Council archive · source document
130814 Permissible Change Request Final · MCU14/0073
Attached to the e-mail OPW13/1038.01 Request to Change to existing approval.
Our ref: 130814 Permissible Change 290115 rmr Council's ref: MCU14/0073 & OPW13/0138 27 February 2015 The Chief Executive Officer Noosa Shire Council PO Box 141 TEWANTIN QLD 4565 Attention: Denis Wallace Dear Denis, Re: Request for a Permissible Change to a Development Permit Development Permit for Material Change of Use and Operational Work 271 Lake Macdonald Drive, Lake Macdonald QLD 4563 (Lot 2 on SP108094) Council Ref: MCU14/0073 & OPW13/1038 In accordance with Section 369(1)(e) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA), please find enclosed a Permissible Change request in relation to the approved Material Change of Use and Operational Works in relation to the Wimmers Soft Drink Factory (Council ref: MCU14/0073 & OPW13/1038). This request is made on behalf of the owner of the subject site, Cooroy Property Pty Ltd. In support of the Permissible Change Request, please find enclosed the following: Council’s Request to Change An Existing Approval Form (Attachment 1); Revised Operational Works Drawings prepared by Barlow Shelly, including Development Layout Plan (Attachment 2); Revised Landscape Plans prepared by Mark Baldock Landscape Architect (Attachment 3); and, Payment of $935.00 being the relevant Council fee as confirmed by Council. BACKGROUND A previous development permit for Operational Works was issued by Council dated 25 February 2014 under the Noosa Plan (Council ref: OPW13/1038) for engineering works (Roadworks, Drainage Works, Stormwater and Landscaping). These works were in support of the establishment of the Wimmers Factory. More recently, an extension (Stage 2) to the factory was approved by Council (MCU14/0073), which sought to increase the floor area by 3,021m2 to allow for an increase in manufacturing and storage as required during peak operations. Some minor changes to the layout and design of the proposed factory and parking area were also made under this approval. As a result, this Permissible Change seeks to amend the Material Change of Use and Operational Works Approval to reflect Stages 1 and 2 of the Wimmers Factory development, including the revised layout and parking areas as shown by the drawings within Attachments 2 & 3. It has been confirmed by Council’s Senior Development Planner, Denis Wallace that this request constitutes a Permissible Change in accordance with section 367 of the SPA. The proposed amendments will not impact any additional properties and are a logical and appropriate outcome for the approved development. Details of the proposed amendments are provided in the following sections.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of pages 2 to 15 (of 23)
Page 2
2
PERMISSIBLE CHANGE
As previously outlined, the revised plans within Attachments 2 & 3 are to be included as Approved Plans in accordance with
the most recent Material Change of Use approval (MCU14/0073) and Operational Works approval (OPW13//1038).
Permissible Change under Section 367
The proposed changes to the original Development Permit and associated conditions, comply with the definition of a
Permissible Change as defined in Section 367 of the SPA. The Act permits an assessment manager to consider a change to
an approval where the change is a Permissible Change. The definition of Permissible Change is as follows:
1) A permissible change for a development approval, is a change to the approval that would not-
(a) result in a substantially different development; or
(b) if the application for the approval were remade including the change-
(i) require referral to additional concurrence agencies;
(ii) for an approval for assessable development that previously did not require impact
assessment; or
(c) for an approval for assessable development that previously required impact assessment- be
likely, in the responsible entity's opinion, to cause a person to make a properly made submission
objecting to the proposed change, it the circumstances allowed; or
(d) cause development to which the approval relates to include prohibited development"
In relation to the above definition, we make the following comments:
The proposed amendment will not result in a substantially different development to that, which was approved
and is in accordance with a higher order approval;
The proposed Permissible Change does not result in a significant change to conditions within the approval;
The proposed changes would not require any additional referrals to the State Assessment Referral Agency;
The proposed changes would not cause a person to make a properly made submission objecting to the
proposed change; and,
The proposed changes do not involve prohibited development.
For these reasons outlined above, it is considered that the proposed changes constitute a Permissible Change to the
approved development. On this basis, it is considered that the request should be dealt with pursuant to provisions outlined
within Sections 369 and 377 of the SPA.
We trust the information provides you with sufficient information in relation to the proposal and we look forward to receiving a
positive decision from Council at your earliest convenience.
Should you have any further questions in relation to this matter, please feel free to contact me direct.
Yours faithfully,
ADAMS + SPARKES
TOWN PLANNING + DEVELOPMENT
Cameron Adams
MANAGING DIRECTOR
Encl: Attachment 1 Request to Change an Existing Approval form
Attachment 2 Revised Operational Works Plans prepared by Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers
Attachment 3 Revised Landscape Plans prepared by Mark Baldock Landscape Architect
Cc: SARA
Page 3
Attachment 1 Change to an Existing Approval Form [OCR of page images] Attachment 1 Change to an Existing Approval Form
Page 4
Ex ting Approval and/or | xtension to Relevant Period . a -2otais Sustainable Planning Act 2009 ALL questions MUST be. completed unless the form indicates otherwise. ‘This form must be submitted to. Council accompanied by the applicable fee. | Attach extra pages if there | is insufficient space on the for @): a request to change the ‘development approval and/or condit ons is made to the oe : ©) a request to. extend the relevant period for the approval is made to Gouna: 1. Details of person making the request ull name ~ individual or company Cooroy Property Pty Ltd c/- ADAMS + SPARKES Town Planning + Development Sibu Buda oo . an state QLD TTT Posed 4673 Business phone 07 5313 7705 AIH phone _ Mobile Email address [email protected] _ Fax 2. Details of existing approval Type of approval (please tick ALL applicable categories) Which entity issued approval? KH Development Permit Council Preliminary Approval 1 Other entity — please specify Compliance Permit Material Change of Use i Reconfiguring a Lot i Operational Works Building Works : Plumbing or Drainage Works Compliance Certificate Environmentally Relevant Activity L Application number/council reference MCU14/0073 & opwiantoas ‘| Date issued 19/12/14 & 25/2/14 ls the approval for a mobile and temporary ERA? EH No O Yes — complete below insert the name of each local | government area in which the mobile and temporary ERA is proposed to operate/operating DOO00w@onoo Privacy Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining in contact with you. Council is authorised to collect this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Government Acts. Your personal information is only accessed by persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council's privacy policy. www.noosa.gid.gov.au [email protected] T 07 5329 6500 PO Box 141 Tewantin Qid 4565 ABN 97 969 214 121 Page i of 4
Page 5
i
3. Nature of request (please tick ALL applicable categories)
BI To change the development 0 To change the development ‘a To extend the relevant period
approval _ : conditions : before lapsing
Please attach documentation outlining the detail of and the reasons and justification for the requested change or
extension.
