial and
technical assistance to implement on-ground works. These include
rotational grazing, riparian revegetation, stock exclusion from
waterways, and gully and hillslope stabilisation, all aimed at
improving soil structure, reducing erosion, and enhancing water
retention.
Since 2019, the program has engaged more than 400 participants
and delivered projects across dozens of properties, resulting in
kilometres of riparian restoration, tens of thousands of trees
planted, and measurable improvements in land condition and
waterway health. By combining science-based guidance with
practical, place-based support, the initiative demonstrates how
extension services act as the critical interface between catchment-
scale objectives and individual land management, enabling soil to
function effectively as infrastructure that underpins agricultural
productivity, water quality, and ecosystem resilience.
June 26
Wilson Crawley
Used in these records
2026 LGAQ CONFERENCE MOTIONS & COUNCILLOR ATTENDANCE (Referred from the General Committee Meeting dated 7 July 2026 - Item 7.7) · Attachment 4 - Recognising and Protecting Soil as Natural Critical InfrastructureAttachmentsMeeting 964 · read item & discussion ↗
2026 LGAQ CONFERENCE MOTIONS & COUNCILLOR ATTENDANCE · Attachment 4 - Recognising and Protecting Soil as Natural Critical InfrastructureAttachmentsMeeting 953 · read item & discussion ↗
About this file
- File size
- 219 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.