Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

SUPERSEDED Negotiated Decision Notice - Concurrence Agency - EPA [As Published] · 142007.1173

of 13

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

2007/1173




 11 of 13


[OCR of page images]
2007/1173

 

ecoaccess

environmental bcences and permits
Response

Concurrence Agency Response

 

Additional information for applicants

This response does not authorise environmental harm unless a concurrence agency condition within this
response explicitly authorises that harm Where there ts no condition, or the development approval is silent
on a matter, the lack of a condition or silence shall not be construed as authorising harm

It is a requirement of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 that if the owner or occupier of this site
becomes aware a Notifiable Activity (as defined under Schedule 2 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994)
ts being carned out on this land or that the land has been affected by a hazardous contaminant, they must,
within twenty two (22) business days after becoming aware the activity is being carried out, give notice to the
Environmental Protection Agency A list of Notifiable Activities is provided within Schedule 2 of the
Environmental Protection Act 1994

This concurrence response pursuant to the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and assessed against section 104
of the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995 does not remove the need to obtain any further
approvals for this development which may be required pursuant to this or other legislation, both State and
Commonwealth Applicants are advised to check with all relevant statutory authorities for such approvals as
may be required

Additional information for the Assessment Manager:

The Environmental Protection Agency referral agency jurisdiction for the development application ts confined
to that aspect of the application involving the triggers identified in the response EPA has no referral
agency jurisdiction in relation to other aspects of the development application.

In this regard it should be noted that the State Coastal Management Plan 2001 and SEQ Regional Coastal
Management Plan 2006 which, for the purposes of making a statutory decision, has the same effect as a
state planning policy The assessment manager Is required to give due consideration to the relevant State
planning policies when deciding the application

Should you have any queries in relation to this Response, please contact lan Biggs, the Project Manager, on the
telephone listed below

Yours sincerely

Be) ae

 

‘Signature Decision Date
Ben Sale Enquiries:
Manager (Sunshine Coast Office) Environmental Services
Brisbane North Region Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Services GPO Box 2771 Brisbane Qld 4001
Environmental Protection Agency Telephone 3225 1209

Facsimile 3225 8723

 

Page 3 of 3 + 09/03 Version 11 Environmental Protection Agency

11 of 13

Used in these records

About this file

File size
351 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

SUPERSEDED Negotiated Decision Notice - Concurrence Agency - EPA [As Published].pdf · 351 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.