Council archive · source document
Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU22 0171 [As Published] · MCU22/0171
proposed basement does not comply with the natural ground level as defined in the scheme, it will
be below the required fill level and result in a basement below a lawfully changed ground level.
The proposed basement is well integrated into the building, does not present as a storey, will not
be visible to the street or surrounding area due to required filling and does not dominate the street
or the building. The basement is considered to meet the Performance outcome.
AO2.2 of he Landscaping Code states that basement car parks do not extend beyond the above
ground footprint to allow for deep and soft planting within building setback areas in AO2.2.
The difference between compliant setbacks and non compliance is 0.5 metres on the western
boundary and in part 1.2 metres on the eastern boundary. Refer Figure 3. This relaxation is
supported as:
• A basement would not be possible where complying with the required setbacks.
• The alternative at grade parking/garages which would dominate the frontage of the site.
• The site is narrow and the intrusions are required to achieve manoeuvring on site.
• The eastern intrusion relates to an area of basement carparking.
• Additional carparking is provided on site that is not visible to the surrounding area.
• Side boundary setbacks to the north and south of the building are able to support meaningful
landscaping that will screen the development.
The proposed landscaping complies with AO10.1 of the Dual Occupancy Code as it provides in
excess of the required 40% landscaping and 60% soft landscaping, with more than 3 metre wide
gardens in the front setback. Refer Figure 10. Robust landscaping conditions have been included
to ensure there is sufficient softening of the building.
Figure 10 -landscape open space at ground and upper level
Upper Floor
AO12.1 of the Medium Density Residential Zone code seeks:
Buildings and structures meet the following minimum boundary setbacks for side boundaries—
• 1.5 metres setback up to 4.5 metres height;
• 2 metres setback between 4.5 metres and 7.5 metres height; and
• 2.5 metres where above 7.5 metres height
It is proposed that:
• Shade sails at 1.8 in lieu of 2 metres
Page 14 of 22
Document Set ID: 22352422
Version: 7, Version Date: 14/04/2023
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU22 0171 [As Published].pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 6.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.