MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Adam De Ville

Page 2

,.




     Notice of Submission under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009

     MCU 14/0087

     Material Change of Use - Retail Business Type 2 - Shop

     13 Noosa Drive, Noosa Heads 4567



     The following      submission details the matters of concerns with the above application                           and
     material submitted,




     Poorly made application

     The application,      planning    report and' submitted        plans were of poor quality which made
     understanding how the businessMlOuld operate near impossible.

     IDAS form S details the use as a Moveable Trailer yet fails to provide information                       of Hours of
     operation    or employee         numbers.     Without    this information       it makes it problematic              in
     consideration     of impacts of the ~evelopment          and in particular the provision of suitable, safe
     and to aust standard carparking and access for existing and new customers to the site.

     f General explanation ol the        Planning .clleme           No. or dwelling unilS   Days on<!         No. of
       ptoposed use                      defini~on ~nclude e.ell    (if applicable) or      hours of          employees
                                         definition in • new tOW)   gross flGOrarea QI      operation         Cd oppkeabla)
                                         (nOll.moodalOl)')          appficable)             (if applicable)
     i ~t
     r" 0




     Some of the submitted plans are numbered to make ease of reading and the legibility is poor.
     Plans make reference to "paces" and are in a context that cannot be interpreted .



                                            •

Page 3

                                                                                                                                   "




  4.     Confirm that the follo'vin9   mandalory    supporting   information     ""companies   this

  Mandatory supporting      Information                                                Conflrmadon    of     Methodel
                                                                                       lodgement             lodgement

  All applications
  A site plan drawn to an appl>priale scale (1:100.1:200     or 1:500 ore              9-c<Jnftnoed
  recommended :scales) wlllcll showS lno following:

  • tile location and site Bfea of the land to wlllcll the eppflCBtion relates
    !feIevant Ian<!)
  •    toe no~o polOl
  • lhe boundaries of the relevanl land
  • lhe
    Bnr road lrontages of the relevant land, Inciuding the name oflhe mad
        locallon and use of anv existing or proposed buildings or struetures
  •
       on the relevant land (note: wllere extensive demolJUon or new building.
       are propo5Gd. two sepaoate plan. Ian exlSIIng site plan and proposed site
       plen) may be appropriate)
  •    ,ny e,.;stlng or proposed easemonts on 1Il0 relevanlland and their
       lunctlon
  •    the location end use of builditlgs on land adjoining the •.•levanlland
  •    all vehlde acces. points and any existing Or proposed ClI' poall<ingateas
       on the •.•Ievant land, Car pamng spoac:osfor person. with dlsabil~ies ond
       any seNloe vehicle acress and parking should be cllOBl1ymmed
  •    lor any new building on lhe relevanlland.lIloloc:atlon   01 reruse storage
  •    lne location of any proposed retairing walls on the relevant I,nd and tnel,
       height           '
  •    Ihe looatloo of any proposed landscap;ng 00 the rel~vantland         .
  •    U181ocatloo of any Slonnwater detention on the relevant land .



The Mandatory           supporting        information      is lacking in its requirements             in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.

The applicant           confirmed      that    information         provided        de,monstrated           the onsite    parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered)                                merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.

 When the application     involves new opemtJonal work

 Plans sl10wlnQ tM nature, le<:alion. ""mber 01new on-site Cllr par1<iogbays,         , I2TConfirmed
 propo ••• d area of new landscaping, proposed type 01 new Il6hlcie cross-over
 (n",,"reSidentlal uses), proposed maxlmum new vehlwlar •• ",Icing
                                                                                       o   Not appllca~e

 arrangement (oon-resldentlal uses) of the proposed new operational ..or\;"


The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted                                   to meet this mandatory
requirement          but those provided do not achieve this requirement.

Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.

Size and Scale of development
The submitted           plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 305m in length and
require to be removed from the tfailer to provide to customers. This wili in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint                            proposed of 3.6m x 204m to approx.
7.5m    x 5o4m (40m2).        This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.

Page 4

The location of the trailer and the length of boards being removed will also create serious
safety concerns regarding the existing access to the Hire Car business that operates and any
new customers travelling onto the site through the existing heavily congested and conflicted
access point. Boards and customers will be required to stand into the driveway for the site
potentially   forcing pedestrians onto the road way as vehicles are blocked from entering the
site, in turn creating a serious safety concern where in the past 12 months one serious
accident involving a car and pedestrians oc~urred.

One plan labelled Sheet 1 of 3 has the proposed trailer located on the boundary with no front
setback, another plan sows a 2m setback. Again due to the poor quality of material submitted
it is hard to make an assumption of what is being requested.



Compliance with Relevant Codes

With the submitted     planning material supporting       plans it is difficult to how the application
intends to meet the requirements       of the following   relevant Codes, their overall and specific
outcomes.

