Original source · versioned page text
Bulk_20240820151717 (1).pdf
Noosa Council documents
Information Required
3. Amend the design to reduce the appearance of bulk to more successfully respond to
PO8 of the Low Density Residential zone code (below).
PO8 Development:
a) is of a scale compatible with surrounding development and the particular circumstances
of the site;
b) has a low site impact to maximise the opportunity to retain site characteristics,
such as native vegetation and natural landforms;
c) allows the opportunity to provide soft landscaping between buildings;
d) does not present an appearance of bulk to adjacent properties, roads or other areas in
the vicinity of the site.
Issue – Location of Infiltration Trenches
Section 6.4 of Tectonic’s Geotechnical Investigation (24096-001-Rev0) dated 18 June 2024
recommends that roof water is discharged along Ross Crescent where physically possible
otherwise any infiltration occur at least 10m upslope of the rear boundary.
It is unclear from Westera Partners’ Stormwater Management Report if:
a. the location of the two proposed infiltration trenches complies with the above
recommendation; or
b. any roof water can be discharged into Council’s existing stormwater system along
Ross Crescent.
Information Required
4. Provide confirmation by a suitably qualified representative of Westera Partners’ that:
a. The location of the proposed infiltration trenches aligns with the recommendations
contained in Tectonic’s Geotechnical Investigation (24096-001-Rev0) dated 18
June 2024; and
b. A meaningful area of roof water cannot reasonably be discharged into Council’s
existing stormwater system along Ross Crescent.
Issue – Increase in Fraction Impervious & Stormwater Capacity
Section 3 of Westera Partners’ Stormwater Management Report details that detention of
stormwater is not required despite the proposed increase in fraction impervious from ~16% to
~37%. Insufficient detail has been provided to demonstrate that the proposed infiltration
trenches have sufficient capacity and the necessary infiltration rate to limit the post-
development peak flow from exceeding the pre-development peak flow during events up to
and including the DFE.
Council is concerned that the development may adversely alter the existing drainage regime
of the site and cause downstream nuisance by failing to disperse flow back to sheet flow if the
infiltration pit surcharges during events up to and including the DFE.
Information Required
5. Provide additional detail by a suitably qualified representative of Westera Partners’ that
demonstrates:
Page 3 of 5
Document Set ID: 23198100
Version: 3, Version Date: 20/08/2024 Print Date: 20 August 2024, 3:17 PM
[OCR of page images]
Noosa Council documents
Information Required
3. | Amend the design to reduce the appearance of bulk to more successfully respond to
PO8 of the Low Density Residential zone code (below).
PO8 Development:
a) is ofascale compatible with surrounding development and the particular circumstances
of the site;
b) has alow site impact to maximise the opportunity to retain site characteristics,
such as native vegetation and natural landforms;
c) allows the opportunity to provide soft landscaping between buildings;
d) does not present an appearance of bulk to adjacent properties, roads or other areas in
the vicinity of the site.
Issue — Location of Infiltration Trenches
Section 6.4 of Tectonic’s Geotechnical Investigation (24096-001-Rev0O) dated 18 June 2024
recommends that roof water is discharged along Ross Crescent where physically possible
otherwise any infiltration occur at least 10m upslope of the rear boundary.
It is unclear from Westera Partners’ Stormwater Management Report if:
a. the location of the two proposed infiltration trenches complies with the above
recommendation; or
b. any roof water can be discharged into Council’s existing stormwater system along
Ross Crescent.
Information Required
4. Provide confirmation by a suitably qualified representative of Westera Partners’ that:
a. The location of the proposed infiltration trenches aligns with the recommendations
contained in Tectonic’s Geotechnical Investigation (24096-001-RevO) dated 18
June 2024; and
b. A meaningful area of roof water cannot reasonably be discharged into Council's
existing stormwater system along Ross Crescent.
Issue — Increase in Fraction Impervious & Stormwater Capacity
Section 3 of Westera Partners’ Stormwater Management Report details that detention of
stormwater is not required despite the proposed increase in fraction impervious from ~16% to
~37%. Insufficient detail has been provided to demonstrate that the proposed infiltration
trenches have sufficient capacity and the necessary infiltration rate to limit the post-
development peak flow from exceeding the pre-development peak flow during events up to
and including the DFE.
Council is concerned that the development may adversely alter the existing drainage regime
of the site and cause downstream nuisance by failing to disperse flow back to sheet flow if the
infiltration pit surcharges during events up to and including the DFE.
Information Required
5. Provide additional detail by a suitably qualified representative of Westera Partners’ that
demonstrates:
Document Set ID: 23198100 Page 3 of 5
Version: 3, Version Date: 20/08/2024 Print Date: 20 August 2024, 3:17 PM
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (Bulk_20240820151717 (1).pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.