4. Location of the premises
Unit No. _ Street No 971 __ ‘Street Lake Macdonald Drive
Suburb ‘Lake Macdonald | State QLD “Postcode 4563
- SP108094
5. Concurrence Agencies
Was there one or more concurrence agencies involved in the original approval?
Note - Under 5372 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009:the person
concurrence agenci
‘Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning
6. Pre-request response notice
Has a pre-request response been given by a relevant entity (e.g. a concurrence agency) for this request?
ANo ‘Yes
- if Fyes; ‘please- attach. a copy. of the notice.
Te ON Ua ecu
Is the owner's consent required for this request? Ri No
0 Yes— complete either Table A or Table B below
Note — If more than one owner of the land < alt owners’ details are required
Owner's name/s ------nrnrrrn
Owner's name/s
lo
Oo
We, the above-mentioned owner/s of the land, consent O The owner's written consent is attached.
| Signature/s
Date
Page 2 of 4
Page 6
. NOTES: ‘For question 7 "Under section 371 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, if the person making the requests is “not ‘the: owner. of the land to which the approval relates, the request must be accompanied by the owner's consent... : ' However, owner's consent is not tequired if the approval: iS relates to. land the was acquisition land. to. which section 263(2)(d) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 applied. when ‘the ies application for the approval was made; or me is, for building. work or “operational work for. the © eupply of community infrastructure ‘on tand- designated for the community infrastructure; or i =~ the: consent of the owner would not be required under section 263(1) of the Sustainable Planning ‘Act 2009 fa development application were made for the requested change. : Also, owner's consent is not required if the Assessment Manager i is satisfied that: |= the number of | owners” of the land make it impractical to obtain owners! consent, and the ‘requested change does not materaly |.» affect the owners’ land, or : = ‘having regard to the. nature of the proposed change, the owner has unreasonably withheld consent and the fequested change : does not materially affect the owner's land.» : 8. Does the request involve a State resource eae mu the SustainablePianning Regulation 2009, Schedule 14? [3 No | a Yes — — complete below details Nature of State owned resource: - eee EE Nature of Evidence required: a “Evidence of allocation of /| entitlement to, the re resource | a Evidence the chief executive has agreed to the request | ‘Attach a copy of the evidence required above NOTES: For. r question s : nee : ; “regulation may. te the epnicaton to be supped y certain evidence = precerbed under regulation. Schedule tA-of the’ ‘Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 prescribes the State resources for which evidence is. fequired to be given, and the evidence Tequired, to ‘support the | applicatior : 9. Declaration of applicant : : ' (We, the applicant, declare that the above information is correct in all respects, at the time of lodgement of this /application with Council. Should any of the details given in relation to this application be changed in the future, the applicant shall advise Council in writing prior to any such change being implemented. Signatures (~. lion, - Date 27 /oi/, Lore” ood Page 3 of 4
Page 7
Payment options
In person
By mail
9 Pelican Street, Tewantin: 8.30 am to 4.30 pm Monday to Friday (excludes public holidays). |
Cheque or money order to be made payable to Noosa Council. _
1 Cheque '() Money order _O Mastercard fd Visa
I
vol
Page 4 of 4
Page 8
Attachment 2 Revised Operational Works Plans prepared by Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers
Page 9
OPERATIONAL WORKS
WIMMERS FACTORY
AT LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE, LAKE MACDONALD
FOR COOROY PROPERTY PTY LTD
JOB No. 1014
- SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL - SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS
DWG DESCRIPTION
1014-R01 Locality Plan and Schedule of Drawings
1014-R02 Existing Features Plan
LAKE 1014-R03 Development Layout Plan
MACDONALD 1014-R04 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Details
1014-R05 Lake Macdonald Drive (External Works) & Visitors Carparking Details
1014-R06 Roadworks and Drainage Plan - Internal Work
1014-R07 Stormwater Drainage Longitudinal Section & Details
NOOSA 1014-R08 Service Plan - Water and Sewer
BOTANIC 1014-R09 Typical Sections & Miscellaneous Details
GARDENS
ive
SUBJECT SITE
Dr
Part Lot 2 on ld
SP108094 ona
d
ac PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
M
Part of Lot 2 on SP108094
Parish of Maroochy
ke
County of March
La
d
Hoy Roa
Lane
o rse
c eh
Ra
COOROY
Cooroy Noosa Road
CLIENT: JOB NUMBER
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHKD SCALE APPROVED 1014
PROJECT:
DATUM AHD
DESIGN LN
0 200 400 600 800 1000m
................. SHEET: 1 OF 9
DRAWING NUMBER REV
Director: TONY SHELLEY DRAWING TITLE:
DRAWN LN SCALE 1:20,000 A3 (RPEQ 7736)
DESIGN CHECK TS
DRAWING STATUS
07 54534494 R01
This drawing is not to be copied or amended without written permission from [email protected] www.barlowshelley.com.au
DATE 13-11-13 Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers FOR APPROVAL PO Box 432 Buderim 4556 ABN 42 135 788 813
Page 10
LEGEND
EXISTING BUILDING
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA
- SUBJECT SITE
EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY & CARPARKING
EXISTING LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE AND SITE ENTRY
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING BUILDING TO
BE DEMOLISHED
96.00
95.50
95
.50
.50
PP
95
96.00
95.50
95.50
EXISTING WATER
CONNECTION
EXISTING FH
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTINGSTORMWATER EXISTING CONCRETE
95.
