Council archive · source document
19093_Council_Minor Change Application_150419 · 51993.594.01
Attached to the e-mail Change to DA (Extensions to unit 6) TPC2534 - 51993.594.01.
Monday, 15 April 2019
Our Ref: 19093 / Office: Sunshine Coast
NOOSA COUNCIL
PO BOX 141
TEWANTIN QLD 4565
ATTENTION: Development Assessment
Dear Sir/Madam
MINOR CHANGE APPLICATION
TOWN PLANNING CONSENT PERMIT 2534
26 SUNSEEKER CLOSE, NOOSAVILLE
LOT 6 & COMMON PROPERTY ON BUP104383
In relation to the abovementioned Development Approval originally granted by Noosa Council on 21
July 1993, on behalf of the owner of Lot 6, we hereby make a change application pursuant to Section
78 of the Planning Act 2016.
Please find enclosed the following documentation to facilitate Council’s assessment of the request:
Form 5 – Change Application Form
Consent of the Body Corporate
Proposal Plans
Payment of the required fee will be made following receipt of Council’s invoice.
PROPOSED CHANGE
It is proposed to undertake a minor extension of Unit 6 in accordance with the attached proposal
plans. The proposed extension will replace an existing approved covered pergola (refer building
2
approval plans in Attachment A) with a 16m ground level extension of the units kitchen and living
area. The extension will not change site density and will comply with the GFA and site cover provisions
of the Noosa Plan. The only area of noncompliance is setback to the western boundary. The original
approved setback to this boundary was 1.5m to single level garages and 2.7m to the 2 storey unit. It
is noted that the approved and existing covered pergola has a zero boundary setback. On the basis of
the original approval it is reasonable to expect that a 1.5m setback to single level building components
would be achievable. The extension proposes a 0.9m setback for a wall length of 6.6m. This reduced
setback wall length will not contain any openings and will have a height of 2.6m. This boundary
adjoins unconstructed road reserve of about 6m in width that is grassed and landscaped. While
pedestrians can access this area from Gibson Road it terminates at the Noosa Waters canal does not
provide any through pedestrian movement. A separation of more than 12m will be achieved between
the proposed extension and the closest building adjoining to the west. It is considered that the
proposed reduced setback will not have any detrimental impacts on adjoining areas and uses.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 7 pages
Page 2
STATUTORY ASSESSMENT
Planning Act 2016 defines a minor change as:
A minor change, for a development approval, is a change to the approval that —
i. would not result in a substantially different development; and
The DA Rules state:
In determining whether the proposed change would result in substantially different
development, the assessment manager or referral agency must consider the individual
circumstances of the development, in the context of the change proposed.
A change may be considered to result in a substantially different development if the proposed
change:
Involves a new use; or
Comment: The proposed change does not involve a new use.
Results in the application applying to a new parcel of land; or
Comment: The proposed change does not involve any new parcels of land.
Dramatically changes the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance; or
Comment: The proposed change does not dramatically change the built form in terms of
scale, bulk and appearance
Changes the ability of the proposed development to operate as intended (for example,
reducing the size of a retail complex may reduce the capacity of the complex to service the
intended catchment); or
Comment: The proposed change does not change the ability of the proposed
development to operate as intended.
Removes a component that is integral to the operation of the development; or
Comment: The proposed change does not remove any integral components of the
development.
Significantly impacts on traffic flow and the transport network, such as increasing traffic to
the site; or
Comment: The proposed change will not significantly impact on traffic flow or the
transport network.
Introduces new impacts or increases the severity of known impacts; or
Comment: The proposed change will not introduce new impacts or increase the severity of
known impacts.
Page 3
Removes an incentive or offset component that would have balanced the negative impact
of the development; or
Comment: No development incentives or offsets are removed by the change.
Impacts on infrastructure provisions.
Comment: The proposed change will have no impact on infrastructure provision.
ii. if a development application for the development, including the change, were made
when the change application is made would not cause—
A. the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or
Comment: The proposed change does not include any prohibited development.
B. referral to a referral agency, other than to the chief executive, if there were
no referral agencies for the development application; or
Comment: No referral to a referral agency would be required.
C. referral to extra referral agencies, other than to the chief executive; or
Comment: No referral to a referral agency would be required.
