Original source · versioned page text
Appendix B - Code Compliance Tables
Attached to the e-mail Resort Drive, Noosa heads - Access Easement @ CTS Reconfiguration of a Lot - REC17/0022.
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Page 9 of 20
[OCR of page images]
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES
h)
dD
k)
has no significant adverse effects on
habitat corndors or areas of significant
native vegetation;
does not create noise attenuation
difficulties;
incorporates pedestrian and cyclist
crossings at intersections or where
required to access high activity nodes and
public transport;
has regard to the potential for conflict
between vehicles, pedestrians and
cyclists; and
incorporates on-road cycling facilities.
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS
$7.4 Road networks provide connectivity
between residential areas, both internally and to
adjoining sites, using access roads
AND
$7.5 The length of a cul-de-sac does not
exceed 200m in urban areas and 500m in rural
areas;
AND
$7.6 The layout uses street and road design,
including variations in carriageway width, as a
traffic calming measure to encourage lower
traffic speeds. (Note: Carriageway widths are
identified in Section 2.3 of PSPS Engineering
Design Standards — Roads, Drainage and
Earthworks.)
AND
$7.7 On-road cycling treatment is utilised to
provide safe and continuous movement of
cyclists along a roadway such as--
a) sealed shoulders:
b) wide kerbside lane;
c) exclusive or peak period bicycle lane;
d) advisory treatments such as Bicycle
Awareness Zone;
e) shared parking / bicycle lane;
f) contra flow bicycle lane; or
g) — bus/bicycle lane;
AND
$7.8 The provision of bicycle lanes at
intersections is generally in accordance with
AUSTROADS Part 14, section 5 and Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Part
9.
COMMENT
Page 9 of 20
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.