Business Use Code

  Car Parking
  09 Sufficient carpar1<ingis available to                59.1 Off street carparking is provided at a
  accommodate the number and type of vehicles             rate of 1 space per 20m' of gross ficor area;
  likelv to be nenel'3ted b'Jthe uses on the site

The applicant within the supporting      material has underestimated       the total use area of the
                2
operation.    9m is not realistic and in a true sense the activity will require 40m2• As such
carparking need to be provided for 2 vehicle spaces, the included plans and description do
not detail how arid where this will occur to the relevant standard.

Driveway and Carparking Code

 14.111.2 The overall outcomes sQoght for the Dri.'eways and Carparking Code are the following-

 a)   Safe and reasonable access to and from vehicle accommodation and standing areas within a
      property and from the public road is provided;

 b)   The safely of pedestrians and cyclists is protected;

 d)   Carparking spaces and the associated manoeuvring areas provided are designed to be safe
      and functional and meet the reasonable requirements of the particular land use;

 e)   Adequate provision is made for the standing, parting, loading and unloading, access and
      manoeuvring of service vehicles within the development site;


The application fails to demonstrate with material provided how compliance can be achieved
to meet these outcomes. The site presently has a vehicle hire business established which
utilised an unformed gravel carpark for both maintenance and washing of hire vehicles and
their storage and promotion.    Additionally   on site, motor scooters and bicycles are hired and
displayed taking up further land within the sites boundaries .




                                   •

Page 5

The present access to the site is unsafe for both vehicles and pedestrians and there is not
being proposed within plans a car parking layout to meet standards for customers or delivery
vehicles. Vehicles accessing the site have the potentjal to block the pedestrian flow along
Noosa Drive in turn forcing pedestrians onto the busy road.

  Table 14-49 -   Driveways

                       column 1
                    Specific Outcomes
  14.113 General
  01     Vehicular access does not adversely impact on
  safety, capacity and operations of the existing or
  planned road network, the proposed driveway.
  cycleways or pedestrian pathway systems.


Allowing an additional    use to occur on site that may require deliveries, and customers to
collect hire equipment   will only increase the possibility of safety being compromised   on an
access arrangement which is at present dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists. The applicant
has not demonstrated     compliance.




                                                              •

Page 6

    Table 14-50 -    Carparking   and manoeuvring

                          column 1
                     Specific Outcomes
    14.114 Carpark design and layout
    07     Sufficient carparking is provided to
    accommodate ttle number and type of vehicles likely
    to be generated by the development having regard
    to the specifics of the use including-
    a)    the type and intensity of land use;
    b)    any existing parking av~i1able on the site;
    c}    hours of operation;
    d}    likely numbers of users;
    e)    the peak parking demand periods of uses on
          the site; and
    fl    the avanabilitv of alternative cam.'rkin/'l.
    08      The layout of ttle development provides
    adequate. clearly defined and easily accessible-
    a)    on-site vehicle parking and manoeuvring
          areas; and
    b)    loading and manoeu';ring areas for delivery
          and service ';eh icles




    09    Parking areas are located where they will not
   unduly conflict with pedestrians and '.\lill not
   dominate ttle sD-eetsc.ane.
   010 Provision is made for aieasonable number of
   on site carparking spaces identified and reserved for
   people with disabilities.

   011 Access and egress points do not impact on the
   safety and operations of the road system.




The submitted    plans do not detail how the Specific Outcomes 507, 508, 5010 of the
Carparking   Code will be achieved. This again reflects the poorly     made application,   no
consideration   of the existing use on site and limited    understanding   of the Noosa Plan
requirements.   The applicant has not demonstrated   compliance .




                                  •

Page 7

                                                                                                     •




Summary
I do not support the application lodged and advertised as detailed in this submission. I believe
the applicant has failed to demonstrate     compliance with the relevant Use Codes with the
Noosa Plan and as such the application be refused.

The application is,



    •   Poorly made application with inadequate plans to demonstrate true operational size
    •   Has a size and scale of operation greater than the those submitted on plan
    •   Location is proposed in one set of plans within front boundary setback
    •   Vehicle access is unsafe and additional       traffic   create extreme   safety issues for
        pedestrians
    •   Insufficient space on site to provide carparking for customers at present up to 5 hire
        vehicles and 4 staff vehicles parked at anyone time
    •   No carparking design submitted to meet aust standards
    •   No vehicle turnaround    capacity so vehicles leave site in forward direction
    •   Existing carparking surface a non-pervious material making provision and compliance
        with disability access codes not possible
    •   Insufficient   space on site for operation   with existing Hire Car use and associated
        workshop, detailing and vehicle storage requirements .

                                                                 •