Original source · versioned page text
Appendix B - Code Compliance Tables
Attached to the e-mail Resort Drive, Noosa heads - Access Easement @ CTS Reconfiguration of a Lot - REC17/0022.
APPENDIX B – CODE COMPLIANCE TABLES [OCR of page images] == AUTO URBANCONSULTANTS APPENDIX B — CODE COMPLIANCE TABLES
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 20 pages
Page 2
NOOSA HEADS LOCALITY CODE
Note: Only the relevant Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions of this code have been addressed below.
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Effects of use
No solution provided Complies –The proposed reconfiguration has been designed to
directly correlate with approved multiple dwelling developments.
These developments have been designed to avoid any significant
impacts on light, air quality, noise, accessibility, or other conditions
enjoyed by users of adjoining and nearby residential development.
No solution provided Complies – The proposed reconfiguration has been designed to
directly correlate with approved multiple dwellings development
over the subject land, which have been designed to retain (as far as
practicable) views to the Noosa National Park adjoining the site to
the east and south.
Built form
Page 1 of 20
Page 3
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
No solution provided Complies – The proposed reconfiguration has been designed to
directly correlate with approved multiple dwelling developments
over the subject land which achieve an overall density of
development of no more than 100 persons per hectare.
Not applicable – the proposal is for a reconfiguration of a lot only.
However, it has been designed to directly correlate to an approved
multiple dwelling developments over the subject land which has
been assessed as being of an appropriate height.
Page 2 of 20
Page 4
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Not applicable – the proposal is for a reconfiguration of a lot only.
However, it has been designed to directly correlate to an approved
multiple dwelling developments over the subject land which has
been assessed as having appropriate setbacks.
No solution provided Not applicable – the proposal is for a reconfiguration of a lot only.
However, it has been designed to directly correlate to an approved
multiple dwelling developments over the subject land which has
been assessed as being of an appropriate density.
No solution provided
No solution provided
Page 3 of 20
Page 5
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Not applicable – the proposal is for a reconfiguration of a lot only.
However, it has been designed to directly correlate to an approved
multiple dwelling developments over the subject land which has
been assessed as being of an appropriate design.
Not applicable – the proposal is for a reconfiguration of a lot only.
However, it has been designed to directly correlate to approved
multiple dwelling developments over the subject land which has
been assessed as achieving appropriate flood immunity and drainage
solutions.
Page 4 of 20
Page 6
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Not applicable – the proposal is for a reconfiguration of a lot only.
However, it has been designed to directly correlate to an approved
multiple dwelling developments over the subject land which has
been determined as being responsive to matters of slope across the
site.
Environment, conservation and recreation
No solution provided Complies – the proposed reconfiguration has been designed to
directly correlate to approved multiple dwelling developments over
the subject land, which has adequately demonstrated that there are
no significant adverse effects on environmental and cultural heritage
values.
No solution provided Complies – The proposal will not have any adverse impacts on the
adjoining national park.
Page 5 of 20
Page 7
RECONFIGURING A LOT CODE
Note: Only the relevant Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions of this code have been addressed below.
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Lot Sizes and Dimensions
Complies – The proposed reconfiguration is for a layered community
title scheme, which has been designed to directly correlate with
approved multiple dwelling developments over the subject land.
Page 6 of 20
Page 8
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Lot Layout
Alternative Solution – proposed lots are intended to be access by a
combination of access easement, direct road frontage and / or
common property.
Not Applicable – rear lots are not proposed.
Alternative Solution – the subject land has been designated for
residential purposes by virtue of its semi-attached residential zone.
The proposed development forms a natural and ordinary extension of
the adjacent Noosa Springs development.
Complies – House site areas have been established through the
associated multiple dwelling approvals over the subject land, which
are well removed from the adjacent national park.
Complies – The proposed reconfiguration provides an outcome which
aligns with the approved multiple dwelling developments for the
subject land, and resultant lot creation is appropriate for this
outcome.
Page 7 of 20
Page 9
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Not Applicable – No new road is intended as a consequence of the
proposed reconfiguration.
Page 8 of 20
Page 10
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Page 9 of 20
[OCR of page images]
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES
h)
dD
k)
has no significant adverse effects on
habitat corndors or areas of significant
native vegetation;
does not create noise attenuation
difficulties;
incorporates pedestrian and cyclist
crossings at intersections or where
required to access high activity nodes and
public transport;
has regard to the potential for conflict
between vehicles, pedestrians and
cyclists; and
incorporates on-road cycling facilities.
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS
$7.4 Road networks provide connectivity
between residential areas, both internally and to
adjoining sites, using access roads
AND
$7.5 The length of a cul-de-sac does not
exceed 200m in urban areas and 500m in rural
areas;
AND
$7.6 The layout uses street and road design,
including variations in carriageway width, as a
traffic calming measure to encourage lower
traffic speeds. (Note: Carriageway widths are
identified in Section 2.3 of PSPS Engineering
Design Standards — Roads, Drainage and
Earthworks.)
AND
$7.7 On-road cycling treatment is utilised to
provide safe and continuous movement of
cyclists along a roadway such as--
a) sealed shoulders:
b) wide kerbside lane;
c) exclusive or peak period bicycle lane;
d) advisory treatments such as Bicycle
Awareness Zone;
e) shared parking / bicycle lane;
f) contra flow bicycle lane; or
g) — bus/bicycle lane;
AND
$7.8 The provision of bicycle lanes at
intersections is generally in accordance with
AUSTROADS Part 14, section 5 and Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Part
9.