00 EXISTING WATER PIT
MAIN
95
.0
0
LA
50
EXISTING SEWAGE
95.
K
TREATMENT SYSTEM
E
TO BE RE-LOCATED
M
AC
95.50
D
O
N
AL
EXISTING 95.50
D
94.50
94.00
BOLLARDS EXISTING GARDEN
D
R
RCP EXISTING EDGE OF CONCRETE
IV
E
94.00 95.00
.50
95
RCP 95
.5 95.00
0
EXISTING ENTRY 94
.5 RCP RCP RCP
0 EXISTING SHEDS
RCP .0
93 EXISTING STAFF PARKING
(27 SPACES GRASS)
0
93.00 95.00
94.0 95.00
00 .5
0
0 94.00 95.00
4. 94
0
93.0
9
93.00
EX
93.00
EX
IST
92.00
CREEK .00
IST
ING
93.00
94
ING
EXISTING
BO
94.00 93.00
TE
EXISTING
UN
LS
DA
BRIDGE
TR
RY
A
00
94.00
92.
.00 94.
93 00
92.0
0
.00
EXISTING EXISTING
93
.00
BRIDGE
91
0
92.0
91.00 91
92.50 91..00
50
CAUTION -
NOTE: EXISTING SERVICES THE CONTRACTOR IS TO DETERMINE THE EXACT
ALL LEVEL AND SURVEY INFORMATION LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING SERVICES IN THE VICINITY OF THE
SUPPLIED BY SKYLINE SURVEYORS PROPOSED WORKS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION.
PH: 07 54934877 THE COST OF ANY RECTIFICATION WORKS DUE TO DAMAGE TO
LEVEL DATUM: AHD, PSM No. EXISTING SERVICES SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR.
CLIENT: JOB NUMBER
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHKD SCALE APPROVED 1014
PROJECT:
DATUM AHD
DESIGN LN
0 7.5 15 22.5 30 37.5m
................. SHEET: 2 OF 9
DRAWING NUMBER REV
Director: TONY SHELLEY DRAWING TITLE:
DRAWN LN SCALE 1:750 A3 (RPEQ 7736)
DESIGN CHECK TS
DRAWING STATUS
07 54534494 R02
This drawing is not to be copied or amended without written permission from [email protected] www.barlowshelley.com.au
DATE 13-11-13 Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers FOR APPROVAL PO Box 432 Buderim 4556 ABN 42 135 788 813
Page 11
LEGEND
EXISTING BUILDING
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA
- SUBJECT SITE
PROPOSED CONCRETE CARPARKING
EXISTING LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE AND SITE ENTRY
EXISTING STAFF CARPARKING (GRASS)
GARDEN AREAS
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING TELSTRA
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM LOCATION
PROPOSED SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM LOCATION
6.0m LANDSCAPING EXISTING STORMWATER
BUFFER EXISTING BUILDING TO BE
96.00
DEMOLISHED PROPOSED STORMWATER
95.50
95
.50
.5 0 > > > GRASS SWALE
PP
95
96.00
95.50
EXISTING CONCRETE;
40 CARPARKING SPACES TO BE
MARKED AS SHOWN; REFER TO DWG
PROPOSED
m R06 FOR DETAILS
6.0
95.50
VISITOR 20 SPACES CAR PROPOSED
PARKING OFFICES; REFER TO
ARCHITECT DWG
EXISTING BUILDING
95.
00
95
.0
0
LA
PROPOSED RCP's
50
95.
K
E
M
AC
95.50
D
TO BE EXTENDED
O
EXISTING CONCRETE
N
AL
95.50
D
94.50 EXISTING GARDEN
94.00
EXISTING
D
R
CONCRETE EXISTING EDGE OF CONCRETE
IV
> > > > > > > >
PROPOSED BUS BAY
>
E
94.00 95.00 >
.50
>
> > 95 95
PROPOSED ENTRY IN PROPOSED GRASS SWALE .5 95.00
0
ACCORDANCE WITH 94
.5
0 PROPOSED RCP PROPOSED RCP
AS 2890.2 & SCRC DWG 93
R0051 0
.0 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
RCP
93.00 95.00 95.00 WATER TANK; EXISTING STAFF PARKING
0 94.0 94.00 95.00
EXISTING ENTRY 00 .5
4. 94
0 (27 SPACES; GRASS)
0
93.0
9
93.00
EX
93.00
EX
CREEK 92.00
IST
.00
IST
EX
93.00
94
ING
IST
IN
EXISTING
G
ING
BO RA
94.00 93.00
TE
EXISTING
UN
L
WA
ST
BRIDGE
DA
TE
RY
00
RM
94.00
92.
AIN
.00 94.
93
6.0m LANDSCAPING 00
m
92.0
6.0
0
BUFFER
.00
EXISTING EXISTING
93
.00
BRIDGE
91
0
92.0
91.00 91
92.50 91..00
50
CAUTION -
EXISTING SERVICES THE CONTRACTOR IS TO DETERMINE THE EXACT
NOTE:
LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING SERVICES IN THE VICINITY OF THE
FOR SET OUT CO-ORDINATES AND PROPOSED WORKS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION.
