Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

J'S Objection To Development Application MCU21 (1)

Attached to the e-mail PM Submission (Second) - Jeannette Ince - MCU21/0154.

of 2

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

      OBJECTION TO DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION MCU21/0154

              “SMALL SCALE MEAT PROCESSING PLANT”



As a local resident of Wallaby Lane, Tinbeerwah, I strongly object
to this development application as it is incompatible with Noosa
Plan 2020 on the following grounds:

  •    The property at 82 Patterson Drive (Lot 62, Property ID 153292)
       sits within “Agricultural Land- Conservation Area”, and as such
       a meat processing facility is incompatible with Noosa Plan 2020.

  •    It additionally sits within the layer “Environment-Enhance or
       Protect” and YES is very clearly stated alongside that
       category

  •    The same Noosa Plan 2020 identifies this zone as “Koala Priority
       Habitat’ and “Core Koala Habitat”. As residents of this area we
       can confirm koalas are heard at night, and this has been reported to
       Queensland Koala Crusaders.

  •    The property sits within the Lake MacDonald catchment, Map
       Code OMBWW(ii)4, thus runoff water flows to Noosa drinking water

  •    The location of proposed business building does not fit within
       Noosa Plan 2020 which states
       AO6.1: “Buildings …. Containing areas of animal waste and
       by-product disposal are not within 100 metres of:
       a)the boundary of another property in a rural residential zone
       b)an existing dwelling on an adjoining property
       c)the boundary of adjoining properties in the environmental
       management and conservation zone

  •    Even though Noosa Council may wish to support home based
       businesses, Noosa Plan 2020 (6.3.1.2)clearly states they will
       only support:
       (2) h. “home based business…..compatible with residential
       character and amenity of the locality”
       This proposed development of an existing business, which obviously
       has been operating without permits, fits into “Industry” – “Low
       Impact Industry” Zone, and as such should be located within an
       Industrial Estate such as Jarrah Street, Cooroy, where Food
       Profilers, a facility which is already being utilized for some of the
       applicant’s existing production, is located.




                                                                           1
Log in to download the original file

J'S OBJECTION TO DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION MCU21 (1).pdf · 49 KB (small file)

Full text of the other 1 page

Page 2

  •   Operating a meat processing facility in one’s backyard in no way
      contributes positively to the Shire’s economy and employment,
      unless one intends to expand that facility to be a large scale
      production.

  •   It could be expected that the waste materials from a business such
      as this , no matter how “safe” the waste water treatment, will
      encourage (among other pests) feral animals and wild dogs .. so
      harmful to our native wildlife and killing machines to our koalas.

  •   The applicant’s business plan states “a line of ready made meals,
      pastries and sausages to go alongside … wild venison” which
      indicates expansion and an even greater future impact on the
      amenity of the area


As I have stated above, this development application is entirely
inconsistent and incompatible with a Rural Residential Area.
Residents of this area choose to live on larger blocks for enhanced
lifestyle and rural amenity, without the distress of odours, noise,
increased traffic and environmental damage.

I’m sure when Noosa Council proposed “support for home based
businesses “they did not envisage a business such as a meat works in the
middle of houses with families, native wildlife (in particular our
endangered koalas), and quiet rural environments.
Part of the proposer’s business argument is “to kill wild deer which are
pests and threaten our native animals”. I would argue that a facility such
as this, in the midst of a Council Zoned Environmental Protected
area, will be far more a threat to native wildlife than wild deer.


I expect Noosa Council Officers to have sense to refuse this
application as I believe the intent of the Noosa Plan 2020 to
support home based businesses would NEVER have been to
support industrial activities within a residential area.

If this application is successful, it may well set an unwanted
precedent for “home based business” in the whole of the Noosa
Shire and have unintended consequences for the Council and
residents alike.


Jeannette Ince
6 Wallaby Lane
Tinbeerwah



                                                                           2

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.