Original source · versioned page text
2019-10-28 Special Meeting Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 3 - RAL18-0023 - Master Plan Stage 1
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn CHOOSING FUTURES: Shire Business Centre Master Plan - Stage 1 8
L
MAP 2.2 S ITE IOONSTRAINTS
CNE
LD 2.4 CONSULTATION PROCESSES
ON
OV
AN
DR
EE
NI
Section 19.3.1.6 of the Strategic Plan requires that
EC Potential Elf the master plan will be prepared in consultation with
RE K RD
COMMERCE CT EK Skink Habitat EENIE CREE
RD relevant stakeholders including the developer, Noosa
Council, State Government agencies and the local
LEO A
LLEY R
design community and the key stakeholders. It will
D
also include consultation with the general
community.
RO
ON ST
ST
In early 1999, Montbar Pty Ltd approached Noosa
AD
Constraint
ACTION
13
TI
Council for advice on Section 19.3.1.6. Noosa
1
PRODUC
Council gave consideration to the process for
consultation that should be followed and protocols
and guiding principles were established (Council
Decision 15/04/1999). Consultation was to be
a
managed via a series of reference groups :
Significant
Constraint • Design Reference Group;
• Business Reference Group;
• Community Reference Group; and
• State Agency Reference Group.
This process commenced and continued until Spring
1999, when representatives of Montbar advised that
an application would be lodged. Up until lodgement
of the application, the reference groups (including
k
Noosa Council representatives) had access to most,
Cree
but not all of that material accompanying the Montbar
Eenie
application referenced as Baseline Reports.
From the Montbar application itself, the reference
The constraints that have influenced the groups had not had access to:
considerations made in Map 2.2 have included: a. The various impact assessment reports;
• Flooding; b. The Noosa Shire Business Centre MasterPlan;
• Presence of acid sulphate soils; and
• Ecological corridors; c. The Material Change of Use Planning Report.
• Proximity of potential development areas to The process of consultation in the development of a
Eenie Creek; master plan initiated via Council’s decision of
15/04/1999 remains incomplete. Therefore the
• Environmental drainage corridors; master plan accompanying the Montbar development
• Potential elf skink habitat; and application does not fulfil the requirements of Section
19.3.1.6 of the Strategic Plan.
• The location of the Noosa Airport.
For those areas that suffer significant constraint,
there are major influences for the development of the
site. Desirably, these areas should be left in their
natural state. For those other areas suffering
constraint, their influences are not as significant,
however there may be restrictions on the type or
scale of activity that can be supported in these areas.
2.3 CONSULTANT ADVICE
As part of the review of the Montbar application,
Noosa Council obtained advice from various
consultants. This Master Plan draws from that advice
and particularly that contained in:
• Survey of Noosa Shire Retailers (Urban
Economics, 2000a); and
• Independent Review of the Strategic Plan
Provisions relating to the Noosa Shire Business
Centre (Urban Economics, 2000b).
a
The appendix at Section 6 on page 26 identifies
membership of the various reference groups.
n
a Pla s
s
N o o uture
e F
J C:\Documents and Settings\oludvigsen\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7\Master Plan.doc Th o s ing
o
Ch
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.