D. a referral agency to assess the application against, or have regard to, matters
prescribed by regulation under section 55(2), other than matters the referral
agency must have assessed the application against, or have had regard to,
when the application was made; or
Comment: No additional referral agency assessment criteria is triggered.
E. public notification if public notification was not required for the
development application.
Comment: The original application required public notification.
Accordingly, the subject change is a minor change.
CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT
Pursuant to Clause 81(3) the responsible entity -
(a) must assess against, or have regard to, the matters that applied when the development
application was made; and
Comment: The proposed change is a minor increase in development area and remains
generally consistent with the original approval and the criteria that applied when the
development application was made.
Page 4
(b) may assess against, or have regard to, the matters that applied when the change
application was made.
Comment: The proposed change is a minor increase in development area and is generally
consistent with the provisions of the current Noosa Plan, with the exception of the western
boundary setback as detailed above.
CONCLUSION
The proposed change does not compromise the intent of the original approval and generally complies
with the provisions of the current Noosa Plan. Approval of the minor change is warranted.
Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me direct.
Yours faithfully,
PROJECT URBAN
Scott Sobey
DIRECTOR
Email: [email protected]
Page 5
ATTACHMENT A Pergola building approval [OCR of page images] ATTACHMENT A Pergola building approval
Page 6
LOT 6
RP 865310
PARISH OF WEYBA
COUNTY OF MARSH
ENT SITE AREA : 2160 m'
BtP :104 363
Q-CERT PTY LTD
3tJILDING WORKS APPROVAL
No:_1033 11AUG7011
91'20'00" rsuant to
83'46'4 2/ THE SU.i-m^NABLE PLANNING ACT 2009
9p 53'20„ THE BUILDING AC? C_> 1975 as ammended
SCOT CDLrMAN BSA A1060878
Subjsc; ;C o4"tl t GAs a! the decision notice
PQopo O : ^cALE'• I 1JPT :
N .r 1
Len Dcaddot 6 /a6 sv>'s ea -Ctom (A 00-.0, 000ref 'S
Page 7
Q55-0
•LoLc£iP^04^3'3
COLORBOND CUSTOM
ROOF SHEETING FIXED
WITH MANUFACTURERS
SCISSOR TRUSSES
Ml r - i
FULLY CORE FILLED 190
SERIES CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS
1G'Tm P,.ASI[FBOARD FINE RENDER SELECTED MEMBRANE
LIVING
Q-CERT PTY LTD
RKS APPROVAL
' -1033 11AUG7011
Not is
SHE S..'4 ,A iNA5L€ ALANNING ACT 2009
HE BU''-:.ha AC'" OLD 1978 as ar-ended
6r7^oUNB
TERMITE TREATMENT TO LOCAL
AUTHORITY REQUIREMENTS
BUII(-DEa= PaoPa"ED Sca le Dwy No
a6 n611 L SCalle l ^0
Coolaolq Bw1d^^9 P o\a SO /ob
pQwN
E^
beoAr ' 1155 S`bib
L ^^
en
6 /^^ ^ seel^e^ C , Nom' L40. iia^ r. ^3TS : T R s a . ^wnv woa^
Page 8
"W11 ,1111111 11 1
II
Iljli X114 ,I' ^I II ^i,i^I^I^I 'iIl•I,
9300
;{
t utl ^^ti 1
It nI K
0
11
WEST ELEVATION FooTINcvs' NORTH ELEVATION
boo x 400x400
WA QO
' Nora Coi. us`n6LE MAI-c2tA L
Provides I Y, Crops oC h. T.
s-raA' e(ZPf c Tb a fit;fe5
a Lo{- G 8^' 1o438'S
0d
Q-CERT PTY LTD
BUILDING WORKS APPR'
reisuant to
THE SU$ ,A ',,ABLE PLANNING ACT 200::
THE BUILDING AC T OL D ' Q78 as ammena
1
SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SCC" OC 'A,N BSA 4' 060878
J V .. ^rl
Subject tc c•c t c•s 54; s s- --*-ce
8uJUDEQ: Peopd,^D : 5 DATE: D'J (A NO.
Coo► oola &.k1din9 ComRn1 PQY a loo - aco /o 0?C:. o(D. %I ?
C A -1 T- DaA*w0 6M M.
MA : LISS88b 4,/L.
Len i)C.AC c ro/2(. -nsetceg Cloy.A oma wct s
Used in these records
19093_Council_Minor Change Application_150419.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.1 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.