COMMENT
Page 9 of 20
Page 11
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Alternative Solutions – Existing pedestrian and cycle paths are located
within Resort Drive. It is anticipated that pedestrian paths provided as
a consequence of the multiple dwelling approvals associated with the
proposed reconfiguration connect into these existing networks.
Page 10 of 20
Page 12
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Complies – Refer to the proposed reconfiguration of a lot plan at
Appendix B.
Water Supply for Fire Fighting
Complies – Adequate water supply will be provided.
Energy Efficiency
Page 11 of 20
Page 13
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Complies – Proposed allotments have been designed to directly
correlate with the approved multiple dwellings over the subject land,
and are of an appropriate dimension and width to accommodate built
form within individual allotments.
Infrastructure
Page 12 of 20
Page 14
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Complies – The subject land is capable of connecting to power and
telecommunications services.
Complies – All services can be provided underground.
Not Applicable – the subject land is included within an urban
settlement.
Page 13 of 20
Page 15
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Complies – All services can be located above 1:100 year ARI.
Complies – No power easements located on-site.
Complies – no electricity substation within 50m.
Earthworks and Stormwater Management
Complies – Stormwater runoff will be managed in accordance with the
design approved under the associated multiple dwelling approvals.
The intended strategy is not intended to change as a consequence of
the proposed reconfiguration.
Page 14 of 20
Page 16
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Complies – All filling and excavation works necessary to support the
approved multiple dwellings over the subject land have been
considered as part of the associated multiple dwelling approvals. The
intended strategy is not intended to change as a consequence of the
proposed reconfiguration.
Landscaping and visual amenity
Complies – Landscape design associated with the multiple dwelling
approvals over the subject land will not change as a consequence of
the proposed reconfiguration.
Complies – As demonstrated with the associated multiple dwelling
MCU approvals over the subject land, vegetation clearing is intended
to be restricted to that which is necessary to accommodate the
approved built form. All buildings will be setback a minimum of 12m
from the eastern and southern property boundary to mitigate
potential bushfire risk.
Not applicable – The proposal is for a reconfiguration of a lot only.
Notwithstanding, built form approved by the associated multiple
dwelling MCU approvals has been assessed (and approved) as
appropriate in terms of visual amenity.
Page 15 of 20
Page 17
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Open space and environmental Protection
Not applicable – Public open space provision is not intended or
required by the proposed reconfiguration.
Not applicable – Active parkland is not intended or required by the
proposed reconfiguration.
Page 16 of 20
Page 18
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Page 17 of 20
[OCR of page images]
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS
AND
$26.2 Active parkland is located on land that is
exclusive of—
a) flood inundation below the 20% AEP (1:5
year ARI level);
b) land affected by stormwater or overland
flow discharge from adjacent allotments;
c) drainage reserves and detention basins,
which cannot be shown to safely and
effectively contribute to the network of
parks and open space areas.
d) land with a slope, or subject to cut and fill
with a batter slope, that exceeds a slope of
1 in 67 (15%);
e€) areas of land less than 15m wide, such as
access and service and utility easements;
f) land required to serve primarily as a buffer
area to any existing development or major
transport corndor, and
g) power easements;
AND
$26.3 Atleast 10% of the total open space
provision for active parkland is exclusive of flood
inundation below the 1% AEP (1:100 year ARI
level or the highest recorded flood level,
whichever is the greatest;
AND
$26.4 Recreational facilities (including
playgrounds, pergolas, barbeques etc.) are
setback a minimum of 30m from the top of the
bank of any watercourse and 10m from the top
of the bank of any drainage line.
COMMENT
Page 17 of 20
Page 19
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Not Applicable – no active parkland proposed with application.
Not applicable – The subject land is zoned Semi-Attached Residential
Complies – As demonstrated with the associated multiple dwelling
MCU approvals over the subject land, vegetation clearing is intended
to be restricted to that which is necessary to accommodate the
approved built form. All buildings will be setback a minimum of 12m
from the eastern and southern property boundary.
Not applicable – There are now stream orders across or within
proximity of the subject land.
Road and rail corridors
Page 18 of 20
Page 20
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Not applicable – The subject land is not located within proximity of
major road networks or a rail corridor.
Access easements
Complies – A proposed access easement is intended to be provided
consistent with the conditions of the associated multiple dwelling
approval.
Traffic
Not applicable – Additional traffic will not be generated as a
consequence of the proposed reconfiguration.
Community Title Development – Residential Uses
Complies – the proposed layered community title scheme aligns with
approved multiple dwelling developments over the subject land.
Page 19 of 20
Page 21
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Alternative Solution – while the subject land is not located within 1km
of land included within the centre/s zone, the proposed
reconfiguration merely seeks to facilitate a staged management and
titling arrangement for approved multiple dwelling developments over
the subject land.
Complies – generous areas of communal space are intended to be
provided as reflected on the proposal plan provided at Appendix A.
This provision is consistent with the extent the areas approved
through the associated multiple dwelling approvals over the subject
land.
Page 20 of 20