Council archive · source document
MCU14/0067 Town Planning Report
PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES ACCEPTABLE OUTCOMES COMMENT
coastal waters to the extent
practicable, unless the
development is within ports or
airports, or is marine development
(2) maintaining or enhancing the
connectivity of ecosystems in
consideration of the cumulative
effect of the development in
addition to existing developed
areas
(3) retaining coastal wetlands,
seagrass beds and other locally
important feeding, nesting or
breeding sites for native wildlife.
AND
AO7.6 Measures are incorporated as Not Applicable
part of siting and design of the The proposal is not for private marine
development to maintain or enhance development.
water quality to achieve the
environmental values and water quality
objectives outlined in the Environmental
Protection (Water) Policy 2009.
AND
AO7.7 Development avoids the Not Applicable
disturbance of acid sulphate soils, or The proposal is not for private marine
where it is demonstrated that this is not development.
possible, the disturbance of acid
sulphate soils is carefully managed to
minimise and mitigate the adverse
effects of the disturbance on coastal
resources.
PO8 Coastal protection work is AO8.1 Coastal protection work is only Not Applicable
undertaken only as a last resort where undertaken to protect existing The proposal is not for Coastal
erosion presents an imminent threat to permanent structures from imminent protection work.
public safety or permanent structures. adverse coastal erosion impacts, and
Editor’s note: Applications for coastal the structures cannot reasonably be
protection work must be supported by a relocated or abandoned.
report certified by an RPEQ that AND
demonstrates how the engineering AO8.2 Coastal protection work to Not Applicable
solution sought by the work will be protect private structures is undertaken The proposal is not for Coastal
achieved. on private land to the maximum extent protection work.
reasonable.
AND
AO8.3 Coastal protection work does not Not Applicable
increase the coastal hazard risk for The proposal is not for Coastal
adjacent areas or properties. protection work.
PO9 Development avoids adverse AO9.1 Development: Complies
impacts on matters of state (1) is set back from matters of state The proposal will not result in any
environmental significance, or where environmental significance adverse impacts on matters of state
this is not reasonably possible, impacts (2) avoids interrupting, interfering or environmental significance.
are minimised and an environmental otherwise adversely impacting
offset is provided for any significant underlying natural ecosystem
residual impacts to matters of state components or processes and
environmental significance that are interactions that affect or maintain
prescribed environmental matters. the matters of state environmental
significance, such as water quality,
hydrology, geomorphology and
biological processes, or
(3) incorporates measures as part of
its location and design to protect
and retain matters of state
environmental significance and
underlying ecosystem processes
within and adjacent to the
development site to the greatest
extent practicable.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0067 Town Planning ReportRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 895 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.