Council archive · source document
MCU14/0067 Town Planning Report
PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES ACCEPTABLE OUTCOMES COMMENT
AND
AO6.2 Development is located outside Not Applicable
the erosion prone area unless it is The site is not located within an erosion
redevelopment. prone area.
AND
AO6.3 Coastal-dependent Not Applicable
development: The site is not located within an erosion
(1) locates, designs and constructs prone area.
relevant buildings or structures to
withstand coastal erosion impacts,
including by use of appropriate
foundations, or
(2) installs and maintains coastal
protection works to mitigate
adverse impacts to people and
permanent structures from coastal
erosion at the location.
AND
AO6.4 Development that is temporary, Not Applicable
readily relocatable or able to be The site is not located within an erosion
abandoned, or essential community prone area.
service infrastructure:
(1) locates built structures landward of
an applicable coastal building line,
or
(2) where there is no coastal building
line, locates habitable built
structures landward of the
alignment of adjacent habitable
buildings, or locates lifesaver
towers or beach access
infrastructure to minimise its
impacts on physical coastal
processes, or
(3) where it is demonstrated that (1)
or (2) is not reasonable and (3)
does not apply:
(a) locates built structures as far
landward as practicable
(b) uses layout design to
minimise the footprint of the
development that remains
within the erosion prone
area.
AND
AO6.5 Redevelopment of existing built Not Applicable
structures not referred to in AO6.4, and The site is not located within an erosion
excluding marine development: prone area.
(1) relocates built structures outside
that part of the erosion prone area
that is within the coastal
management district, or
(2) relocates built structures as far
landward as practicable, and
landward of an applicable coastal
building line, or
(3) where there is no coastal building
line:
(a) relocates built structures
landward of the alignment of
adjacent habitable buildings,
or
(b) uses layout design to
minimise the footprint of the
development that remains
within the erosion prone
area, or
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0067 Town Planning ReportRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 895 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.