Original source · versioned page text
Astp_Tp_Rpt
Our ref: 240605
24 June 2024
The Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Council
PO Box 141
TEWANTIN QLD 4565
Attention: Planning and Development Assessment
Via Email: [email protected]
Dear Sir/Madam,
Re: Development Application for Materia Change of Use – Non-complying Dwelling House
146 Ferrells Road, Cooroy
Lot 13 on RP213603
This correspondence forms part of an application for a Material Change of Use to establish a Dwelling
House on land located at 146 Ferrells Road, Cooroy, which is legally described as Lot 13 on RP213603.
This application has been prepared by ADAMS + SPARKES Town Planning (hereafter; ‘ADAMS + SPARKES’)
for and on behalf of the applicant, Diana & Jeremy Edwards.
This correspondence will describe the site, the proposed development, and address any relevant state
and local government planning considerations, and design issues with respect to the proposal. This
report should be read in conjunction with the following supporting documentation:
Attachment 1 Building Design Plans prepared by Reitsma & Associates
Introduction
The local government which applies to the subject site is Noosa Council (hereafter ‘Council’). In
accordance with Schedule 8 of the Planning Regulation 2017, Noosa Council is the Assessment Manager
for the Development Application.
The applicable planning instrument is the Noosa Plan 2020 (hereafter ‘the Planning Scheme’). Under
the Planning Scheme, the proposed land use is defined as a ‘Dwelling House’, and the site is located
within the Rural Zone.
In accordance with Table 5.5.13 (Rural) of the Planning Scheme, Material Change of Use associated with
a new Dwelling House in the Rural Zone is deemed to be Accepted Development, where compliant with
the relevant requirements for Accepted Development. Given that the proposed Dwelling House cannot
satisfy all the Acceptable Outcomes of the pertinent codes, Code Assessable Material Change of Use
application is required. The proposal seeks performance solutions with regard to PO2 and PO8 of the
Rural Zone Code and PO22 of the Low Density Housing Code and is therefore subject to a Code
Assessable application.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 8 pages
Page 2
Subject Site and Surrounding Area The subject site is a regular-shaped allotment with a frontage to Ferrells Road of 20.326 metres. The site’s north boundary adjoins a rear allotment (104 Ferrells Road) with an access driveway traversing the the northern boundary. The site contains a few sporadically located trees, with the more densely vegetated parts being along the south and west boundaries of the site. As demonstrated in Figure 1 below, the site was improved by an existing Dwelling House, which has recently been demolished to accommodate the proposed new Dwelling. Figure 1 Subject Site (Source: Nearmap 2024) Proposal Overview The proposed new Dwelling, associated outbuilding (cottage) and tennis court are illustrated within the Building Design Plans prepared by Reitsma in Attachment 1. As shown in Figure 2 below, the Dwelling House is proposed to be established on the elevated (south) part of the site, in a similar position to the recently demolished dwelling house. Rock retaining has been proposed around a section of the driveway, dwelling house, shed and water tanks. The rock retaining creates additional stability for the site and proposed buildings, while ensuring the proposed earthworks and retaining reflect the site rural character. The built form generally steps down with the slope of the site, being constructed into the landform and retaining much of the existing ground level surrounding the building.
Page 3
Figure 2 Proposed Development (Reitsma & Associates 2024) The proposed development comprises a contemporary four (4) bedroom, single storey Dwelling House, providing a maximum building height under 8 metres above the current ground level and the finished surface level of the site. As depicted in Figure 3 below, the proposed development presents a high- quality architectural design with complementary landscaping surrounding the dwelling, which blends with the natural landscapes to conceal the proposed buildings. Specifically, the onsite landscapes will be considered more once the development of the house has occurred. The proposed cottage has a similar design, which has been presented on a smaller scale. The cottage comprises a two (2) bedroom dwelling with a bathroom, kitchenette and living space. The proposed Dwelling features a combination of light neutral tones, with projections of an all- surrounding verandah provided throughout the built form to aid articulation, variation, visual interest and outdoor/indoor living integration. The proposed Dwelling provides a high-quality living environment with a focus on providing excellent open space (including a pool) and indoor living areas, each encompassing a hinterland theme, which is evident in Cooroy. Furthermore, the proposed development addresses all site constraints, such as slope, in a way that will not cause any adverse impacts to surrounding properties (as detailed throughout the following report sections).
Page 4
Figure 3 Rendered Image (Source: Reitsma & Associates 2024)
A breakdown of the key development parameters is provided in Table 1 below.
