LUNN Council Ref 132007_2446_05 · 132007.2446.05

4, Local Infrastructure and Public Transport Limitations

The proposed development does not consider the limited availability of alternative transport options in the area.
While the development may rely on public transport and a private shuttle, the local infrastructure is already stretched,
with limited bus routes and no nearby train stations. Therefore, many visitors will be reliant on private vehicles,
further increasing parking demand.

5. Precedent for Future Developments

Approving this development without addressing parking concerns could set a negative precedent for future
developments in the area. The cumulative effect of inadequate parking in multiple developments could lead to a
significant deterioration in the quality of life for existing residents, as well as strain the local road network.

Furthermore, our concerns regarding the additional beds/visitor numbers relates to potential noise increases
throughout the property and surrounds. In view of the application the 11 beds are bunk beds which is potentially an
additional 22 people. In viewing the plans, the drawing displays 8 bunk beds across 3 rooms which would be 24
people. Whether it is 22 or 24, this increase in the number of visitors impacts noise and the surrounds.

1. Increased Noise Levels from High Occupancy and Activity in Communal Spaces

The proposed development appears to increase the number of visitors whilst retaining the existing sized communal
and kitchen spaces, which could result in a significant increase in noise levels in those areas. The noise generated by
conversations, movement of people, and the general activity of a larger number of residents in these areas would
impact the surrounding residential homes. This is of particular concern during late evening or early morning hours
when noise disturbances are likely to have a more significant impact on residents’ well-being. Especially the kitchen
area as the increased visitor numbers all trying the use the facilities at similar times would draw out the noise over a
longer period. My concern is the initial size of the communal areas does not accommodate the additional visitors and
could lead to a condensed number of guests in a relatively small space, further exacerbating the noise in those areas.

2. Insufficient Mitigation Measures
The planning application does not appear to sufficiently address how the potential increase in noise and kitchen-
-related disturbances will be mitigated.

NS
Conclusion
Given the signifi icant concerns about the lack of sufficient parking in the proposed development, we urge the planning
authority to reconsider the approval of this development in its current form. We request that the developers either
increase the number of parking spaces or explore alternative solutions, such as improved access to public transport,
more frequent shuttles or better integration with existing parking infrastructure. Furthermore, we believe that
without addressing these noise and disturbance issues the development could negatively impact the surrounding area
and residents’ enjoyment of their homes. We respectfully request that additional measures be considered to reduce
the potential for noise and kitchen-related disturbances, including soundproofing and limiting kitchen operating
hours.

We appreciate your consideration of these concerns and look forward to hearing your response.

Yours faithfully,

Dylan and Danielle Lunn
¢ ae 2/24 6/12/14

Dyl: n Linn Danielle Lunn