Change Representations - Eumundi Noosa Rd · MCU24/0125

Page 2

       1.2. Amended proposal plans to relocate visitor car park 4 from the access
       handle/easement to a suitable location closer to Units 12-15.

The amended plans have relocated the visitor bay from the easement to a suitable location
in front of units 14 and 15 at the end of the shared aisle. The engineering and landscaping
plans are included demonstrating the spaces do not interfere with any manoeuvring and/or
servicing.




       1.3. Sensitive spaces, such as bedroom within 3m of noise generating areas
       are to be acoustically treated with treatments shown on the amended
       proposal plans, such as double glazing to ensure that the acoustic privacy
       of these areas is achieved.

Detailed finishes are provided for each unit showing privacy screening between each unit.
A condition can be included and the BCA also includes detailed requirements for multiple
dwelling units to include appropriate acoustic treatment. It is requested for an appropriate
condition to be included in this regard.

Page 3

       1.4. Amended proposal plans to clearly detail that the pool and terrace areas
       and upper level balcony and windows are appropriately screened or treated
       to minimise overlooking into the private open space areas of adjoining
       residents.

An additional plan is included to describe the relationship and privacy between the units
4-11 & 12-15, as per the images below. The images clearly detail the treatments to
minimise overlooking including high level windows, podium planting, fencing and screens.




       1.5. Confirm whether the combination of fill, retaining walls and fencing
       results in some overall fence heights of approximately 4m, when viewed from
       the adjoining properties and address the potential amenity impacts resulting
       from this outcome. Where necessary, amend the proposal plans to address
       any impacts that cannot be managed through reasonable and relevant
       conditions.

Additional sections are provided to demonstrate the relationship of the fence heights in
relation to the adjoining development. Fences are to be a maximum of 2m along the
boundaries of the site.

Page 4

       1.6. Confirm the methodology used to determine the proposed site cover
       shown on the proposal plans. Specifically, why several portions of the built
       form of Units 1-5, 8, 10, 12-15, have been excluded from the site cover
       calculation.

An updated site cover calculation is provided with clarification about the roof line cut outs,
as shown below. These areas are connected to the ground and not roofed, which is not
considered site cover.




       1.7. Where required, provide amended landscaping, reconfiguring a lot and
       operational works plans to reflect any changes made to the proposal plans.

All plans have been coordinated with updated changes to allow for the approval of all
drawings as part of the development permit.




2.     This development approval lapses if the requirements of the conditions have
       not been completed and lodged with Council by 1 April 2027, unless an
       application to extend the currency period is approved by Council.

The currency condition requires amendment to allow for the approval with a currency of 6
years from the development permit being issued.

Page 5

3. Prior to Council issuing a Development Permit, provide an amended Stormwater
 Management Plan and associated Engineering Drawings that incorporates an
allowance for climate change in accordance with Performance Outcome 2 of the
Water Quality and Drainage Code. The amended package must include amendments
to Engeny’s Stormwater Management Plan and associated Engineering Drawings
prepared by TOD Consulting, be prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ),
and include in particular:

       3.1. allowance for a 20% increase in rainfall intensity by the year 2100 for all
       modelled scenarios (10% and 1% AEP event);
       3.2. a revised assessment of non-worsening based on like-for-like scenarios
       for climate change scenarios, based on the 1% AEP event (2100);
       3.3. revised internal site drainage drawings and calculations to include a
       climate change allowance; and
       3.4. additional detail demonstrating how the “gap flow” has been calculated
       – nothing that Section 4.1 of the Stormwater Management Plan suggests that
       development flows in excess of the pipe network fail to report to the existing
       bioretention basin in Ely Street.

TODs development engineers provide updated engineering and stormwater management
plans, incorporating minor modifications to the stormwater calculations sheet. It is also
recognised there are no requirements to increase any pipe sizes of the building.



4. Prior to Council issuing a Development Permit, provide a Waste Management
       Plan demonstrating that all waste servicing and collection is to occur onsite.
       The Waste Management Plan must be prepared by a suitably qualified person
       and include, in particular:
       4.1. onsite collection of refuse/recycling must be undertaken using 1,100
       litre, low-noise waste containers – waste servicing, include the storage of
       waste containers, must occur in locations that minimise the amenity impact
       on adjacent properties.
       4.2. provision for on-site servicing by a Refuse Collection Vehicle (i.e.,
       Dennis Eagle Elite 2 6x4 with rear lift configuration) – the Refuse Collection
       Vehicle must be able to enter and exit the site in a forward gear while
       remaining wholly within the access driveway (i.e., the access handle to
       Starboard Avenue).
       4.3. If a Refuse Collection Vehicle is unable to remain wholly within the
       access driveway, provide a revised development layout that accommodate
       on-site manoeuvring of a Refuse Collection Vehicle; and
       4.4. Compliance with The Noosa Plan 2020 – Waste Management Code and
       PSP9 Waste Management.

The proposal demonstrates appropriate onsite collection points for 1,100L containers
located within the driveways of the development site. Swept path diagrams are included
with the engineering plans demonstrating compliance.

Page 6

Both MCU21/0156 & MCU23/0094 for much larger unit developments included the
following conditions regarding waste management, which does not require a waste
management plan. The plans demonstrate sufficient detail for the provision of onsite waste
management and a similar condition shall be included for this application.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please provide any draft conditions for a full Development Permit at your earliest
convenience.

If you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact
myself.


Regards,




Jack Lewis B.Sc Hons UNSW M.Plan Otago RPIA
Planner/Director
Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
0406 334 227