Table 1 Development Particulars
Development Permitted/Required Proposed Compliance
Particulars
Main Dwelling House
Building Height 9 metres (pitched roof) and two Max. 8 metres and one (1) storey Yes
(2) storeys
Site Cover 1.19% 0.59% Yes
Gross Floor Area 500m2 350.29m2 Yes
Landscaping Minimum 20% Greater than 20% Yes
Parking Two (2) spaces Two (2) car garage Yes
Setbacks Frontage – 10m Frontage – 61m Yes
Side (north) – 10m Side (north) – greater than 10m Yes
Rear (east) – 10m Rear (east) – greater than 10m Yes
Side (south) – 10m Side (south) – 14.26m Yes
Side (west) – 10m Side (west) – greater than 10m Yes
Cut & Fill Maximum – 1.5m Max. Cut – 0.8m Yes
Max. Fill 1.1m Yes
Secondary Dwelling
Gross Floor Area 65m2 64.84m2 Yes
Bedrooms 2 bedrooms 2 Bedrooms Yes
No. of Secondary 1 Dwelling 1 Dwelling Yes
Dwellings
Page 5
Statutory Provisions
A review of the applicable State interests has been carried out with respect to the State Assessment and
Referral Agency’s (SARA) DA Mapping and the Planning Regulation 2017. A review of Schedule 10 of the
Planning Regulation 2017 confirms that the development application is required to be referred to
Energex as an advice agency. The site has an Energex easement in the northeastern corner of the
property. As such, the application requires referral to Energex as an Advice Agency.
Local Government Considerations – Noosa Plan 2020
Table 2 below, provides a breakdown of the planning scheme particulars, which relate to the subject site
and proposed development.
Table 2 Planning Scheme Particulars
Planning Instrument Noosa Plan 2020
Zone Rural Zone
Precinct N/A
- Agricultural Land Conservation Area
- Biodiversity Waterways and Wetlands (Area of Biodiversity
Significance & Riparian Buffer Area)
- Bushfire Hazard
Overlays o Medium Potential Bushfire Intensity
o Potential Impact Buffer
- Landslide Hazard
o High Hazard Area
o Moderate Hazard Area
Rural Zone Code
Codes required to be addressed Low Density Housing Code
Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay Code
Code Assessment of the Development Application is required to be carried out, due to the proposal
being unable to comply with all the Acceptable Outcomes of the Rural Zone Code and Low Density
Housing Code. As such, a comprehensive assessment against the areas of non-compliance with the
Codes is provided below.
It is noted that the proposed Dwelling House complies with majority of the Low Density Housing Code
and Rural Zone Code. In accordance with Part 5.9 (Categories of development and assessment –
Overlays) of the Planning Scheme, the only Overlay Code that is required to be assessed is the
Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay Code, due to the following:
• The Biodiversity Waterways and Wetlands Overlay Code is not required to be assessed as it is not
required to undertake any vegetation clearing onsite; and,
• The Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code and Landslide Hazard Overlay Code are not assessable for Dwelling
House development. Further, any new Dwelling will be assessed for bushfire safety and nominated a
minimum BAL for construction at Building Certification stage.
Whilst generally demonstrating compliance with the Acceptable Outcomes of the Zone Code and
Landslide Hazard Overlay Code, some minor variances are proposed, requiring additional assessment
Page 6
against the corresponding Performance Outcomes. Where the below sections are silent in relation to an
assessable element, the development is seen to comply with that relevant assessment criteria and no
further assessment is required.
Rural Zone Code
The proposed Dwelling House does not comply with the following Acceptbale Outcomes of the Zone
Code:
• Acceptbale Outcome AO2.4 – Agricultural Land Conservation Land separation
• Acceptbale Outcome AO8.4 – Setbacks
The proposed development is considered to comply with the corresponding Performance Outcomes of
the above-mentioned benchmarks, as demonstrated below.
Acceptable Outcome AO2.4 – Agricultural Land Conservation Land separation
Acceptable Outcome AO2.4 requires no sensitive land uses to be established closer than 200 metres
from land on an adjacent property included in the Rural Zone and mapped as an Agricultural Land
Conservation Area. Figure 4 below demonstrates the Agricultural Land Conservation Area overlay map
and the proposed position of the dwelling house and associated outbuildings.
Figure 4 Agricultural Land Conservation Land Overlay (Noosa Plan 2020)
As identified in Figure 4 above, the yellow circle shows a 200m radius to surrounding properties from the
approximate location of the proposed house. AO2.4 requires a 200m separation distance from land on
an adjacent property in the Rural Zone Code; as such, it can be easily determined that if the property
were to comply with this Acceptable Outcome, no section of the property would be able to establish a
dwelling house. Additionally, Noosa Council has confirmed that the Agricultural Land Conservation Land
Overlay impacting dwellings is not reasonable and as a result, this provision is proposed to be removed s
part of the currently advertised planning scheme amendment.
The proposed Dwelling House and associated outbuildings comply with PO2, as the development will not
result in a loss or the diminishing of the productive capacity of the Agricultural Land Conservation Area.
