Original source · versioned page text
2021-06-08 Planning & Environment Committee Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (18.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 8 JUNE 2021 3 MCU20/0037 PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO. BD1074 OF 2021 - REFUSAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR MULTIPLE HOUSING - TYPE 2 DUPLEX AT 11 MARGIT CRES, SUNRISE BEACH Author Manager Development Assessment, Kerri Coyle Environment & Sustainable Development Department Index ECM/ Application/ MCU20/0037/ Case/ Cottee & Ferraro Attachments 1. Proposal Plans (26 page attachment provided separately to this report) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Not applicable RECOMMENDATION That Council note the report by the Manager Development Assessment to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 8 June 2021 regarding Planning & Environment Court Appeal No. BD1074 of 2021 and agree to defend the appeal. REPORT On 8 April 2021, an application under the Noosa Plan 2006 to remove the existing dwelling and develop the site for a duplex dwelling comprising 2 x 3 bedroom dwelling units was refused: 1. The proposal results in a development that does not comply with the following provisions of the Noosa Plan 2006 Eastern Beaches Locality Code: a. Overall Outcomes 7.7.2g), h) and mm) as the scale and form of the proposed building is not in keeping with the surrounding streetscape and development, and the garages will dominate and present poorly to the street. b. Specific Outcomes O3, O4, O5 and O6 as the proposal exceeds the maximum density, building height, site cover and gross floor area sought for the Eastern Beaches locality, proposes insufficient side setbacks and: i. will be imposing on the neighbouring properties and visually dominate the street; ii. will not be compatible with development in the surrounding area; iii. will present excessive building bulk to adjacent and surrounding properties, and the street; and iv. does not allow for sufficient landscaping and spacing between the proposed building and neighbouring properties. c. Specific Outcomes O39 and O42 as the garages are not articulated, span most of the site’s frontage, do not visually integrate with the building and will dominate the street front. 2. The proposal is not consistent with the built form requirements of the Noosa Plan 2020. Page 29 of 119
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.