Council archive · source document
08/1128 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1128
Very large file (18.3 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Blue Care Sunshine Beach Response to Sunshine Coat Regional Council. Information Request 1 Introduction Arup was commissioned by Blue Care in.April 2008 to undertake a traffic impact assessment for the proposed Blue Care Facility to be located at Grasstree Court (and Ben Lexcen Drive), Sunrise Beach. Arup subsequently provided a Traffic Impact Assessment report, included as part of the development application. Upon review of this application, Sunshine Coast Regional Council has issued an Information Request, dated 11 August 2008. This document is included as Appendix A. Queries with the application relating to traffic and Arup’s Traffic Impact Assessment report were raised in items 13-14, 47-52, 53-58 and 59-64 of Council's Information Request. This report offers response to these issues. The plans for the development have been revised since submission of the development apptication. The revised plans, amended to reflect issues raised by Council in the Information Request, are included as Appendix B. Please refer to Arup’s Traffic impact Assessment Report, dated 24 Juné 2008 (included as Appendix C) for any traffic engineering issues relating to the proposed development not discussed in this report. 1.1 Limits of Report The above tasks have been carried out based on information supplied by other members of the project team. While Arup has taken care in the preparation of this report, it neither accepts liability nor responsibility whatsoever in respect of: — any use of this report by any third party; and — any third party whose interests may be affected by any decision made regarding the contents of this report. 1.2 Safety in Design Within the scope of our design activities, we have identified safety in design issues and potential hazards, whenever reasonably practicable within our field of expertise. Due to our limited and upfront rote on this project, it is not considered reasonably practicable to identify all potential hazards which may occur throughout the life of a project, including during construction activities. For any ensuing design stages, it is strongly recommended our advice regarding safety in design be reviewed and revised as required, to reflect any changes to the current design. JASBOOO\ES1Z\66\IOOCUMENTS\REPORTSIREPORT Page 3 Arup TITLEAFINAL\OO04REPORT_RFI_V2.00C 15 October 2008
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/1128 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 18.3 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.