Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

08/1128 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1128

of 116

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (18.3 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Blue Care

Sunrise Beach

Response to Sunshine Coast Regional Council Information Request

3.2.3. Ben Lexcen Drive, Eenie Creek Road and Heathland Drive
This intersection was analysed with and without the proposed development for the 2022

design year in both the AM and PM peak period. A simple two-phase signal operation with
filter right turns was assumed.

Table 3.2.3a — Intersection Analysis Results 2022 AM Peak

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2022 AM intersection Analysis Results Background Volumes Design Volumes
Approach Direction Movement DOS (%) | Queue Delay (s) | DOS (%) | Queue Delay (s)

{m) (m)
Ben Lexcen | N/B L 82 134 42 87 153 47
Drive T 82 134 34 87 153 39
R 5 5 33 6 5 33
Heathland WwiB L 52 105. 20 53 107 20
Drive T 52 105 12 53 107 12
R 30 31 34 30 31 24
BenLexcen | S/B L 18 30 32 20 32 32
Drive T 18 30 23 20 32 23
R 62 32 51 71 33 §3
Eenie E/B L 39 75 19 39 76 19
Creek Road T 39 75 1 39 76 11
R 81 97 42 84 105 46

Table 3.2.3b — Intersection Analysis Results 2022 PM Peak .

2022 PM Intersection Analysis Results Background Volumes Design Volumes

Approach Olrection Movement DOS (%) | Queue Delay (s) | DOS (%) | Queue Oelay (s)
(m) (m)

Ben Lexcen | N/B L 58 84 30 61 89 30
Drive T 58 84 21 61 89 22
R 5 4 27 5 _ 4 27
Heathland WIB L 47 82 21 46 82 21
Drive T 47 82 12 46 82 12
R 23 25 24 23 25 24
Ben Lexcen | S/B L 12 19 26 14 22 26
Drive T 12 19 18 14 22 18
R 25 19 37 27 19 37
Eenie E/B L 35 61 20 35 61 20
Creek Road T 35 61 12 35 61 12
R 60 57 29 63 61 30

 

 

 

The above results indicate that the development will not adversely impact on the
intersection operation in the 2022 design year in either the AM or PM peak periods.

 

JABEOON\8ES 1216610 OC UMENTS\REPORTSIREPORT
TITLE\FINALIOOO4REPORT_RFI_V2.D0C

Page 15

Arup
Draft 1 15 October 2008

Used in these records

About this file

File size
18.3 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_1128 - Response to Information Request [As Published].pdf · 18.3 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.