2017-02-07 Planning and Environment Committee Agenda

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   7 FEBRUARY 2017




                                                     Page 54 of 125

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                                          7 FEBRUARY 2017

                                                                                                                                       nra

                  REPORT

                    ITEM                                                             NOTES

                  a              |  CC
                   7.3.1.      _|  With reference to 09, the parking structure dominates the streetscape of both Doonella and Pelican
                                    Streets.
                                         a)  It is noted that improvement to the detailing and materiality of the carpark podium have reduced
                                             the carparking podium’s dominance of the street. Introduction of the two significant feature trees
                                             will further reduce this dominance when viewed from Pelican Street.
                   R32              With reference to 012. The town planning report to the original development application claimed the use of
                                    splayed corners, speed bumps, speed signs and line marking as well as clear pedestrian movement areas.
                                         a)  This needs to be shown on the drawings.

                   ‘1.4          ‘| Landscaping Code Requirements        ==               OO                                              :
                    74.1            With reference to 04 there are concerns about visual concealment spots at the Fire Sprinkler Booster.
                                         a)  It is suggested that the use of 24 hour security lighting be conditioned for the area behind the
                                             ‘lattice’ in the Council's response

                   75      ~_|     Waste Management Code Requirements                    ,
                   75.1             Itis assumed that the applicant has satisfactorily provided Council with sufficient response to curb any
                                    concerns with the scheme’s consistency against 03 and 07 of the Waste Management Code.

                    ce              CONCLUSION
                   8.1              Conclusion
                                    Whilst the character and visual amenity of the response scheme is a vast improvement over the original
                                    application scheme, there remain some areas of concern with regard to setback treatment, public
                                    safety/access as well as improvements which can be made to the building character/aesthetics. We
                                    would suggest the following modifications.
                                    Character
                                         -   Simplify roof configurations to avoid box gutters
                                         -   Include pop-up roof apexes to provide articulation of the long roof forms
                                         -   Remove the northern wall and associated box gutter
                                         -   Soften the junction of wall to carpark in the rear podium carpark — use of landscaping
                                         -   Screen and move the bin enclosure
                                    Setbacks
                                         -   Include significant feature trees to the Pelican Street setback to further reduce bulk of the podium
                                    Safety/Access
                                         -   Incorporate the lift into the stage 4 works
                                | t__ Provide prioritized pathways inthe basement and driveways                                           :
                  Page 7 of 8
                  Y\86035C16 Tewantin RSL Extension\2.0 Email - Correspondence\2.1 Architect\2.1.09 Reports\1.09.1 Predesign\PF 16 2nd Peer Review Report -IssueA.doc yo! Robinson Architects Pt Ltd
                  Issue. Created 24 July 2013                                                                                   A

                                                                                                                                 Page 54 of 125