Original source · versioned page text
Minor Change Request
Attached to the e-mail Minor Change Application MCU19/0017.03 & RAL19/0004.03 - DA Form 5 - Owners Consent - Change Request - Proposal Plans - 36-40 Hofmann Drive Noosaville.
Attached to the e-mail Minor Change Application Lodgement - 36-40 Hofmann Drive Noosaville.
Description / Provisions Comment / Response
A change may be considered to result in a substantially different development if the proposed
change:
• Involves a new use; or No new use is proposed.
• Results in the application applying to a No new land is included as part of the
new parcel of land; or application.
• Dramatically changes the built form in The proposed changes do not dramatically
terms of scale, bulk and appearance; or change the built form in terms of scale, bulk
and appearance.
• Changes the ability of the proposed No changes are made to the proposed
development to operate as intended (for development to impede its operations.
example, reducing the size of a retail
complex may reduce the capacity of the
complex to service the intended
catchment); or
• Removes a component that is integral to The proposed changes do not involve
the operation of the development; or removal of a component that is integral to
the operational of the development.
• Significantly impacts on traffic flow and the The proposed changes will not result in
transport network, such as increasing significant impacts on traffic flow and the
traffic to the site; or transport network, such as increasing traffic
to the site.
• Introduces new impacts or increases the The proposed change does not introduce
severity of known impacts; or any new impacts, nor will it increase the
severity of known impacts.
• Removes an incentive or offset No incentive or offset components
component that would have balanced the incorporated.
negative impact of the development; or
• Impacts on infrastructure provisions. The proposed development does not impact
upon infrastructure provisions.
The original application did not trigger any referral agency assessment and no referral agency
assessment is now triggered with the changes.
ASSESSMENT
Pursuant to Clause 81 (4) & (5) the responsible entity must consider the statutory instrument,
or other document, as in effect when the development application for the development
approval was properly made.
However, the responsible entity may give the weight the responsible entity considers is
appropriate, in the circumstances, to—
(a) the statutory instrument or other document as in effect when the change
application was made; or
(b) if the statutory instrument or other document is amended or replaced after the
change application is made but before it is decided—the amended or replacement
instrument or document; or
(c) another statutory instrument—
(i) that comes into effect after the change application is made but before it is
decided; and
(ii) that the responsible entity would have been required to consider if the
instrument had been in effect when the development application for the
development approval was properly made.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original