Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Joshua Court
.'
4. Conftom that the /ollowing mondatOI)' supporting In/oom.lIon .""omp.nles this appllulion
Mandatory supporting in/oonation Confum !lOll 0/ Metho<lo/
lo<lgement lo<lgemenl
All applications
A site plan drawn 10 an apjrGpriet. scole (1:100,1:200 or 1:500 are g.eonftrmed
re<:ommend<od scales) which shOWsthe r_no:
• the I<>coUonand sne area of Ihe land to whioh the eppClCalioorelales
(relevant IancI)
• the north point
• the boundaries of lIle retevanllend
• any ",ed frontages 0/ the reI~ant land, including the name at the road
• Ih.'<>colion and use of eny existing or proposed buildings or stnJdures
an Ihe r&1~ant J<lnd(note: wIlere exlenslve demoRUon or new buldlngs
are proposed. two separale plans Ian existing site plan and proposed sila
pl<>n]may 00 appropriale)
• any e>dsting or proposed easemants on tne rolevanlland and their
'unetlen
• the location and use of buildings on land adjoining the relevant land
• all vehicle aceess points and any exbling or proposed car parking ...,as
on Ihe rolevanlland. Car parking spact<\ lor I""SOllS with disabjl~ies and
any seNioe vehicle access and parking should be cJoarty mert<ed
• 'or any new building on the ""Ie"",nlland. th.l~ of reruse s1or8ge
• Ihe '<>colion of "IlY proposed retairing wallS on the relevant land and Ihelr
height .
• the locallon of any proposed landscaping on tho ret~v.nllancl .
• the location of any stormwater detention on the relevant land .
I
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking in its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided demonstrated the onsite parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
When the application involves new operational work
Plans shOwW1gthe nalure.looation. number oI"w on-silo ell' parking bays, .0""Confirmed
plOIJOsed .reo of new landscaping. pnaPOSedtypa at new vehicle cross-over
(non-resJdefrtlal •••• s). proposed mwdmum new vehlaJlar se<Vicing
o Not appIlCIl~e
at,angement (non-resldenlllli USU5) of the proposed new operallonel werk.
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
re.quirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 305m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint pr6posed of 3.6m x 204m to approx.
705m x So4m (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
•
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Joshua CourtRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.