Original source · versioned page text
SUPERSEDED NEGOTIATED - OPW25 0042 - REFERENCE DOCUMENT (As Published)
Very large file (18.6 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 9, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
2.1.1 Modelling Parameters
A hydrologic analysis of the Site and contributing catchments has been undertaken to determine the pre and post-development peak
discharges. Key hydrologic model details are provided in Table 2.2.
TABLE 2.2: KEY MODELLING PARAMETERS - HYDROLOGY
Parameter Details Basis / Comments
Software WBNM -
Approach ARR 2019 Methodology -
Pervious Initial and Continuing
31mm / 3.4mm/hr
Losses
ARR Data Hub
Lat: -26.394
Temporal Patterns East Coast North (ECNorth)
Long: 153.085
Pre-Burst Median
BOM Rainfall IFD Data System
IFD - Lat: -26.394
Long: 153.085
2.1.2 Summary of Peak Flows
TABLE 2.3: PEAK DISCHARGE
1% AEP 1% (2100) AEP
Model Outlet 1.91 2.32
2.2 Local Flood Model
Flood modelling of the local catchment has been carried out using TUFLOW software developed by BMT WBM. TUFLOW is a computational
engine that provides one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) solutions for the free surface flow equations to simulate flood and
tidal wave propagation. The Heavily Parallelised Compute (HPC) computational method has been applied using 2023-10-AE version of
TUFLOW. Modelling assumptions and outcomes are described below.
2.2.1 Model Setup
A local flood model has been setup to represent the Proposed scenario for the site and are described below:
• Proposed Scenario (004) – The Proposed Scenario has been prepared to represent the proposed development (including changes to
hydrology, earthworks and associated infrastructure) to assess any potential changes that may result within the drainage path from the
development works.
The TUFLOW hydraulic model been assessed for 1% AEP and 1% AEP Climate Change storm events. The assessment has considered a range
of storm durations (15 min to 120 min) to ensure that the critical storm is defined. Critical duration was under 15 minutes for all events. A
summary of the model setup is detailed below with TUFLOW model setup presented below in Figure 2.2.
Sensitivity Assessment – Three sensitivity assessments were completed for the following arrangements and run for the 1% (2100) AEP event:
DocumentNOOSA
Set ID:CALILE I BBNE01676-0001-REP-001-1
23806878 6
Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.