BUILDING FLOOR LEVELS REFER TO THE COST OF ANY RECTIFICATION WORKS DUE TO DAMAGE TO
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS EXISTING SERVICES SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR.
CLIENT: JOB NUMBER
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHKD SCALE APPROVED 1014
PROJECT:
DATUM AHD
DESIGN LN
0 7.5 15 22.5 30 37.5m
................. SHEET: 3 OF 9
DRAWING NUMBER REV
Director: TONY SHELLEY DRAWING TITLE:
DRAWN LN SCALE 1:750 A3 (RPEQ 7736)
DESIGN CHECK TS
DRAWING STATUS
07 54534494 R03
This drawing is not to be copied or amended without written permission from [email protected] www.barlowshelley.com.au
DATE 13-11-13 Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers FOR APPROVAL PO Box 432 Buderim 4556 ABN 42 135 788 813
Page 12
EXISTING BUILDING
96.00
95.50
95
. 50
.50
PP
95
96.00
95.50
X
X
95.50
X
X
ED
X
GE
LA
OF
K
X
B
E
EXISTING BUILDING
ITU
M
ME
X
95.
AC
00 PROVIDE STORMWATER PIT
N
PROTECTION REFER DETAIL
D
X
O
N
95
X
.0
AL
0
ED
50
D
GE
X
95.
D
OF
R
X
B
IV
ITU
E
ME
X
95.50
N
X
EXISTING CONCRETE
X
95.50
94.50
94.00
EXISTING CONCRETE GRASS SWALE
X > > > > > > >
X
X >
X X X X X
>
MAINTAIN EXISTING X 94.00 95.00 X > >
.50
X
> > X X X X X X X X95 X X X X 95
DRIVEWAY X X X
X X X X .5
0 95.00
X
DURING DEMOLITION AND 94
.50 X
X
GROUND WORK X
LEGEND 00
93
.
PROVIDE SEDIMENT FENCES 93.00 95.00
ALONG BOUNDARY AS SHOWN 94.0 95.00
95.00 .50
0 50 0 94.00 93
X X SEDIMENT FENCE .0 4.
94 9 0
93.00 93.0
ALLOTMENT PIT PROTECTION 92.00
93.0
0
93.00 .00
94
NATURAL SURFACE CONTOURS EXISTING 94.00 93.00
EXISTING
FLOW DIRECTION BRIDGE
00
94.00
92.
TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK DAM .00
93 00
94.
92.0
0
.00
EXISTING EXISTING
93
.00
SEDIMENT & EROSION BRIDGE
91
0
92.0
CONTROL NOTES
1. GENERAL 91.00 91.00
(A) TEMPORARY DRAINAGE CONTROL. FLOW SHOULD BE DIVERTED AROUND
THE WORK SITE WHERE POSSIBLE. UNBOUND PAVEMENT MATERIAL (GRAVEL)
(B) ALL DRAINAGE, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS TO BE INSTALLED AND
SEDIMENT & EROSION BE OPERATIONAL BEFORE COMMENCING UP-SLOPE EARTHWORKS.
TO GRADING 'B', TABLE 9 OF QUEENSLAND
TRANSPORT SPECIFICATION MRSS11.04 - GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO BE TEMPORARY TURF STRIP
(C) ALL SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE REGULARLY
CONTROL PROGRAM INSPECECTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR. INSPECTIONS
EXCLUDE MATERIAL FINER THAN AS
SIEVE 2.36mm WRAPPED OVER GRATE AND SURROUND (400mm MIN' WIDTH)
SHOULD OCCUR ON A WEEKLY BASIS (MINIMUM), ALONG WITH BEFORE SECURED UNDER AS SHOWN - IN LANDSCAPE AREAS
OBJECTIVE/TARGET THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH ALL STATUTORY AND AFTER SIGNIFICANT RUNOFF PRODUCING STORMS.
REGULATIONS AND MAINTAIN THEM DURING EARTHWORKS/ (D) ALL DISTURBED LAND MUST BE RENDERED EROSION-PROOF BY THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF 70% EFFECTIVE GROUND COVER WITHIN 28 DAYS FSL
CONSTRUCTION. ALL PROVISIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS
OUTLINED WITH THE APPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL OF FINAL EARTHWORKS TRIM.
MANAGEMENT PLAN MUST BE ADHERED TO, ALONG WITH (E) IN AREAS WHERE RUNOFF TURBIDITY IS TO BE CONTROLLED, EXPOSED
SURFACES TO BE EITHER MULCHED, COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL FLOW FLOW
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES BLANKETS OR TURFED IF EARTHWORKS ARE EXPECTED TO BE DELAYED
PRESCRIBED WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS BY THE FOR MORE THAN 14 DAYS. STORMWATER
SITE ENGINEER (F) STRAW BALE SEDIMENT TRAPS ARE A SECONDARY OPTION WHICH PIT
GENERALLY SHOULD NOT BE USED IF OTHER OPTIONS ARE AVAILABLE.