Page 7
The subject site until recently accommodated a dwelling house in the same location of the proposed new dwelling. As such, the proposed dwelling house and associated outbuildings will not create further impacts on the Agricultural Land Conservation Area. Acceptable Outcome AO8.4 (b) & AO8.5 - Reduced setback to riparian buffer area and Agricultural Land Conservation Area Acceptable Outcome AO8.4 requires buildings and structures to be setback a distance greater than the width of the riparian buffer area, as shown in Figure 5 below. It is proposed to provide reduced setbacks to the riparian buffer area due to the large width of the buffer area, creating an onerous setback expectation. The dwelling and associated outbuildings are appropriately located, in the same position as the recently demolish dwelling and in an elevated, cleared section of the property. Furthermore, Acceptable Outcome AO8.5 requires properties over 2 hectares in area to be setback no less than 200 metres between sensitive land uses and land on an adjacent rural zone property over 4 hectares in the Agricultural Land Conservation Area. The reduced setbacks are largely based on the need to position the Dwelling and Secondary Dwelling on the flattest sections of the site, where the area is cleared and unconstrained . As shown in Figures 4 & 5, complying with the two setbacks would significantly and unnecessarily constrain the property and its ability to accommodate a new dwelling house. As the site is within the Rural Zone, a Dwelling House is a consistent land use and should be able to be accommodated on the property, subject to reasonable and relevant conditions. Figure 5 Riparian Buffer Area (Noosa Plan 2020) The property still provides significant vegetation buffering. Attachment 1 identifies the relevant overlays, setbacks and proposed buildings. The proposed development complies with the Performance Outcome PO8 for the following reasons:
Page 8
• The dwelling house and associated outbuildings are appropriately sited to avoid environmental
harm or nuisance to other sensitive land uses. The proposed development is for a low-density
dwelling house design that will not cause adverse impacts on amenity values;
• No proposed buildings are within the Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay;
• The proposed development does not involve the use of chemicals or air pollutants; and,
• The proposed development is a consistent rural use (dwelling houses) in the rural zone. There
are no conflicts to activities or rural uses on adjoining properties.
Overall, the proposed Dwelling House complies with the PO8 of the Rural Code and should be supported
on the above-mentioned basis.
Low Density Housing Code
The proposed Dwelling House does not comply with the following Acceptbale Outcomes of the Low
Density Housing Code:
• Acceptbale Outcome AO22.1-2 – Landslide Hazard Area
The proposed development is considered to comply with the corresponding Performance Outcomes of
the above-mentioned benchmarks, as demonstrated below.
Acceptable Outcome AO22.1-2 – Landslide Hazard Area
Given that the site is mapped as being subject to Landslide Hazard, the proposed development does not
comply with Acceptable Outcomes AO22.1 and AO22.2. Both Acceptable Outcomes require no
development (including access) to be located in the moderate, high or very high landslide hazard areas.
Figure 6 below demonstrates that the access and proposed dwelling are located within the moderate
hazard area.
Figure 6 Landslide Hazard Overlay (Noosa Plan 2020)
Page 9
A Landslide Risk Assessment has not been provided as the proposed access and new dwelling house are
located where the previous access and dwelling house were positioned. The dwelling on site has only
recently been demolished for the construction of the new proposed dwelling house. The impacts of the
moderate landslide hazard area are minimal and will not adversely impact the ability to establish the
proposed new dwelling.
The proposed development complies with PO22 of the Low Density Housing Code as the development
will still maintain the safety of people and property. Furthermore, the proposed development does not
have hazardous materials stored in bulk. As such, the property is predicted to have minimal concerns
around landslides and complies with Performance Outcome PO22 of the code.
Conclusion
This planning report has been prepared on behalf of Diana & Jeremy Edwards and demonstrates that
approval of the proposed Dwelling House and associated outbuildings at 146 Ferrells Road, Cooroy, is
warranted, subject to reasonable and relevant conditions on the following basis:
• The proposed Dwelling House design complies with the Low Density Housing Code;
• The proposed Dwelling House is not an overdevelopment of the site, given that the building
design provides complying site coverage, building height and front and side boundary setback
outcomes;
• The development generally complies with the relevant Assessment Benchmarks provided within
the Rural Zone Code, with any departures from the Acceptable Outcomes of the Code suitably
justified against the corresponding Performance Outcomes;
• The proposed Dwelling House has been designed to ensure the privacy and amenity of future
residents of the Dwelling, as well as for the residents of the adjoining properties;
• The retention of the existing vegetation onsite ensures that the proposed reduced setbacks to
the building will be adversely impact the riparian buffer area; and,
• The building design comprises a slope design to avoid the need to create large retaining walls
on the site and minimise earthworks on the sloping site to the greatest extent possible.
On the basis of the assessment contained within this report, it is requested that Council favourably
consider the development proposal subject to reasonable and relevant conditions.
ADAMS + SPARKES
TO WN P L ANN ING
Pete Sparkes Max Shadforth
DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNER