Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Adam De Ville
"
4. Confirm that the follo'vin9 mandalory supporting information ""companies this
Mandatory supporting Information Conflrmadon of Methodel
lodgement lodgement
All applications
A site plan drawn to an appl>priale scale (1:100.1:200 or 1:500 ore 9-c<Jnftnoed
recommended :scales) wlllcll showS lno following:
• tile location and site Bfea of the land to wlllcll the eppflCBtion relates
!feIevant Ian<!)
• toe no~o polOl
• lhe boundaries of the relevanl land
• lhe
Bnr road lrontages of the relevant land, Inciuding the name oflhe mad
locallon and use of anv existing or proposed buildings or struetures
•
on the relevant land (note: wllere extensive demolJUon or new building.
are propo5Gd. two sepaoate plan. Ian exlSIIng site plan and proposed site
plen) may be appropriate)
• ,ny e,.;stlng or proposed easemonts on 1Il0 relevanlland and their
lunctlon
• the location end use of builditlgs on land adjoining the •.•levanlland
• all vehlde acces. points and any existing Or proposed ClI' poall<ingateas
on the •.•Ievant land, Car pamng spoac:osfor person. with dlsabil~ies ond
any seNloe vehicle acress and parking should be cllOBl1ymmed
• lor any new building on lhe relevanlland.lIloloc:atlon 01 reruse storage
• lne location of any proposed retairing walls on the relevant I,nd and tnel,
height '
• Ihe looatloo of any proposed landscap;ng 00 the rel~vantland .
• U181ocatloo of any Slonnwater detention on the relevant land .
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking in its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided de,monstrated the onsite parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
When the application involves new opemtJonal work
Plans sl10wlnQ tM nature, le<:alion. ""mber 01new on-site Cllr par1<iogbays, , I2TConfirmed
propo ••• d area of new landscaping, proposed type 01 new Il6hlcie cross-over
(n",,"reSidentlal uses), proposed maxlmum new vehlwlar •• ",Icing
o Not appllca~e
arrangement (oon-resldentlal uses) of the proposed new operational ..or\;"
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
requirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 305m in length and
require to be removed from the tfailer to provide to customers. This wili in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint proposed of 3.6m x 204m to approx.
7.5m x 5o4m (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Adam De VilleRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.