'U' SHAPED CHECK DAM
MANAGEMENT THE SITE FOREMAN IS TO IDENTIFY AND CHECK THE 2. SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE
STRATEGY DIRECTION OF STORMWATER FLOWS AS SHOWN ON PLAN. (A) NOT TO BE LOCATED IN AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW. PLAN
PROVIDE BARRIERS AND OTHER MEASURES SHOWN ON (B) NORMALLY LOCATED ALONG THE CONTOUR WITH A MAXIMUM
PLAN TO PREVENT STORMWATER FLOWS OVER
EMBANKMENTS, AND SEDIMENT INTO GULLY PITS
CATCHMENT AREA 0.6 HA PER 100M LENGTH OF FENCE. X 'A' TO BE HIGHER THAN 'B' TO STORMWATER PIT PROTECTION
(C) WOVEN FABRICS ARE PREFERRED, NON-WOVEN FABRICS MAY BE USED LEVEL REMOVE ACCUMULATED PREVENT SEDIMENT BYPASS
ON SMALL WORK SITES, I.E. OPERATIONAL PERIOD LESS THAN 6 SEDIMENT BEFORE DEPTH IS H/2. SCALE 1:20
1:2
1:2
TASKS / ACTIONS ERECT SEDIMENTATION BARRIERS AS DETAILED. MONTHS OR ON SITES WHERE SIGNIFICANT SEDIMENT RUNOFF IS NOT 200 NOM
STRATEGICALLY PLACE CHECK DAMS EXPECTED. LEVEL A A
AROUND GULLY PITS (D) WHERE FENCES NEED TO BE LOCATED ACROSS THE CONTOUR - 500 NOM
REFER IPEAWQ STANDARD DRAWING D-0040 FOR DETAILS. X 1:2 1000 MAX B
1:2
(E) FENCES ARE REQUIRED 2m MIN FROM TOE OF CUT OR FILL BATTERS, H
PERFORMANCE THE SITE FOREMAN IS TO CHECK FOR EROSION AND ROCK APRON IF ORDERED
INDICATORS SEDIMENT FLOWS AT THE BASE OF EMBANKMENTS AFTER WHERE NOT PRACTICAL ONE FENCE CAN BE AT THE TOE WITH A SECOND
FENCE 1M MIN AWAY. FENCE SHOULD NOT BE LOCATED PARALLEL WITH BY THE SUPERINTENDENT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SIGNIFICANT RAINFALL AND SHOULD ASCERTAIN THE TOE IF CONCENTRATION OF FLOW WILL OCCUR BEHIND THE FENCE. 3.0m MAX 3.0m MAX F42 GEOFABRIC
WORKING EFFECTIVENESS OF CHECK DAMS DURING ELEVATION BIDUM U34 OR
GEOTEXTILE SECTION X-X
THIS WET WEATHER 3. TEMP CONSTRUCTION ENTRY/EXIT SEDIMENT TRAP. SIMILAR SPILL THRU WEIR FABRIC (TO AS 1304)
(A) ADJACENT STORMWATER RUNOFF TO BE DIVERTED AWAY FROM ENTRY/EXIT.
(B) WHEEL - WASH OR SPRAY UNIT MAY BE REQUIRED DURING WET WEATHER. (IF REQUIRED)
FREQUENCY / SITE FOREMAN TO MONITOR PERFORMANCE AFTER
DEADLINE EVERY HEAVY DOWNFALL 4. SAFETY ISSUES MUST BE CONSIDERED AT ALL TIMES, INCORPORATE
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES . CHECK DAMS - FLOW CONTROL 300 200
5. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT ALL SEDIMENT
600
RESPONSIBILITY THE SITE FOREMAN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL INSPECTIONS N.T.S. GROUND LEVEL
AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AS STIPULATED
IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN. ADDITIONAL OR DIFFERENT SEDIMENT NOTE:
REPORTING REVIEW SITE WORKMEN ARE TO ADVISE THE FOREMAN IF ANY
& EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE
600
SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE FAILING CHECK DAM CATCHMENT AREA LIMITED TO 4.00 Ha. DEVICE IS INTENDED
TO COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE. FOR VELOCITY CONTROL ONLY - SEDIMENT COLLECTION IS A
6. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES TO HAVE 1:6 SIDE BATTERS (MAXIMUM) AND BE SECONDARY PURPOSE. POSTS OR STEEL PICKETS
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS THE SITE FOREMAN IS TO REPORT AND ORDER THROUGH
SHAPED TO ENSURE RUN-OFF IS TREATED AND MANAGED TO THE DRIVEN 600mm INTO
SUPERVISOR, EXTRA BARRIER OR CHECK DAMS AS
SATISFACTION OF THE SUPERINTENDANT. ALL EXPOSED STOCKPILE SEDIMENT FENCE
REQUIRED
SURFACES TO BE GRASS SEEDED. SEDIMENT FENCES AND CUT-OFF GROUND
SCALE 1:100
DRAINS MAY BE REQUIRED.
CLIENT: JOB NUMBER
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHKD SCALE APPROVED 1014
PROJECT:
DATUM AHD
DESIGN LN
0 7.5 15 22.5 30 37.5m
................. SHEET: 4 OF 9
DRAWING NUMBER REV
Director: TONY SHELLEY DRAWING TITLE:
DRAWN LN SCALE 1:750 A3 (RPEQ 7736)
DESIGN CHECK TS
DRAWING STATUS
07 54534494 R04
This drawing is not to be copied or amended without written permission from [email protected] www.barlowshelley.com.au
DATE 13-11-13 Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers FOR APPROVAL PO Box 432 Buderim 4556 ABN 42 135 788 813
Page 13
LEGEND
EXISTING BUILDING
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA
- SUBJECT SITE
EXISTING BUILDING
PROPOSED CONCRETE CARPARKING
EXISTING LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE AND SITE ENTRY
PROPOSED WIDENING
GARDEN AREAS
EXISTING TELSTRA
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM LOCATION
TE
PROPOSED
RE
OFFICES; REFER TO
NC
95.8
CO
ARCHITECT DWG PROPOSED SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM LOCATION
OF
GE
ED
95.780 EXISTING STORMWATER
FFL 95.85
R0
G
95.632
9
TIN
PROPOSED STORMWATER
IS
PROPOSED 20 SPACES
EX
PROPOSED LEVELS
VISITORS CARPARKING 95.418 EXISTING LEVELS
2.6m x 5.4m
95.7 600 x 600 SW
95.50
EXISTING SURFACE CONTOURS
PIT WITH RAISED GRATE & 95.388
ECOSOL 100GPT OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT; 95.50 PROPOSED SURFACE CONTOURS
REFER TO R09 FOR DETAILS
m
95.646 NOTE:
6.0
EXISTING BUILDING TO .64 95 95.626 95.444
BE DEMOLISHED 95.774 6.2 95.661 FFL 95.80 - EXISTING STORMWATER PITS AND PIPE
6.0m LANDSCAPING 95.69 m 95.6 LOCATIONS AND LEVELS TO BE CONFIRMED
BUFFER; REFER TO .7 83 95.596 EXISTING STORMWATER PIT;
95 95.5 5 95.591
ON SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
LANDSCAPING DRAWINGS 95.6 95.599 RAISE GRATE TO SUIT NEW - EXISTING CONCRETE TO BE REPAIRED AS
FOR DETAILS 95.3 95.503 CONCRETE LEVELS REQUIRED
DRAIN PIPES OUTLET
95. 95.615
TO STORMWATER PIT
95.75 95.6 658 95.467 NOTE:
81
95.641 49
95.6.676 95.496
1. ALL LINEMARKING AND SIGNAGE SHALL
95 95.56 95.571
.6 95.565 BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH DMR "MANUAL
95 95.68 95.5
6.0m
95.422 OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
95.528 DEVICES"
SCRC BARRIER KERB B4 .5 95.383
95 5 2. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL USE
TYPE; .45
95 .498 "TYPE 1" ROAD MARKING PAINT AS
REFER TO R09 FOR 9 5
DEFINED IN DMR's STANDARD
DETAILS 2 95.4 12.5m
.58 1 SPECIFICATION No. MRS11.45 INCLUDING
95 .53 95
.4 5 SOLVENT-BORNE ROAD MARKING PAINT
9 5 .39 6
95 5.38 TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF AS4049.1
5
95 .3
.15
8
9
95 .3
95
PP
.03
95
6.0m
SCRC BARRIER KERB B4 TYPE; 450 x 450 SW 95.286 IL
92
REFER TO R09 FOR DETAILS PIT WITH ECOSOL 100GPT 8.5m .8 1 PAVEMENT MARKINGS
EL PROPERTY BOUN OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT 95.2
DARY
LANE LINES
EXTEND 7.2m EXISTING 450RCP
95. .94
95.4.853
95 .808
94
9
AND INSTALL PRECAST 3.0 1.0 3.0
.12
94
18
145
HEADWALL; IL 94.165 95.0 EL
25.0m 29.6m
5%
CONTINUITY LANE
LINE - (CL) 200mm
94.8
94 .73 IL 93.46
.60 94 582 "W" STEEL BEAM GUARDRAIL FIXED
EXISTING EDGE OF BITUMEN .
94.675
3 .62 DBL
1.0m
2 94 94 .52 ON TOP OF HEADWALL;
94.5 94.6 94 INSTALLATION AND SETOUT IN DOUBLE BARRIER LINE -
(EL)
3.5m
94 9
3.5m
.62 94 4.50 ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT (DBL)
80mm
9 .49
18.4m
80mm
SL 6 OF MAIN ROADS STD DWG 1474
80mm
3.5m
3.5m
LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE (CL)
(EL)
3.5m
ROAD CENTER LINE (DBL)
SEPARATION SL
(DBL) 100mm
3.6m
LINE
3.55
3.6m
EL
EXISTING EDGE OF BITUMEN EDGE LINE 150mm
PROPOSED ENTRY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH
AS 2890.2 & SCRC STD
DWG R005; REFER TO PARKING BAY LINES
DWG R09 FOR SINGLE WHITE LINE 100mm
CROSSOVER DETAILS
CLIENT: JOB NUMBER
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHKD SCALE APPROVED 1014
A 28-01-14 DIMENSIONS ADDED LN TS
PROJECT:
DATUM AHD
DESIGN LN
0 4 8 12 16 20m
................. SHEET: 5 OF 9
DRAWING NUMBER REV
Director: TONY SHELLEY DRAWING TITLE:
DRAWN LN SCALE 1:400 A3 (RPEQ 7736)
DESIGN CHECK TS
DRAWING STATUS
07 54534494 R05 A
This drawing is not to be copied or amended without written permission from [email protected] www.barlowshelley.com.au
DATE 13-11-13 Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers FOR APPROVAL PO Box 432 Buderim 4556 ABN 42 135 788 813
Page 14
EXISTING BUILDING
95
95
.67
LEGEND
.77
PROPOSED 40 CARPARKING SPACES
LINEMARKS
EXISTING BUILDING
95
95
95
.67
.6
.5
6
1
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY & CARPARKING
5.5m 5.5m
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA
95
2.6m
EXISTING BUILDING - SUBJECT SITE
.35
2.6m
EXISTING STORMWATER
95
95
PROPOSED STORMWATER
95
.4
.61
.75
4
> > > GRASS SWALE
95
95
95
2.0m WIDE OVER LAND FLOW DIRECTION
.42
.28
.68
SW PIPE GRASS SWALE; EXISTING SW PIPE EXISTING SURFACE CONTOURS
CUT AND CONNECT EXISTING SW PIPE
.63
REFER TO DWG R09 FOR EXISTING SW PIPE IL 95.1
95
DETAILS EXISTING RCP TO IL 95.1 95.41 PROPOSED LEVELS
IL 95.15 CUT AND CONNECT
95
95.28 EXISTING LEVELS
R09
1050 MH
.63
EXISTING RCP TO1050 MH
IL 94.80
IL 94.91
SWALE IL95.43
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
.44 95
.44
.42
.30
.44
.42 5.39
95
.56
SWALE IL95.194 GRASS SWALE EXISTING EDGE OF CONCRETE
.13
4
2.0m
9
3.0m
> > > > > >
1%
.41 > > >
> IL 94.78 IL 94.68
5.5m
>
10.0m >
IL 94.76
10.0m
> IL 94.89 SL 95.54
SW PIPE 15.0m 2.6m
CONSTRUCT 450 SQ PIT
OVER EXISTING RCP
OUTLET TO UNDERGROUND
SL95.1; REFER DWG R07 OUTLET TO UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND EXISTING STAFF PARKING
WATER TANK
SW PIPE IL94.35 WATER TANK WATER TANK; (27 SPACES; GRASS)
OVERFLOW TO GRASS
SWALE;REFER TO DWG R07
CREEK IL 94.44
FOR DETAILS
DISCONNECT AND
EXISTING REMOVE
BRIDGE SW PIPE
LA
K
EX
E
IST
M
EXISTING
IN
AC
G
BRIDGE
TE
D
ED
LS
O
GE
TR
N
DRAINAGE NOTES
OF
A
AL
ED
EXISTING
BIT
GE
D
UM
1. EASEMENTS SHALL BE CREATED OVER ALL COUNCIL OWNED
OF
D
E
INTER-ALLOTMENT
N
R
BIT
IV
DRAINAGE LINES:
UM
E
EN
2. PIPE BEDDING AND BACKFILL ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION
NO.
4.6 - SEWER RETICULATION FOR UPVC PIPES, AND SPECIFICATION NO.
4.5 - STORMWATER DRAINAGE FOR RC AND FRC PIPES.
ROADWORKS NOTES 3. PIPE MATERIALS ARE UPVC SEWER PIPE MINIMUM CLASS SH; UPVC
DRAINAGE PIPE PLASCOR OR EQUIVALENT, OF EQUIVALENT CLASS TO
UPVC SEWER CLASS SH; R.C.P. CLASS "2" RUBBER RING JOINTED;
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH THE LOCATION, LINE & LEVEL OF
OR F.R.C. PIPE CLASS "X" RUBBER RING JOINTED.
ALL PUBLIC & PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT
4. UPVC PIPES ARE EITHER RUBBER RING JOINTED OR SOLVENT WELD
OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHERE UTILITY SERVICES ARE SHOWN ON
JOINTED.
THE PLANS, THEY ARE SHOWN FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE
STANDARD MANUFACTURER'S FITTINGS ARE USED IN BOTH CASES.
CONTRACTOR ONLY. THE PRINCIPAL SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY
5. FRC AND RCP SYSTEMS ARE CONSTRUCTED BY EMBEDDING THE
OMISSION OF SERVICES FROM THE PLANS OR THE ACCURACY OF ANY
LOWER PRECAST SECTION INTO A WET CAST-INSITU CONCRETE BASE.
SERVICES SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
CUT OUTS FOR PIPE PENETRATIONS ARE MADE USING CONCRETE SAWS/
2. SURFACE LEVELS OVER THE SITE HAVE BEEN INTERPOLATED THROUGH
NOTES COMPUTER MODELLING OF FIELD SURVEY DATA. THESE CALCULATED
DRILLS WHILE MINIMISING DAMAGE TO THE ADJACENT PIPE MATERIALS.
NOTE: 6. LIDS TO CAST-IN-SITU MANHOLES ARE LIGHT DUTY, CLOSE FITTING BOLT
1. SIGNAGE & LINEMARKING TO BE PROVIDED IN LEVELS MAY VARY FROM THE ACTUAL GROUND LEVEL.
- EXISTING STORMWATER PITS AND PIPE DOWN CAST IRON OR GALVANISED STEEL, CONCRETE INFILL TYPE (GATIC
ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION LEVELS SHALL BE SET BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH
LOCATIONS AND LEVELS TO BE CONFIRMED LIGHT DUTY, POLYCRETE BROADSTEL OR SIMILAR) OF APPROXIMATELY
2. NEW LINEMARKING TO BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN. REFERENCE TO SURVEYED BENCH MARKS PROVIDED BY THE
THE SAME INTERNAL DIMENSIONS AS THE MANHOLE.
ON SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 3. LINEMARKING SETOUT AS PER ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN. PRINCIPAL'S APPOINTED SURVEYOR.
7. LIDS TO FRC AND RCP MANHOLES ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
- EXISTING CONCRETE TO BE REPAIRED AS 4. SUBGRADE EVALUATION IS TO BE UNDERTAKEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH
MANUFACTURER'S PROPRIETARY CONCRETE OR CONCRETE INFILL TYPE.
THE PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN ARRB SR41 - A STRUCTURAL DESIGN
REQUIRED 8. LIDS MATCH FINISHED SURFACE GROUND SLOPE AND SIT 25-50 MM
GUIDE FOR FLEXIBLE RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVEMENTS.
PAVEMENT MARKINGS 5. ALL KERBING SHALL CONFORM TO SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL'S
PROUD, AND ARE MARKED "STORMWATER" IMPRESSED INTO THE
CONCRETE INFILL.
RELEVANT STANDARD DRAWINGS.
100mm
9. INFILL CONCRETE IS CLASS N25.
PARKING BAY LINES 6. PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CAUTION - 10. UPVC PIPE AND KERB ADAPTORS ARE USED WHERE DISCHARGE IS
THE QUEENSLAND MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES.
INTO THE KERB AND CHANNEL.
EXISTING SERVICES THE CONTRACTOR IS TO DETERMINE THE 7. PROVIDE TELSTRA AND ENERGEX CONDUITS UNDER CONCRETE DRIVE-
11. INTER-ALLOTMENT DRAINAGE LINES ARE LOCATED 0.5 METRES FROM
EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING SERVICES IN THE VICINITY WAYS, WHERE DIRECTED.
SINGLE WHITE LINE REAR OR SIDE BOUNDARIES WITHIN THE PROPERTIES SERVED.
OF THE PROPOSED WORKS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY 8. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL PERMANENT REFLECTIVE NUMBERING TO
(REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DWG'S FOR FINAL BUILDING AND COURTYARD
THE KERB FACE AS REQUIRED BY SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL.
CONSTRUCTION. THE COST OF ANY RECTIFICATION WORKS SETOUT)
DUE TO DAMAGE TO EXISTING SERVICES SHALL BE BORNE BY 12. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH COUNCIL'S
THE CONTRACTOR. STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR STORMWATER DRAINAGE.
CLIENT: JOB NUMBER
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHKD SCALE APPROVED 1014
PROJECT:
DATUM AHD
DESIGN LN
0 7.5 15 22.5 30 37.5m
................. SHEET: 6 OF 9
DRAWING NUMBER REV
Director: TONY SHELLEY DRAWING TITLE:
DRAWN LN SCALE 1:750 A3 (RPEQ 7736)
DESIGN CHECK TS
DRAWING STATUS
07 54534494 R06
This drawing is not to be copied or amended without written permission from [email protected] www.barlowshelley.com.au
DATE 13-11-13 Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers FOR APPROVAL PO Box 432 Buderim 4556 ABN 42 135 788 813
Page 15
STRUCTURE MANHOLE ACCESS RISER & LID CONCRETE
1/1
2/1
1/2
2/2
1/1
PROPOSED 1050 MH PROPOSED 1050 MH
NAME OR CAST IRON
EXISTING STORMWATER PIT
EXISTING STORMWATER PIT
SURFACE LEVEL SL 95.54
600 * 600 STEEL RAISED
450 * 450 STEEL GRATE
STRUCTURE
EXISTING OUTLET
0.880m
DESCRIPTION
FIELD INLET
FIELD INLET
IL 94.89
IL 94.80 IL 94.78
GRATE
IL 94.66
(CONNECTED TO DOWN PIPE AND PROPOSED MH)
TO GRASS SWALE
(CONNECTED TO DOWN PIPE AND PROPOSED MH)
EXISTING LINE
UNDERGROUND RAINWATER TANK;
TANK SIZE & TYPE AND PUMP TYPE TO BE
DETERMINE BY OWNER
NATURAL SURFACE FINISHED SURFACE
- TYPICAL - TYPICAL UNDERGROUND RAINWATER TANK CONNECTION DETAILS
SCALE 1:50
EXISTING MH
10 YR ARI HYDRAULIC
GRADE LEVEL - TYPICAL
10 DIA ROD C.F.W.
PIPE SIZEmm (Class) 300(2) 150(2) 225(2)
10 SIDE PLATES
TO 50*6 BARS
PIPE GRADE % 6.51% 0.60% 0.60%
DIMENSION + 90mm
PIPE SLOPE 1 in X 15.36 166.66 166.68
INTERNAL WALL
FULL PIPE FLOW VEL. (m/s) 150 300 300 150
0.82 1.03
PART FULL FLOW VEL. (m/s) 2.81 50 x 50mm NICHE 75
TO ACCOMMODATE
DATUM RL 85.0 GALVANISED GRATE
HYDRAULIC
94.840
94.689
92.916
95.256
95.154
95.037
94.927
94.840
94.689
135
GRADE LEVEL 50*6 BARS
AT 50 CRS
900
PIPE FLOW 0.052 0.015 0.042
(Cumecs) GRATE
NOTE:
1. MINIMUM INTERNAL PIT DIMENSION
1.120
0.000
0.691
0.680
0.756
1.100
GOVERNED BY DEPTH:
DEPTH TO INVERT a) 450x450mm SQ (< 900mm DEEP)
b) 600x600mm SQ (< 900mm DEEP)
c) 600x900mm SQ (> 900mm DEEP) PLAN
INVERT LEVEL
94.460
92.810
94.700
94.620
94.544
94.480
2. GRATE TO BE SIZED 90mm LARGER THAN GRATE OMITTED FOR CLARITY
OF DRAIN INTERNAL PIT DIMENSION. ALL METAL
COMPONENTS TO BE HOT DIP
DESIGN SURFACE GALVANISED WITH 10mm SIDE RAISED GRATE
95.580
92.810
95.391
95.300
95.580
PLATES AND 50x6mm BARS AT 50 CTRS.
SCALE 1:40
LEVEL NOTE: REFER DRAINAGE LONG SECTIONS
FOR STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS.
PLAN
N= 4116.111
N= 4114.745
N= 4114.745
N= 4100.151
N= 4106.799
E= 3200.043
E= 3225.344
E= 3204.609
E= 3192.966
E= 3200.043
STRUCTURE SETOUT
COORDINATES STANDARD GRATED ALLOTMENT PIT (450 X450)
(Northing/Easting) SCALE 1:40 (A3)
RUNNING
25.338
13.407
24.048
0.000
0.000
25.34 13.41 10.64
CHAINAGE NOTE:
EXISTING STORMWATER PITS AND PIPE
LINE 1 2 LOCATIONS AND LEVELS TO BE
CONFIRMED ON SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
STORMWATER LONGITUDINAL SECTION (LINE 1 & 2)
CLIENT: JOB NUMBER
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHKD SCALE APPROVED 1014
AHD
0 20 40 60 80 100m PROJECT:
DATUM
DESIGN LN
................. SHEET: 7 OF 9
DRAWING NUMBER REV
LN Director: TONY SHELLEY DRAWING TITLE:
DRAWN 0 2 4 6 8 10m
(RPEQ 7736)
DESIGN CHECK TS SCALE 1:2000 (Horiz.) ; SCALE 1:200 (Vert.) A3
DRAWING STATUS
07 54534494 R07
This drawing is not to be copied or amended without written permission from [email protected] www.barlowshelley.com.au
DATE 13-11-13 FOR APPROVAL
Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers PO Box 432 Buderim 4556 ABN 42 135 788 813
The text continues on page 16.
Used in these records
130814 Permissible Change Request Final.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 4.4 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.